I’m not talking about statistical anomalies. Matt Braynard has found tens of thousands of out of state or otherwise ineligible voters. Such votes are obviously automatically invalid, and would easily flip states back to Trump with nothing more than an audit.
Unfortunately mail-in ballots are separated from their envelopes after opening and the is no way to ever connect the two again. You couldn't throw these ballots out now even if you wanted to (well, unless you throw ALL mail-in ballots out).
Easy, have a team of people go door to door to the ones who wont answer their phone to confirm if in fact the voted that way. Yes it would be a lot of money and a lot of work but it should be verifiable in this situation.
Isn’t the Go-To defense about our findings, this community, that the illegal votes weren’t counted and that we are just looking for excuses to invalidate actual legal votes? That’s the crap I’ve been seeing everywhere, can’t find any basis for how they know no illegal votes were counted but that is beside the point.
"we dont have freedom of the press in our country"
true Mr. President. I kind of wanted to hear, he was about to say how long he thought it was going on.
those of us on T_D know that the press has always been a pack of sellout cunts.
look up the namesake of their main media prize, the Pulitzer.
look up the dueling newspapers of the railroad magnate robber-barons.
hell, look up the god damned Whiskey Rebellion, where Washington himself was forced to betray freedom only a few years into the new Republic.
"A More Perfect Union." we didn't start the fire pedes, but we have a chance to literally make the entire world better for all humans if we DON'T. STOP. FIGHTING.
The Whiskey Rebellion took place between 1791 and 1794 in the state of Pennsylvania. The state was founded in December of 1787 and had at least two governors before the rebellion began. The farmers west of the Appalachian mountain range hated the tax, which applied to all alcoholic drinks, because they used whiskey distilled from their spare grain to earn additional money. The people who went on to rebel claimed they didn’t have local representation, so they couldn’t be taxed. While many of the rebels were former Revolutionary War veterans, this was a blatant twist on why the Revolutionary War happened.
Ultimately, the rebellion was settled peacefully when the whopping 500 rebels disbanded and left before Washington arrived with his ~13,000 man army. Of those 500, about 20 were arrested before being pardoned later. The Whiskey Rebellion wasn’t a rebellion against injustice, it was just a couple of farmers who were pissy they had to pay a tax on a high demand product they were selling. Interestingly enough, Congress had already heavily taxed imports before the idea of taxing alcohol/spirits was even proposed. The tax was later repealed during the Jefferson administration.
There was no betrayal of freedom, just a distortion of history.
Washington himself was reluctant to send those troops.
As far as I know, Washington was not reluctant to send troops in. He actually called upon states to assemble the army for him while sending diplomats to the rebels to peacefully resolve the issue. Since fighting never occurred, it seems his peace making efforts succeeded. None the less, he was still prepared to crush a rebellion if they would not stop. Reluctant to send the troops? Probably not. Reluctant to resort to violence? Definitely.
... the tax was disproportionate...
No, it wasn’t as the tax was either pay the same fee per gallon or pay a bulk fee for the entire load. This wasn’t disproportionate, it was actually the exact same between small time distillers and large distillers. People believe it was disproportionate because small time distillers often opted to not pay the flat fee, which caused the tax to be as low as 6 cents per gallon in some cases, and instead chose to pay the 9 cents per gallon. This is a simple economic issue that the farmers believed not paying the fee was the better option.
... was without representation.
No, they were not as they did have a governor at the time. In fact, the had six governors before the were officially founded and it seems that Mifflin [First Governor after Penney was founded.] was on his second term in the state when the tax was enacted. Unlike the colonies whom, at best, had virtual representation before the Revolutionary war broke out. The difference being that it was assumed certain people would speak for the best interest for British subjects in virtual representation. Our representation is called actual representation as those representing us [back then at least] are who we chose.
not reluctant to send troops but definitely reluctant to resort to violence- you decide if that makes sense.
the flat fee was 'distilled' (puns!) more easily by larger producers of whisky. so it ended up being more expensive for small businesses (sound familiar?). they went with the per-gallon because it was cheaper for them. somehow their cheapest option was more expensive per gallon than the big suppliers near the city. SOMEHOW.
they were competing with interests from the same state, so the governor being a representative is moot, their unfair competitors had the same representative. who do you think he helped? sound familiar? counties far away from cities got less rights. sound familiar?
not reluctant to send troops but definitely reluctant to resort to violence- you decide if that makes sense.
