He's got to adds to the end game, you see the supreme court are demonstrating that they have no intention of enforcing law & order thus the potus has to step in, maybe there were THREATS made which we kind of know that there was potus can use this he used the word COURAGE alot and probably backed up with legit reports of threats against the JUDGES he's a clever fucka RECEIPT RECEIPT RECEIPT
Receipts are great but death threats are no excuse for not taking the right action. If members of SCOTUS are claiming that then they need to step down.
It's no excuse, of course, but I was always worried about ACB having 7 kids to worry about when the mafia has no qualms whatsoever about killing your family.
That's SEVEN people who'd need extra special security, above and beyond anything I can imagine.
However, I think the Cuban lady judge would still have been a better pick.
I would think that would be the norm for any judge. Getting threats is part of being a judge. You are responsible for locking people up or favoring for a side the other may differ from.
Tow of the five have balls, always did. It is the three posers who completely took us in who are lacking. But then again, we think President Trump appointed these three but did Mitch McConnell really get them on to the SC, and did Mitch give them a call just before the Texas decision?
its the globalist mentality of seeing every wretched creature on earth as oppressed as opposed to evil and flawed. "oh what a cute baby rattle snake let me just give it a hug. oh wait the rattle snake bit me. its not because it is a rattlesnake its because it is oppressed". these elites who live in ivory towers should be made to suffer the consequences of their own actions.
Thats not quite right. The oppresion narrative is not out of the kindness of theor hearts. Its a Marxist ideology designed to appeal to people saying "theres nothing wrong with you, youre oppressed, is everyone elses fault for oppressing you and you have a right to take their stuff in reparation.
With this they push their ideology of victimhood and hate that so many people love but its a disguise for Socialism and Communism. The people eat each other and the Globalists then take over.
Standing isn't something you globally have or don't have, it depends on the case you're trying to make. Seems like you don't really understand much about long-standing legal principles.
Here I'll dumb it down so even you can understand:
My bakery gets burned to the ground by a rioter. I have standing to sue as my legal rights were violated. My friend has no standing to sue on my behalf.
My friend's bakery gets burned to the ground by a rioter. I have no standing to sue on his behalf, as my legal rights were not violated. My friend however does have standing to sue.
Syntax error. Gotta throw the whole thing out! Annnnnnnnd it’s gone. Next case. A garage door pull shaped like a WHAT!?!? Dispatch the FBI immediately!!!!!
I said something similar to that and had my old account suspended.. hmmm at any rate, in an attempt to not be suspended I will simply say that I cautiously share that belief
It would interesting to see Texas Rangers going to PA, MI, WI, and GA and intercepting/stopping their "certified" electors so only the repulican electors arrive in DC to be counted.
If/when the SCOTUS asks "why would you do this" Texas says "you said we had no standing thus this was the only way for us to resolve our dispute".
That whole story is a LARP, and even if it wasn't, the other judges allowing themselves to be scared into not taking action doesn't mean they couldn't have taken action. That would simply mean they're just as cucked as Roberts.
The Chief Justice can't legally prevent the other justices from voting to hear a case.
They are starting to give a fuck or Roberts wouldn't have retorted over the weekend. More pressure on that fucker in particular is necessary. Overwhelm his office with calls and emails. We should have a sticky through Jan 6 detailing the lawlessness of this court and this chief justice.
He won't if he is smart. That'll give the allegations legs. Nobody outside of this place and a few twitter posts are discussing the substance. He only responded to the Texas allegations.
The Jews operate through supporting the Chinese to challenge US hegemony. Nothing benefits them more than the US/China getting into a conflict and them playing both sides.
Cant use standing, since he is the candidate. Cant use laches, since they made the rule changes just before the election, plus Alito told them to seperate and they didnt. That leaves non-determinative, meaning even if we decide in your favor you still wouldnt win the election anyway, so sorry.
So it will be very interesting to see if they take the case and how they decide. the suit is fairly readable, only about 50 pages double spaced so not a huge time expenditure. Looks winnable to my poor addled non-legal minded brain.
The Chief Justice is getting leaned on hard. CCP, Dems, big money influencers... and there really is a hierarchy. Alito and Thomas can’t be fucked with, which is probably why they were allowed to dissent, but the three newbies are not as independent as we like to think. If JR really was “screaming” to keep them in line, they must have at least tried. SCOTUS is just as political as Congress, with wheeling, dealing, and threats, they are not sacred or special. Just politicians like the rest.
