*Others' mistakes. The apostrophe goes after the plural "s" if you are talking about more people.
I don't do it to disparage the other person, I do it to help them write more correctly next time. If someone fell on the street and I helped him up, you're the type of person that would accuse me of feelings of superiority. Why so cynical?
And also, being a patriot means you not only love your homeland but also respect your language. Sloppiness is not a virtue.
In my personal opinion as an English and only english speaker.of my entire 22 years on earth, English is even more complex than even english speakers think often times and mastering it pays dividends.
You probably know this already but for example, the nazi part of the nazi party stood for "national socialist german workers party" and knowing grammer means the difference between figuring out that the nazis were for Nationwide socialism, not "right wing nationalism" like the left thinks.
And usually "workers party" is what communists call their party historically. Hitler when he first got in went around and did his socialism by fixing up factories and things. like most socialist communist governments, the "free" money they steal from their own citizens to pay for those things runs out and the real problems start. They fix those problems with gulags, concentration camps, and furnaces. Of course, that only makes it worse!
Adolf hitler would be so proud of todays democrat party. Yet the dems refuse to believe it no matter how much we explain it to them. All because cnn abc cbs fox the fbi and the cia, corporations, and morons tell them otherwise.
This may be one of the worst historical analysis bits I've ever read. You get the Smooth Brain Award for today, so congratulations. There are entire Economics Courses at the Undergraduate, and Graduate Levels which examine NatSoc German Economics as a system, evaluating the Pros and Cons, and comparing and contrasting with Communism, Socialism, and Capitalism.
Endeavor to ascertain if you can find some of the required texts for the Courses, read them, then write us a report, debooking your own current understandings. It's still called in Economics Circles "The German Miracle", and it was nothing like you just described. It was an unprecedented explosion of growth, because the Reichsmark was directly pegged to the German GDP. Meaning, if the average worker put in an extra 5 hours each week, not only was that worker paid for the extra hours, but the money he was paid in each successive week was worth more, due to increased National Production. The money that worker had in savings, was actually also worth more a month later, not because of Interest, but the increased strength of the Reichsmark.
The economic structure tremendously incentivized the populace to work harder, which created a much higher standard of living across the Country, as opposed to the very disparate economic conditions, and the horror shows of Weimar, and previously Imperial Dynastic Rule. The German Workers Unions became the models for many European Countries, and their Union Workers still have a tremendously high quality of life today.
Also, your German is shit. It's "Nationalist Socialist German Workers Party", commonly stated as National Socialist Workers Party with the lacking common English Translation. They were Nationalists, and Socialists, putting the interests of Germany First, as a State for Ethnic Germans. Sound familiar in part?? That's because Trumpism is also Economic Nationalism, but without the Socialist and Racialist aspects of the NSDAP. Private Industry and Business Ownership were highly encouraged under the NSDAP, which is the opposite of Communism, wherein The State owns the means of production.
That's not an advocacy for their system, but if you're going to formulate a criticism, you have to start with an accurate understanding of what it is you're attempting to critique.
Your English and grammar are also both terrible as well, for it supposedly being your first language. Do some homework man.
Thanks for your compliments, thanks for your critiques. I personally think you're just looking into one half of what was happening at the time same I was looking into the other half at the same time and then both extremely accurately critiquing my comment at the same time as slightly over reacting regarding, parts like "you have to start with an accurate understanding" part considering that's what I've always attempted to do always. As well as criticising my grammer. I never planned on having absolutely perfect grammer or to have a perfect understanding of grammer. I simply wanted to point out that my journey in attempting to get as close to perfection with my grammer over the years has less to me realising that understanding good grammer in the english language pays dividends and something I appreciate greatly.
also I believe both what you just said about the idea of working the 5 extra hours was happening at the same time socialist ideology was popping up in germany considering the size and scale a society tends to achieve even in the 1930s in germany and what we see even today in the United States considering we see people here trying to forward people into the future safely by doing things like securing our immigration law for example, while other people attempt to do the exact same thing but incorrectly by opening the borders entirely, also for example.
My point is that means all that stuff can be happening at the same exact time. Meaning it's entirely possible that both you and me can both agree so much and disagree about so much without both of us being entirely right or wrong yet at the same time if you pieced both of what we were saying at the same time it reveales even more to what's going on.