Are you aware that Intimidation is an actual tactic? He had states raise an army for the occasion and marched there with them, so he was not reluctant to send troops there. We know he wanted to end it without violence as he sent diplomats to peacefully resolve the situation, which worked. You’re trying to blur these lines to tarnish Washington for no good reason.
... so it ended up being more expensive for small businesses...
It wasn’t, it was the same price for both; however, small “businesses” didn’t believe that flat fee was worth it which caused them to lose more money. They made poor economic decisions and, as a result, their price to operate climbed. I haven’t found anything that indicates how much they sold their whiskey for nor how many gallons were taken per trip, so we won’t be able to actually prove that the 9 cents per gallon was better for them.
they were competing interests from the same state, so the governor being a representative is moot. Their unfair competitors had the same representative.
The state of Pennsylvania had a population of ~17,000 across its entirety when the tax was enabled. For reference, the state of New York had a population of ~25,000 during the revolutionary war, more than a decade prior. It wasn’t exactly a high population/high density state when this occurred. Beyond that, it has been noted that [during that time period] the small distilleries competition were “eastern” grain farms, so probably not the same state as it was specifically those west of the Appalachian Mountain range that were upset by the tax. Finally, this tax applied to the entirety of the country and not just Pennsylvania, whom is only of note because of the rebellion.
I mention all of this because, I sincerely doubt there was a large enough urban center in Pennsylvania less than a decade after its founding to generate the same level of corruption we see today. In addition to that, their competition didn’t have the same representative as their competition was across the whole country. Whiskey was not the only “spirit” effected by the tax, it was just the spirit of choice for small farmers. Which means the stubbornly stuck with whiskey because they didn’t want to branch off into other [alcohol] markets. It was an economic decision to stick with whiskey and to stick with the higher tax per gallon. This is nothing more than people complaining that their competition was better than them, disregarding that such capabilities were only possible because the competition started before them and invested more than them. The taxation was lawful and governments ought to be able to collect tax.
im not trying to tarnish Washington. I'm glad he was reluctant. but he did strongarm farmers. our forefathers were human. there probably wasn't a cherry tree.
why would they not believe the flat fee was worth it? what possible reason? because it cost them more. i'm trying not to curse you.
there's so much retardation in the last thing, I kind of think i've fallen for trolling. West of Appalach is still PA. and farmers didnt have the option of branching out.
seriously are you fucking with me? I'm wasting time anyway, I don't really care if it's spent arguing history with someone. on the contrary.
... he did strongarm farmers. our forefathers were human.
Fair enough.
there probably wasn’t a cherry tree.
I thought that was myth anyways? Like that one about Abraham Lincoln being unable to tell a lie.
why would they not believe the flat fee was worth it?
Arguably slower growth to their profits or even a decrease to profit margins, assuming they were reinvesting the profits into brewing anyways. Given that the tax remained the same across the country regardless of who it effected, I’m still not convinced it was disproportionate nor meant to help big farma stomp out local farms. Maybe I am wrong though.
there’s so much retardation in the last thing, I think I’ve fallen for a trolling.
If I have such a poor understanding of the events, then I’m going to pull a redditor and ask you to ELI5.
West of Appalach is still PA.
I never argued it wasn’t?
farmers didn’t have the option of branching out,
By branching out, do we mean like expanding our land for greater production or something more akin to franchising? Perhaps something different?
seriously are you fucking with me? I’m wasting time anyway, I don’t really care if it’s spent arguing history with someone. on the contrary.
