795
Comments (27)
sorted by:
17
oldschoolkiwi 17 points ago +17 / -0

You can have cola in your veins and test positive.

Hmmmm Covid 99.75% survival rate, Vaccine 90% survival rate I choose Covid

12
PapaPepe 12 points ago +12 / -0

They tested a can of coke in the Australia parliament a week ago and it tested positive.

1
oldschoolkiwi 1 point ago +1 / -0

I saw that posted on TDW Austrian on tv coke tested positive

6
micaarzur 6 points ago +6 / -0

I am 100% against the vaccine, but we should stop spreading false information. Makes us look dumb. The vaccine doesn't have a 90% survival rate, it is supposedly "90% effective" at preventing infection (doubt it), which is supposed to be an extra layer of protection to the 99.75% chance of death if you get it. Would bring total chances of death if exposed to 99.975%

1
oldschoolkiwi 1 point ago +1 / -0

good to see that wasn't lost on everyone

4
thekindlyman555 4 points ago +4 / -0

Cola makes the test positive because of its acidity. If you have acidic blood, you have much bigger problems on your hands than COVID.

15
thelastlast 15 points ago +16 / -1

want to know a secret about hospital labs?

lotta the people that work there are the same BLM people who worked the elections. i'm not kidding.

3
hunterhiden 3 points ago +3 / -0

these people have real jobs?

4
thelastlast 4 points ago +4 / -0

those people have shit jobs that they hate, with no loyalty or care going into their work.

you could say that this is the company's fault and hey, maybe you'd be right. but i'm just telling you those people are all up in the labs.

2
hunterhiden 2 points ago +2 / -0

it's true, i forgot about that, they're everywhere

7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
1
bootsy_two_scoops 1 point ago +2 / -1

Deaths are in track to be up about 7%. Most of these happened during the spring lockdown, fell to a minimum during the summer and started coming back up when the mask mandates and 2nd lockdowns came.

Suicide, overdose, unemployment, crime, loss of medical screening and preventative care...

5
Watermelons 5 points ago +5 / -0

The math is bad.
100%- 0.00003%=99.99997% 100% - 0.0002%= 99.9998% 100% - 0.005%=99.995%...

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
micaarzur 2 points ago +2 / -0

They mistakenly put a percentage symbol on the infection rate numbers.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
Postal 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm pretty sure that is the chances of getting infected AND dying from it. Whereas the 99.998% is chances once you have it.

4
Postal 4 points ago +4 / -0

Can you link with the screenshots so we can pull this info.

2
Gesirisi 2 points ago +2 / -0

This has some partly deboonked information according to Facebook FakkCheckaz

2
khrysiis 2 points ago +2 / -0

The math is not adding up for me. .0003% rate for 0-19 would be 99.99997% survival rate. All the numbers are wrong but for age 70+ the fatality rate of .054% would be 99.946% survival rate. Right?

3
maganova 3 points ago +3 / -0

I think the middle column isn’t supposed to be a percentage but rather the decimal form

1
Forgototherpassword [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Looks like they forgot to convert infection fatality to a percent, but added the symbol. Move the decimal 2 to the right on each one.

2
ClarenceBeeks 2 points ago +2 / -0

So if we take out the nursing home deaths then it’s probably less dangerous than the flu

4
Forgototherpassword [S] 4 points ago +4 / -0

https://media.thedonald.win/post/6Xgifp4i.png

Numbers from Italy showed exactly what we know now 1 week before democrat governors put out orders to put COVID+ in nursing homes. Michigan put a 20 year old boxer in a nursing home. He then started assaulting white patients because he is racist. Why would you put a 20 year old in a nursing home? With a disease that's kill old people?

2
ClarenceBeeks 2 points ago +2 / -0

Only makes sense if your goal to create as much chaos and pain as possible

1
ZoominLikeToobin 1 point ago +1 / -0

Interesting how they dont label the survival rate as being the case survival rate rather than the infection survival rate in the center. Based on this there is a 1% rate of infections becoming cases.

1
Talon881 1 point ago +1 / -0

source?