“ Parties who are not satisfied with the decision of a lower court must petition the U.S. Supreme Court to hear their case. The primary means to petition the court for review is to ask it to grant a writ of certiorari. This is a request that the Supreme Court order a lower court to send up the record of the case for review. The Court usually is not under any obligation to hear these cases, and it usually only does so if the case could have national significance, might harmonize conflicting decisions in the federal Circuit courts, and/or could have precedential value. In fact, the Court accepts 100-150 of the more than 7,000 cases that it is asked to review each year....
The Supreme Court has its own set of rules. According to these rules, four of the nine Justices must vote to accept a case.“
What does that mean? He isn't gonna do anything. He could have enacted martial law this summer. He should have. Had he drained th swamp after the Mueller investigation we wouldn't even be here!
He could have fired EVERYONE in the fbi and replaced them with people who were all on obama and the CCP's payroll. He didn't! If he had there would have been DOJ boots on the ground in all these stolen states by 9am on 11-4-2020. Obama did all this with his still standing shadow government and Trump allowed it by not draining the swamp. He has no one to enforce the law because they'll all Obama, desperate, and CCP hacks in the FBI, CIA, DOJ.
Can't believe Trump didn't file this before PA Supreme Court made the decision. Everyone knows that its too late now because laches. Trump surely has an oracle predicting which way the court is leaning. He should fire the oracle immediately for not advising him to file pre-emptive suits.
I was being sarcastic. And the appeal was after PA SC made their decision. Fuckin bullshit laches. File before election: No injury = no standing. File after election: should have filed before, laches = no standing. Heads I win, Tails you lose.
There haven't been any cases that were dismissed on standing because of a lack of injury-in-fact, then refiled and dismissed on laches. Some people have tried to conflate wildly different cases to make this claim, but it has no basis in reality.
The reality is that Trump and the GOP did file many cases before the election that did not get dismissed on standing. They won some of them, and lost some of them on grounds other than standing. This is all shit you can easily look up yourself.
Nobody is saying that actually happened. That is what would happen. File early, you'll get booted for no injury. And since they hadn't filed early, they've been kicked for laches. These PA cases are different ones. But as far as I know, Trump was never even a party to the 3 of them. I think it was the state republican party, a member of the state senate, and perhaps a group of electors. Laches is fake anyways because constitutional injuries cannot be dismissed for laches. I'll have to pull them up again to refresh my memory. I do not like PA's citizen access portal, lexis/westlaw do not have much of the filings even though they should have been in the bill of exceptions sent with the appeal. Doubtful scotus docket has anything either.
Ya, if it is imminent. You could never assert election laws are going to inflict imminent injury. It has to be more than speculative. Which you'd never be able to assert in this circumstance. Because he did not file these suits prior to the election, we cannot possibly know the answer to this. But my opinion is that they would duck them similarly.
To me, this is all so President Trump can say "we tried everything through the courts, federal level, state, local elections" etc.. I tried to give you all the opportunity to unfuck yourselves, so now, this is on you.
At first I had high hopes for SCOTUS. I really thought they would be the saving grace. They need to step up for me to have any confidence in them ever again.
I hate to say it but the SCOTUS is assho, at this point Roberts and Breyer along with the other lib shit dicks in robes seem to be running the show. The "conservative" justices seem to be fucking abject cowards with the exception of Thomas. I'm all for insurrection act and if need be martial law to take the Republic back from the CCP infiltrated government. Legal angle has been well tried and they're ALL against Trump. Tired of commie justices who are on the CCP payroll telling Trump to fuck off.
Wait they changed the laws back to what they were before? I knew they changed the rules but never read that they changed them back after. Thats even more suspicious.
1 state doesn't matter at this point. PA can be reversed and given to Trump, it doesn't change a damn thing, Biden still has over 270. A victory would be great, but unless we see something happen with GA and MI this isn't a route to victory unfortunately.
A win is a win. A favorable ruling in this case opens the door to getting rulings in GA and WI at least that reverse similar actions in those states. And PA, WI and GA = 46 EC votes and thats a win, friend!
This door needed to be opened weeks ago. I believe the legal ship has largely sailed at this point. Christmas and New Years really put a damper on timelines
Its actually a quick slide to get this far this fast. Like Rudy said, the lower courts kind of did them a favor by ruling against them so quickly. And they have to wait until the vote is certified to be "injured". Which is why these states took weeks to do what should have been done the next day, to give Trump as little time as possible to fight this. It will be interesting to see how the courts react to this latest suit.