No and so long as we don’t take ourselves too seriously, this should remain a good experience.
I’m not trying to tarnish Washington.
Okay then, I’m sorry if I’ve been an ass. There have been a lot of undercover Leftists on this site recently. Given their propensity for smearing and demonizing our history, it’s really hard to tell.
So close we can smell it. You have 80 million supporters behind you in spite of the constant propaganda we're being shoved down our throats, never forget that!
Fired the Defense Secretary
Fired the head of CISA
Removed all Globalists from the Pentagon Advisory Board
Replaced the Attorney General to an acting one that specializes in Foreign election interference
Appointed another attorney from the military who served in the same unit as General Flynn as Deputy Attorney General (His father also happened to work for JFK)
Signed an executive order outlining military succession
Moved 3 aircraft carriers to the west coast with a strike group
Moved 2 aircraft carriers to the east coast with a strike group
Changed federal execution laws to allow bullets and hanging
Signed an EO making the 24th a federal holiday for 2020 only.
Cut off all funding for CIA dark ops
Made it so Special Ops in the military reports directly to the Defense Secretary
I disagree. Trump has awoken millions to the corruption and the Truth of the matter that we are at war with the Radical Left and the Deep State Cabal.
He may leave office if we the people don’t show up and support him. His movement has grown far bigger than himself. In office or not, Patriots now know what we are up against and we know that war is likely the only way out.
I’ll say this as far as “suppressed news”. The thing about the negative publicity they gave Trump in 2016-2020 is that it was still publicity. They realized “we can’t even talk about him. Because the more we talk about him even if it’s bad. The more popular he becomes. So let’s just not talk about him at all.” I don’t think the Trump team realizes the incredible gift they have given him, he could really do anything and they won’t report on it. Let me repeat...ANY. THING.
Oh PLEASE! You arent going to go burn anything down. Its great fun to talk smack on an internet board but its all you are going to do. If you were anything more than talk talk talk we would have heard about your arrest by now. Stop playing tough guy and go do something meaningful.
Calling out asshats who say things like elections are meaningless and our only recourse is to burn everything down. Which makes everyone on the site look bad. Which gives creedence to our critics when they call us violent exremists. Just to make themselves sound tough.
So dont go all moral high ground. You came out with the BS post about burning things down, trying to sound like a tough guy when you're clearly not. Since then you've tried to weasel out and turn it around like I'm the bad person for calling out your call for violence.
Now its time for you to go away and stop embarrasing yourself.
I may be wrong but I think this may be the last shot at getting justice via the SCOTUS. It’s filed by Sidney Powell. She wants to present the evidence of fraud in four states (Michigan, Georgia, Arizona and Wisconsin). She wants to consolidate all cases into one.
Arizona and Wisconsin filings were rejected for unknown reasons while in the other two the defendants (Michigan & Georgia) were given a date to respond as January 14, 2021. Ms. Powell has filed a petition to expedite the cases.
I know Jerome Corsi on the Cats Roundtable this morning was pretty confident Trump will pull it out. He seemed to think it was very significant they stopped updating the Biden gender transition team. Felt maybe they were already arresting people and keeping it under wraps.
We’ve already found more than enough for that with Braynard alone. Why would they be looking for another thousand?
Statistical anomalies aren't enough because the defense is "well, it happened".
I’m not talking about statistical anomalies. Matt Braynard has found tens of thousands of out of state or otherwise ineligible voters. Such votes are obviously automatically invalid, and would easily flip states back to Trump with nothing more than an audit.
Unfortunately mail-in ballots are separated from their envelopes after opening and the is no way to ever connect the two again. You couldn't throw these ballots out now even if you wanted to (well, unless you throw ALL mail-in ballots out).
Easy, have a team of people go door to door to the ones who wont answer their phone to confirm if in fact the voted that way. Yes it would be a lot of money and a lot of work but it should be verifiable in this situation.