So I would like to add that I want you to know that I firmly appreciate your comment in it's entirety even though I disagree with many parts but also have come to understand other parts as well that I didn't understand before and I hope the same for you concerning my comments. I would like to mention that I appreciate what you said and I also believe you were a bit harsh with some parts but that is fine by me considering I call people dumb all the time so it would be hypocritical for me not not be able to take the same type of criticism back and being able to have it be more fun than it is triggering to me. Especially considering that I would like to also insult you without you taking it any more seriously than fun conversation. I try not to get triggered like Dan Crenshaw gets triggered when he talks to young pedes like me that read their constitution closer than he does himself.
You got a bit more analytical than I was prepared for so I tried to spend the time to respond to you according to how you responded to me because I could tell you spend a lot of time to make sure I understood exactly what you wanted to think and say. So I did the same in return. I understand your criticisms of my grammer. I just want you to know that I hope my journey of correct grammer is only at it's start. So I understand why you think my understanding of grammer is bad. I also want you to know that I compare my grammer on what appears to be a different scale than you. I consider my grammer to be extremely good considering most people don't even live in america and speak English let alone have anywhere near good grammer as well as a good understanding of grammer. So by my scale I am extremely good at grammer, but by yours I am bad. That is fine by me and I also would like you to know that I am entirely accepting of any tips on how to improve my grammer by you and especially by anyone who is reading this who knows something I do not. As well as any tips on any other subject I have learned incorrectly. Just know I may not agree with you as well and may not chose to believe what you hold as true unless I am able to confirm its truthfulness.
Thanks for your comment pede. I hope you learned from this like I did as well as other pedes. Ive been drinking too much and I usually try not to drink as much as I can so I'm going to bed now. Good night love u all. I spent way too long on this but I wanted to ensure you got the reply you deserve from me after dedicating the time you did to reply to my comment. I wasn't planning on it being a class in economics and I appreciate you're kind words as well as I appreciate some of your information concerning some of the situation concerning germany I both didn't think about but also believed happened at the same time alongside the socialism leading to us both having such different views on the situation in germany concerning the time frame Adolf hitler came around.
I firmly believe no man can have much more than bad grammer as God is the only thing that can have perfect grammer and I've spent years trying to perfect my grammer and I still both mess up or put grammer aside to focus more on content and information. So what happened is as expected. Which is a good thing.
I don't have autism but I might now so that's enough for tonight. Thanks pedes. Love you bro. Thanks for the information
*Others' mistakes. The apostrophe goes after the plural "s" if you are talking about more people.
I don't do it to disparage the other person, I do it to help them write more correctly next time. If someone fell on the street and I helped him up, you're the type of person that would accuse me of feelings of superiority. Why so cynical?
And also, being a patriot means you not only love your homeland but also respect your language. Sloppiness is not a virtue.
In my personal opinion as an English and only english speaker.of my entire 22 years on earth, English is even more complex than even english speakers think often times and mastering it pays dividends.
You probably know this already but for example, the nazi part of the nazi party stood for "national socialist german workers party" and knowing grammer means the difference between figuring out that the nazis were for Nationwide socialism, not "right wing nationalism" like the left thinks.
And usually "workers party" is what communists call their party historically. Hitler when he first got in went around and did his socialism by fixing up factories and things. like most socialist communist governments, the "free" money they steal from their own citizens to pay for those things runs out and the real problems start. They fix those problems with gulags, concentration camps, and furnaces. Of course, that only makes it worse!
Adolf hitler would be so proud of todays democrat party. Yet the dems refuse to believe it no matter how much we explain it to them. All because cnn abc cbs fox the fbi and the cia, corporations, and morons tell them otherwise.
This may be one of the worst historical analysis bits I've ever read. You get the Smooth Brain Award for today, so congratulations. There are entire Economics Courses at the Undergraduate, and Graduate Levels which examine NatSoc German Economics as a system, evaluating the Pros and Cons, and comparing and contrasting with Communism, Socialism, and Capitalism.
Endeavor to ascertain if you can find some of the required texts for the Courses, read them, then write us a report, debooking your own current understandings. It's still called in Economics Circles "The German Miracle", and it was nothing like you just described. It was an unprecedented explosion of growth, because the Reichsmark was directly pegged to the German GDP. Meaning, if the average worker put in an extra 5 hours each week, not only was that worker paid for the extra hours, but the money he was paid in each successive week was worth more, due to increased National Production. The money that worker had in savings, was actually also worth more a month later, not because of Interest, but the increased strength of the Reichsmark.
The economic structure tremendously incentivized the populace to work harder, which created a much higher standard of living across the Country, as opposed to the very disparate economic conditions, and the horror shows of Weimar, and previously Imperial Dynastic Rule. The German Workers Unions became the models for many European Countries, and their Union Workers still have a tremendously high quality of life today.