Since the Pennsylvania legislature is NOT complaining that its state regulators made changes to the States election laws without their consent, and are fine with those changes, how can a Third Party cry foul?
If the Penn legislatures were complaining about these changes, the fact that the state regulators went around them in violation of the state’s constitution would be their justification. However, they are NOT complaining.
This will be interesting, considering Alito told them to separate the ballots coming in past 8 pm on Election Day and he got a big fuck you from PA. They need to hear this case...if not it’s insurrection act time.
okay MR. President, show us. show us how much our trusted institutions are worth now. if SCOTUS fails to uphold the constitution, then we should no longer abide by their judgements.
They've made their decisions, Now they can enforce them.... because we wont.
Finding procedural justification to throw the case out in three... Two... One...
Ya everytime I see something new at SCROTUS, I don't even feel hope going that route.
But who knows, maybe the 5 will grow balls sometime before Jan 6.
He's got to adds to the end game, you see the supreme court are demonstrating that they have no intention of enforcing law & order thus the potus has to step in, maybe there were THREATS made which we kind of know that there was potus can use this he used the word COURAGE alot and probably backed up with legit reports of threats against the JUDGES he's a clever fucka RECEIPT RECEIPT RECEIPT
Receipts are great but death threats are no excuse for not taking the right action. If members of SCOTUS are claiming that then they need to step down.
[AOC logs into Twitch]
It's no excuse, of course, but I was always worried about ACB having 7 kids to worry about when the mafia has no qualms whatsoever about killing your family.
That's SEVEN people who'd need extra special security, above and beyond anything I can imagine.
However, I think the Cuban lady judge would still have been a better pick.
Was she unaware of the dangers of the job when she agreed to it?
I would think that would be the norm for any judge. Getting threats is part of being a judge. You are responsible for locking people up or favoring for a side the other may differ from.
If he proves there is no law and order, no constitution, then there is no election, no congress, no supreme court, just loyalty and command.
SCROTUS - Supreme Court Retards Of The United States
Supremely Corrupt Retarded Unscrupulous Scum.
Empty SCROTUS at that
Tow of the five have balls, always did. It is the three posers who completely took us in who are lacking. But then again, we think President Trump appointed these three but did Mitch McConnell really get them on to the SC, and did Mitch give them a call just before the Texas decision?
Crazy, isn't it? Hostile foreign invaders and terrorists (domestic and foreign) are treated with kid gloves and protected.
MUH WAR ON TERROR
Look, Fat. Your nothing but a bitter-clinging rootin-tootin Elmer Fudd wannabe. If your mad just fire a shotgun in the air. Worked with cornpop.
bidenisms
Relax brah, it was sarcasm. Thought you would realize it with all the Biden quotes. Read it again in Biden’s voice k?
No harm, no foul. I just try to interject some levity now and then. MAGA on and MAGA as hard as you can.
You haven’t heard him talk like this or say similar things? Have you been living under a rock? 😂
I just spit out my beer when I first read “Look fat” in Biden’s voice. Hilarious 😆
its the globalist mentality of seeing every wretched creature on earth as oppressed as opposed to evil and flawed. "oh what a cute baby rattle snake let me just give it a hug. oh wait the rattle snake bit me. its not because it is a rattlesnake its because it is oppressed". these elites who live in ivory towers should be made to suffer the consequences of their own actions.
Thats not quite right. The oppresion narrative is not out of the kindness of theor hearts. Its a Marxist ideology designed to appeal to people saying "theres nothing wrong with you, youre oppressed, is everyone elses fault for oppressing you and you have a right to take their stuff in reparation.
With this they push their ideology of victimhood and hate that so many people love but its a disguise for Socialism and Communism. The people eat each other and the Globalists then take over.
Standing isn't something you globally have or don't have, it depends on the case you're trying to make. Seems like you don't really understand much about long-standing legal principles.
Here I'll dumb it down so even you can understand:
My bakery gets burned to the ground by a rioter. I have standing to sue as my legal rights were violated. My friend has no standing to sue on my behalf.
My friend's bakery gets burned to the ground by a rioter. I have no standing to sue on his behalf, as my legal rights were not violated. My friend however does have standing to sue.