I'm from the future. Spoiler alert:
I think they are literally doing that in WI. Need 20k+ and its a win.
Isn’t the Go-To defense about our findings, this community, that the illegal votes weren’t counted and that we are just looking for excuses to invalidate actual legal votes? That’s the crap I’ve been seeing everywhere, can’t find any basis for how they know no illegal votes were counted but that is beside the point.
In which states? One in particular or all the swing states?
Here’s Braynard’s tweet regarding the COA voters. Keep in mind, this is just ONE type of illegitimate vote.
https://twitter.com/MattBraynard/status/1329700179537178625?s=20
It's not what you think know. It's not what you actually know. It's what you can prove in court.
Overturn? Trump won. How is that overturning it
Did Rudy say that for Wisconsin? If not what state?
Link to audio: https://twitter.com/anonpatriotq/status/1340689959594979328?s=20
thannks
"we dont have freedom of the press in our country"
true Mr. President. I kind of wanted to hear, he was about to say how long he thought it was going on.
those of us on T_D know that the press has always been a pack of sellout cunts.
look up the namesake of their main media prize, the Pulitzer.
look up the dueling newspapers of the railroad magnate robber-barons.
hell, look up the god damned Whiskey Rebellion, where Washington himself was forced to betray freedom only a few years into the new Republic.
"A More Perfect Union." we didn't start the fire pedes, but we have a chance to literally make the entire world better for all humans if we DON'T. STOP. FIGHTING.
The Whiskey Rebellion took place between 1791 and 1794 in the state of Pennsylvania. The state was founded in December of 1787 and had at least two governors before the rebellion began. The farmers west of the Appalachian mountain range hated the tax, which applied to all alcoholic drinks, because they used whiskey distilled from their spare grain to earn additional money. The people who went on to rebel claimed they didn’t have local representation, so they couldn’t be taxed. While many of the rebels were former Revolutionary War veterans, this was a blatant twist on why the Revolutionary War happened.
Ultimately, the rebellion was settled peacefully when the whopping 500 rebels disbanded and left before Washington arrived with his ~13,000 man army. Of those 500, about 20 were arrested before being pardoned later. The Whiskey Rebellion wasn’t a rebellion against injustice, it was just a couple of farmers who were pissy they had to pay a tax on a high demand product they were selling. Interestingly enough, Congress had already heavily taxed imports before the idea of taxing alcohol/spirits was even proposed. The tax was later repealed during the Jefferson administration.
There was no betrayal of freedom, just a distortion of history.
thanks, I knew the history. the fact that you can relay it accurately and still come down on the side of the govt makes you NONFREN.
Washington himself was reluctant to send those troops. and the tax was disproportionate and was without representation.
FURTHER STUDY REQUIRED, PLEASE SEE ME AFTER CLASS
As far as I know, Washington was not reluctant to send troops in. He actually called upon states to assemble the army for him while sending diplomats to the rebels to peacefully resolve the issue. Since fighting never occurred, it seems his peace making efforts succeeded. None the less, he was still prepared to crush a rebellion if they would not stop. Reluctant to send the troops? Probably not. Reluctant to resort to violence? Definitely.
No, it wasn’t as the tax was either pay the same fee per gallon or pay a bulk fee for the entire load. This wasn’t disproportionate, it was actually the exact same between small time distillers and large distillers. People believe it was disproportionate because small time distillers often opted to not pay the flat fee, which caused the tax to be as low as 6 cents per gallon in some cases, and instead chose to pay the 9 cents per gallon. This is a simple economic issue that the farmers believed not paying the fee was the better option.