Also, your German is shit. It's "Nationalist Socialist German Workers Party", commonly stated as National Socialist Workers Party with the lacking common English Translation. They were Nationalists, and Socialists, putting the interests of Germany First, as a State for Ethnic Germans. Sound familiar in part?? That's because Trumpism is also Economic Nationalism, but without the Socialist and Racialist aspects of the NSDAP. Private Industry and Business Ownership were highly encouraged under the NSDAP, which is the opposite of Communism, wherein The State owns the means of production.
That's not an advocacy for their system, but if you're going to formulate a criticism, you have to start with an accurate understanding of what it is you're attempting to critique.
Your English and grammar are also both terrible as well, for it supposedly being your first language. Do some homework man.
Thanks for your compliments, thanks for your critiques. I personally think you're just looking into one half of what was happening at the time same I was looking into the other half at the same time and then both extremely accurately critiquing my comment at the same time as slightly over reacting regarding, parts like "you have to start with an accurate understanding" part considering that's what I've always attempted to do always. As well as criticising my grammer. I never planned on having absolutely perfect grammer or to have a perfect understanding of grammer. I simply wanted to point out that my journey in attempting to get as close to perfection with my grammer over the years has less to me realising that understanding good grammer in the english language pays dividends and something I appreciate greatly.
also I believe both what you just said about the idea of working the 5 extra hours was happening at the same time socialist ideology was popping up in germany considering the size and scale a society tends to achieve even in the 1930s in germany and what we see even today in the United States considering we see people here trying to forward people into the future safely by doing things like securing our immigration law for example, while other people attempt to do the exact same thing but incorrectly by opening the borders entirely, also for example.
My point is that means all that stuff can be happening at the same exact time. Meaning it's entirely possible that both you and me can both agree so much and disagree about so much without both of us being entirely right or wrong yet at the same time if you pieced both of what we were saying at the same time it reveales even more to what's going on.
So I would like to add that I want you to know that I firmly appreciate your comment in it's entirety even though I disagree with many parts but also have come to understand other parts as well that I didn't understand before and I hope the same for you concerning my comments. I would like to mention that I appreciate what you said and I also believe you were a bit harsh with some parts but that is fine by me considering I call people dumb all the time so it would be hypocritical for me not not be able to take the same type of criticism back and being able to have it be more fun than it is triggering to me. Especially considering that I would like to also insult you without you taking it any more seriously than fun conversation. I try not to get triggered like Dan Crenshaw gets triggered when he talks to young pedes like me that read their constitution closer than he does himself.
You got a bit more analytical than I was prepared for so I tried to spend the time to respond to you according to how you responded to me because I could tell you spend a lot of time to make sure I understood exactly what you wanted to think and say. So I did the same in return. I understand your criticisms of my grammer. I just want you to know that I hope my journey of correct grammer is only at it's start. So I understand why you think my understanding of grammer is bad. I also want you to know that I compare my grammer on what appears to be a different scale than you. I consider my grammer to be extremely good considering most people don't even live in america and speak English let alone have anywhere near good grammer as well as a good understanding of grammer. So by my scale I am extremely good at grammer, but by yours I am bad. That is fine by me and I also would like you to know that I am entirely accepting of any tips on how to improve my grammer by you and especially by anyone who is reading this who knows something I do not. As well as any tips on any other subject I have learned incorrectly. Just know I may not agree with you as well and may not chose to believe what you hold as true unless I am able to confirm its truthfulness.
Thanks for your comment pede. I hope you learned from this like I did as well as other pedes. Ive been drinking too much and I usually try not to drink as much as I can so I'm going to bed now. Good night love u all. I spent way too long on this but I wanted to ensure you got the reply you deserve from me after dedicating the time you did to reply to my comment. I wasn't planning on it being a class in economics and I appreciate you're kind words as well as I appreciate some of your information concerning some of the situation concerning germany I both didn't think about but also believed happened at the same time alongside the socialism leading to us both having such different views on the situation in germany concerning the time frame Adolf hitler came around.
I firmly believe no man can have much more than bad grammer as God is the only thing that can have perfect grammer and I've spent years trying to perfect my grammer and I still both mess up or put grammer aside to focus more on content and information. So what happened is as expected. Which is a good thing.
I don't have autism but I might now so that's enough for tonight. Thanks pedes. Love you bro. Thanks for the information