You'd have standing on your part of the block that got burned down.
Begone ignorant fool.
"Oops! Autocorrect changed SCOTUS to SCROTUS! Case dismissed!"
Syntax error. Gotta throw the whole thing out! Annnnnnnnd it’s gone. Next case. A garage door pull shaped like a WHAT!?!? Dispatch the FBI immediately!!!!!
Which is good. Gives Trump more ammo to target scotus
Its too cold outside to reverse these decisions!
Please wake up scotus
The only thing that will wake up SCOTUS is if we cause far more civil unrest from their betrayal than the left would cause if they stopped the steal
Honestly unless they saw violent right-wing death squads they won't do shit. The former isn't going to ever happen so to the latter...
I'm not sure what to think of this. It's scary.
The very fact that I don't know what to think of this is scary.
They are lethal, that’s what.
Basically we need to start shooting.
I said something similar to that and had my old account suspended.. hmmm at any rate, in an attempt to not be suspended I will simply say that I cautiously share that belief
It would interesting to see Texas Rangers going to PA, MI, WI, and GA and intercepting/stopping their "certified" electors so only the repulican electors arrive in DC to be counted.
If/when the SCOTUS asks "why would you do this" Texas says "you said we had no standing thus this was the only way for us to resolve our dispute".
That is a brilliant idea. Someone get Lion Ted on the phone.
Wake the fuck up. They damn well know what’s going on though. These are smart people. They know damn well.
They also know we are coming this time.
Their call on our attitudes when we get there.
Wake up . . . . and smell the ashes.
There's only one heady!
Welcome to City 17. You have chosen, or been chosen, to...
When Chief Justice is a deep state operative it’s pointless you could have 8-1 majority and the cunt will refuse to take the case.
He WILL take the case! Either by his own volition or via suppository!
The Chief Justice doesn't have that kind of power.
Seems like he does since he was literally responsible for them not taking the Texas case by whining/bitching and scaring the judges about riots.
That whole story is a LARP, and even if it wasn't, the other judges allowing themselves to be scared into not taking action doesn't mean they couldn't have taken action. That would simply mean they're just as cucked as Roberts.
The Chief Justice can't legally prevent the other justices from voting to hear a case.
The only thing that will wake up SCOTUS is something loud on the order of 160 Db.
It's called 'Election Day' for a reason.
Not 'Election Stop Counting When We Lose And Steal It In The Middle Of The Night Day.'
What the Fuck is so hard for our Supreme Court not to understand what is going on?
I guess we have to SHOW them what happens when they do not uphold their Constitutional Duties.
Deus Vult.
I really wish comments like yours were not censored around Twitter. Amazing point.
Oh I'm sure the Supreme Court's really going to give a fuck..
We need to physically round these people up and hold our own trials it's starting to get close to that time all I'm waiting for is the order.
They are starting to give a fuck or Roberts wouldn't have retorted over the weekend. More pressure on that fucker in particular is necessary. Overwhelm his office with calls and emails. We should have a sticky through Jan 6 detailing the lawlessness of this court and this chief justice.
he hasn't come out and denied the allegations to my knowledge
He won't if he is smart. That'll give the allegations legs. Nobody outside of this place and a few twitter posts are discussing the substance. He only responded to the Texas allegations.
Pretty sure that was fake news as SCOTUS has been operating remotely since the covid bs started.
Bro we owe you one.
SCOTSA: Supreme Court of the Second Amendment
Last chance SCOTUS, last chance! GA, MI, WI, AZ coming soon after you as well...
SCOTUS doesn't care. The CCP money is too good.
They provide good lolli-pops. Oh and great lines of white sugar. They love their candy at the CCP headquarters.
It's the jews not the chinese
The Jews operate through supporting the Chinese to challenge US hegemony. Nothing benefits them more than the US/China getting into a conflict and them playing both sides.
Why not both?
It's the Chinese Jews
I doubt all of the judges are bought by the ccp, I think it’s more they are afraid I guess from the left probably threatening to kill their family.
Procedural justification to throw it out: "Well the three cases are redundant you only need one...so we're throwing all three out, oh well"
Always something stupid.
"Laches" aka you shoulda known they were gonna cheat before they did.
Cant use standing, since he is the candidate. Cant use laches, since they made the rule changes just before the election, plus Alito told them to seperate and they didnt. That leaves non-determinative, meaning even if we decide in your favor you still wouldnt win the election anyway, so sorry.