No, they were not as they did have a governor at the time. In fact, the had six governors before the were officially founded and it seems that Mifflin [First Governor after Penney was founded.] was on his second term in the state when the tax was enacted. Unlike the colonies whom, at best, had virtual representation before the Revolutionary war broke out. The difference being that it was assumed certain people would speak for the best interest for British subjects in virtual representation. Our representation is called actual representation as those representing us [back then at least] are who we chose.
holy fuck.
not reluctant to send troops but definitely reluctant to resort to violence- you decide if that makes sense.
the flat fee was 'distilled' (puns!) more easily by larger producers of whisky. so it ended up being more expensive for small businesses (sound familiar?). they went with the per-gallon because it was cheaper for them. somehow their cheapest option was more expensive per gallon than the big suppliers near the city. SOMEHOW.
they were competing with interests from the same state, so the governor being a representative is moot, their unfair competitors had the same representative. who do you think he helped? sound familiar? counties far away from cities got less rights. sound familiar?
what are you a Tory?
Are you aware that Intimidation is an actual tactic? He had states raise an army for the occasion and marched there with them, so he was not reluctant to send troops there. We know he wanted to end it without violence as he sent diplomats to peacefully resolve the situation, which worked. You’re trying to blur these lines to tarnish Washington for no good reason.
It wasn’t, it was the same price for both; however, small “businesses” didn’t believe that flat fee was worth it which caused them to lose more money. They made poor economic decisions and, as a result, their price to operate climbed. I haven’t found anything that indicates how much they sold their whiskey for nor how many gallons were taken per trip, so we won’t be able to actually prove that the 9 cents per gallon was better for them.
The state of Pennsylvania had a population of ~17,000 across its entirety when the tax was enabled. For reference, the state of New York had a population of ~25,000 during the revolutionary war, more than a decade prior. It wasn’t exactly a high population/high density state when this occurred. Beyond that, it has been noted that [during that time period] the small distilleries competition were “eastern” grain farms, so probably not the same state as it was specifically those west of the Appalachian Mountain range that were upset by the tax. Finally, this tax applied to the entirety of the country and not just Pennsylvania, whom is only of note because of the rebellion.
I mention all of this because, I sincerely doubt there was a large enough urban center in Pennsylvania less than a decade after its founding to generate the same level of corruption we see today. In addition to that, their competition didn’t have the same representative as their competition was across the whole country. Whiskey was not the only “spirit” effected by the tax, it was just the spirit of choice for small farmers. Which means the stubbornly stuck with whiskey because they didn’t want to branch off into other [alcohol] markets. It was an economic decision to stick with whiskey and to stick with the higher tax per gallon. This is nothing more than people complaining that their competition was better than them, disregarding that such capabilities were only possible because the competition started before them and invested more than them. The taxation was lawful and governments ought to be able to collect tax.
I don’t know what a Tory is.
im not trying to tarnish Washington. I'm glad he was reluctant. but he did strongarm farmers. our forefathers were human. there probably wasn't a cherry tree.
why would they not believe the flat fee was worth it? what possible reason? because it cost them more. i'm trying not to curse you.
there's so much retardation in the last thing, I kind of think i've fallen for trolling. West of Appalach is still PA. and farmers didnt have the option of branching out.
seriously are you fucking with me? I'm wasting time anyway, I don't really care if it's spent arguing history with someone. on the contrary.
Fair enough.
I thought that was myth anyways? Like that one about Abraham Lincoln being unable to tell a lie.
Arguably slower growth to their profits or even a decrease to profit margins, assuming they were reinvesting the profits into brewing anyways. Given that the tax remained the same across the country regardless of who it effected, I’m still not convinced it was disproportionate nor meant to help big farma stomp out local farms. Maybe I am wrong though.
If I have such a poor understanding of the events, then I’m going to pull a redditor and ask you to ELI5.
I never argued it wasn’t?
By branching out, do we mean like expanding our land for greater production or something more akin to franchising? Perhaps something different?
No and so long as we don’t take ourselves too seriously, this should remain a good experience.
Okay then, I’m sorry if I’ve been an ass. There have been a lot of undercover Leftists on this site recently. Given their propensity for smearing and demonizing our history, it’s really hard to tell.
