5431
🤡 🌎 (media.patriots.win)
posted ago by Forty_Five ago by Forty_Five +5432 / -1
Comments (348)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
82
unspecified_user 82 points ago +82 / -0

"looked incredible"

well yes, saying Big Mike is a woman is not credible, but as far as looks go, that "dress" looks like some contraption you'd see in the maintenance room of an abandoned 1950s Albanian water treatment facility.

Honestly, who the hell would ever look at her, and that monstrosity she's wearing, and say, while honestly believing it, "oh yeah, that looks great! Absolutely stunning!" ? I mean, what is wrong with them?

44
ihaveotherthingstodo 44 points ago +44 / -0

some contraption you'd see in the maintenance room of an abandoned 1950s Albanian water treatment facility.

Hey everybody, look at this! Dave Barry is a pede.

19
deleted 19 points ago +19 / -0
7
Mona1950 7 points ago +7 / -0

That is such a lovely sentence.

2
unspecified_user 2 points ago +2 / -0

Hahaha, thank you, I appreciate the comparison (at least from what I remember of his writing when I used to read his columns regularly, which has been a while)

2
ihaveotherthingstodo 2 points ago +2 / -0

I read that sentence about 3 times - the first time. It's a gem.

22
Mona1950 22 points ago +22 / -0

The boobs aren't even in the right place. Monstrosity it is.

22
ontothefuture 22 points ago +22 / -0

why do my eyes tell me that thing is ugly as shit.

17
BillGateCanSuckIt 17 points ago +17 / -0

The emperor wears no clothes story.

4
rudi_reifenstecher 4 points ago +4 / -0

if the gown is that tight it doesnt look "incredible"

2
unspecified_user 2 points ago +2 / -0

When a "feminine" outfit's main result is to higglight that the wearer's figure is a bulky cylinder with zero hint of any aspect of "hourglass" I can't see how it could be considered anything other than an abject failure. Especially when she could have probably spent $5,000 less to achieve the same look.