So it will be very interesting to see if they take the case and how they decide. the suit is fairly readable, only about 50 pages double spaced so not a huge time expenditure. Looks winnable to my poor addled non-legal minded brain.
I like to think that by filing this Trump is giving John Roberts some additional rope so he can hang himself.
Correct 👍
I think he's using it to make a hammock.
The Chief Justice is getting leaned on hard. CCP, Dems, big money influencers... and there really is a hierarchy. Alito and Thomas can’t be fucked with, which is probably why they were allowed to dissent, but the three newbies are not as independent as we like to think. If JR really was “screaming” to keep them in line, they must have at least tried. SCOTUS is just as political as Congress, with wheeling, dealing, and threats, they are not sacred or special. Just politicians like the rest.
That's all Trump does!
We can give him every yard of rope on Earth. But without an executioner, no one hangs.
We are nearing the hour of having to become that executioner. 1/6. Be ready. It ends there.
Trump is doing this to make sure every legal recourse is taken before he does cross that line.
I’m ready. I’m fucking ready.
They will definitely rule in Trumps favor
You forgot to close your sarc tag
“Supreme” court:
BREAKING: 7 of 9 Supreme Court Justices forget how to read Latin after taking Coof Vaccine.
Sadly, they only know old French which is close to Latin.
They should filed this in 1775 anything after that is considered MoOt
“ Parties who are not satisfied with the decision of a lower court must petition the U.S. Supreme Court to hear their case. The primary means to petition the court for review is to ask it to grant a writ of certiorari. This is a request that the Supreme Court order a lower court to send up the record of the case for review. The Court usually is not under any obligation to hear these cases, and it usually only does so if the case could have national significance, might harmonize conflicting decisions in the federal Circuit courts, and/or could have precedential value. In fact, the Court accepts 100-150 of the more than 7,000 cases that it is asked to review each year....
The Supreme Court has its own set of rules. According to these rules, four of the nine Justices must vote to accept a case.“
https://www.uscourts.gov/about-federal-courts/educational-resources/about-educational-outreach/activity-resources/supreme-1
Dismissed because no standing!!!!!!!
What does that mean? He isn't gonna do anything. He could have enacted martial law this summer. He should have. Had he drained th swamp after the Mueller investigation we wouldn't even be here!
He could have fired EVERYONE in the fbi and replaced them with people who were all on obama and the CCP's payroll. He didn't! If he had there would have been DOJ boots on the ground in all these stolen states by 9am on 11-4-2020. Obama did all this with his still standing shadow government and Trump allowed it by not draining the swamp. He has no one to enforce the law because they'll all Obama, desperate, and CCP hacks in the FBI, CIA, DOJ.
Federal Judges were alot more based back when they all wore powdered wigs.
I was updoot 420! I think I win something...
Slam dunk case but there's no way SCOTUS is going to remove millions of votes.
No standing!!!!!
what took so long? any other states? they all have the same problems
Can't believe Trump didn't file this before PA Supreme Court made the decision. Everyone knows that its too late now because laches. Trump surely has an oracle predicting which way the court is leaning. He should fire the oracle immediately for not advising him to file pre-emptive suits.
They did, and the SCOTUS ruled 4-4 as ACB wasn't on the court then.
I was being sarcastic. And the appeal was after PA SC made their decision. Fuckin bullshit laches. File before election: No injury = no standing. File after election: should have filed before, laches = no standing. Heads I win, Tails you lose.
Huh? That case wasn't rejected due to standing.
There haven't been any cases that were dismissed on standing because of a lack of injury-in-fact, then refiled and dismissed on laches. Some people have tried to conflate wildly different cases to make this claim, but it has no basis in reality.
The reality is that Trump and the GOP did file many cases before the election that did not get dismissed on standing. They won some of them, and lost some of them on grounds other than standing. This is all shit you can easily look up yourself.
Nobody is saying that actually happened. That is what would happen. File early, you'll get booted for no injury. And since they hadn't filed early, they've been kicked for laches. These PA cases are different ones. But as far as I know, Trump was never even a party to the 3 of them. I think it was the state republican party, a member of the state senate, and perhaps a group of electors. Laches is fake anyways because constitutional injuries cannot be dismissed for laches. I'll have to pull them up again to refresh my memory. I do not like PA's citizen access portal, lexis/westlaw do not have much of the filings even though they should have been in the bill of exceptions sent with the appeal. Doubtful scotus docket has anything either.