So close we can smell it. You have 80 million supporters behind you in spite of the constant propaganda we're being shoved down our throats, never forget that!
In the last few weeks Trump
Quite a white pill
What does a white pill mean? I know back pill, but white?
It’s the opposite of a black pill. Think the opposite of dooming. White pills are high energy
Closer to the 6th. Where the last 4 years was a larp or preparation for a fight we knew wed have to have.
Chinese propagandist detected
Not even remotely congruent with what has happened in the last 4 years. Even mentioning the possibility is absurd.
Anyone that thinks this is even a possibility is a shill cuck
By the looks of your post, it looks like we both enjoy CCP cocks up our ass.
I disagree. Trump has awoken millions to the corruption and the Truth of the matter that we are at war with the Radical Left and the Deep State Cabal.
He may leave office if we the people don’t show up and support him. His movement has grown far bigger than himself. In office or not, Patriots now know what we are up against and we know that war is likely the only way out.
I’ll say this as far as “suppressed news”. The thing about the negative publicity they gave Trump in 2016-2020 is that it was still publicity. They realized “we can’t even talk about him. Because the more we talk about him even if it’s bad. The more popular he becomes. So let’s just not talk about him at all.” I don’t think the Trump team realizes the incredible gift they have given him, he could really do anything and they won’t report on it. Let me repeat...ANY. THING.
Great! This is exactly the kind of thing I want to hear! Thanks for posting this!
Ohh, baby. I'm so close. Don't move. Don't move. I'm soo close....Oooooohhh!
You've been reading my mind.
Oh PLEASE! You arent going to go burn anything down. Its great fun to talk smack on an internet board but its all you are going to do. If you were anything more than talk talk talk we would have heard about your arrest by now. Stop playing tough guy and go do something meaningful.
And talking is all you're ever going to do, tough guy.
Yeah, walk that tough talk back. No surprises. Later
Calling out asshats who say things like elections are meaningless and our only recourse is to burn everything down. Which makes everyone on the site look bad. Which gives creedence to our critics when they call us violent exremists. Just to make themselves sound tough.
So dont go all moral high ground. You came out with the BS post about burning things down, trying to sound like a tough guy when you're clearly not. Since then you've tried to weasel out and turn it around like I'm the bad person for calling out your call for violence.
Now its time for you to go away and stop embarrasing yourself.
WE NEED A MASTER LIST
OF 'ALL THE FRAUD CASES THE JUSTICES HAVE TOSSED OUT ON 'TECHNICALITIES'
WHILE SPECIFICALLY IGNORING THE . . .
EVIDENCE OF MASSIVE VOTE FRAUD.
Alabama Is coming through for the us. Mo Brooks and Tommy Tuberville are true Patriots helping POTUS Make America Great Again!
Doug Jones in 2018 was also fraud.
I may be wrong but I think this may be the last shot at getting justice via the SCOTUS. It’s filed by Sidney Powell. She wants to present the evidence of fraud in four states (Michigan, Georgia, Arizona and Wisconsin). She wants to consolidate all cases into one.
Arizona and Wisconsin filings were rejected for unknown reasons while in the other two the defendants (Michigan & Georgia) were given a date to respond as January 14, 2021. Ms. Powell has filed a petition to expedite the cases.
https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/20-815.html
At this point I have ZERO faith in the Supreme Court.
When Pence throws this to a Contingent Election, the dems will go tot the Supreme Court, if they side with the dems I will agree.
If they do not take the case, then you will see the wisdom of their ways.
US v Throckmorton. Fraud vitiates everything.
There is a podcast with him speaking and saying this!
im hungover.... what is the context?
I know Jerome Corsi on the Cats Roundtable this morning was pretty confident Trump will pull it out. He seemed to think it was very significant they stopped updating the Biden gender transition team. Felt maybe they were already arresting people and keeping it under wraps.
Cross the fucking Rubicon