2405
Comments (239)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
18
LowKeyPede 18 points ago +18 / -0

By definition, this is an EXPERIMENTAL vaccine. It is not "safe to assume" anything at this point.

-7
MAGA45_2 -7 points ago +2 / -9

Saying we’ve had a fairly decent sized trials already and the current response is directly in line with what the trials showed. I think it’s pretty safe to assume that things will go in line, at least mostly, with the trials.

6
ILearnedToCode 6 points ago +7 / -1

And In the trials, people died, got bella palsy, fainted, plus a million other side effects. So "going in line," with the trials is not necessarily a good thing

-1
MAGA45_2 -1 points ago +2 / -3

Not any more than happens anyway I’m the general public though. With a large enough trial you will guarantee to have a death and some of these other things. They happen to people everyday. If you get a large enough group you will catch stuff that would happen anyway. You have to compare the number with general public numbers to see if it’s because of the trial or just in line with norm. If it’s in line with norm you ignore it.

5
LowKeyPede 5 points ago +5 / -0

Because a pharma company would never tweak trial data where there is a ton of money on the line and they have zero liability (it has been done before). I'mm sure the trials for Vioxx, DES and thalmadhide all showed they were safe too...just to name a few. This from the unethical industry who brought us the opioid epidemic. Not to mention mRNA technology, a brand new technology. I'm not concerned about short term effects, I'm concerned about what this does in the long run...all for a disease with a 99.7+% survival rate. Look, I'm fine if people want to take this and I wish them the best, but I will protect my right to bodily integrity to my dying breath.