No, that's not what would happen, and in fact did not happen with many of the pre-election lawsuits. If the injury is imminent you have standing.
Ya, if it is imminent. You could never assert election laws are going to inflict imminent injury. It has to be more than speculative. Which you'd never be able to assert in this circumstance. Because he did not file these suits prior to the election, we cannot possibly know the answer to this. But my opinion is that they would duck them similarly.
You can, and similar suits were in fact filed pre-election.
We can deduce it from the fact that similar suits didn't fail on standing pre-election.
I expect nothing from ACB after the Texas lawsuit ruling.
To me, this is all so President Trump can say "we tried everything through the courts, federal level, state, local elections" etc.. I tried to give you all the opportunity to unfuck yourselves, so now, this is on you.
enact martial law
I wish. I hope. I pray
At first I had high hopes for SCOTUS. I really thought they would be the saving grace. They need to step up for me to have any confidence in them ever again.
aaawww shiiiiiet here we go again 😉
Ah shit, here we go again
I hate to say it but the SCOTUS is assho, at this point Roberts and Breyer along with the other lib shit dicks in robes seem to be running the show. The "conservative" justices seem to be fucking abject cowards with the exception of Thomas. I'm all for insurrection act and if need be martial law to take the Republic back from the CCP infiltrated government. Legal angle has been well tried and they're ALL against Trump. Tired of commie justices who are on the CCP payroll telling Trump to fuck off.
Is it sternly worded?
I'm not holding my breath here. SCOTUS doesn't care about this country.
Cool. Everybody go loot a friggin Walmart so Roberts will take us seriously this time.
This must have been what Boris was referring to on the War Room
Wait they changed the laws back to what they were before? I knew they changed the rules but never read that they changed them back after. Thats even more suspicious.
1 state doesn't matter at this point. PA can be reversed and given to Trump, it doesn't change a damn thing, Biden still has over 270. A victory would be great, but unless we see something happen with GA and MI this isn't a route to victory unfortunately.
A win is a win. A favorable ruling in this case opens the door to getting rulings in GA and WI at least that reverse similar actions in those states. And PA, WI and GA = 46 EC votes and thats a win, friend!
This door needed to be opened weeks ago. I believe the legal ship has largely sailed at this point. Christmas and New Years really put a damper on timelines
Stephen Miller doesnt agree. Trump's lawyers dont agree or they wouldnt have bothered. I think they probably know more than we do.
RIGHT WING DEATH SQUADS IF THE SUPREME COURT BETRAYES US AGAIN.
I googled "writ of Clitoris", but didn't find anything other than "Certified Perfect Poon"... What am I doing wrong?
What a writ of certiorari is
in Before John Roberts throw a hissy fit with his justices
This is a much stronger case
Three home run issues. Legislatures must decide Pres election laws, not bureucrats and judges. Equal protection. Due process.
There’s less of an issue of standing
Yes, you are correct. I have recently become more educated on the subject. Good read^
The only remedy I think SCOTUS can do is allow legislatures to choose. Constitutionally speaking.
Is there any way SCOTUS can get back to work?
Why the hell was this filed so late
Had to work its way up through the lower courts first. This is the court that really matters.
Its actually a quick slide to get this far this fast. Like Rudy said, the lower courts kind of did them a favor by ruling against them so quickly. And they have to wait until the vote is certified to be "injured". Which is why these states took weeks to do what should have been done the next day, to give Trump as little time as possible to fight this. It will be interesting to see how the courts react to this latest suit.
Since the Pennsylvania legislature is NOT complaining that its state regulators made changes to the States election laws without their consent, and are fine with those changes, how can a Third Party cry foul?
If the Penn legislatures were complaining about these changes, the fact that the state regulators went around them in violation of the state’s constitution would be their justification. However, they are NOT complaining.
Can’t the president call the Supreme Court together and make them give a detailed explanation as to why it was rejected?
This will be interesting, considering Alito told them to separate the ballots coming in past 8 pm on Election Day and he got a big fuck you from PA. They need to hear this case...if not it’s insurrection act time.
okay MR. President, show us. show us how much our trusted institutions are worth now. if SCOTUS fails to uphold the constitution, then we should no longer abide by their judgements.
They've made their decisions, Now they can enforce them.... because we wont.
Thanks to "Justice" Roberts we now know that only might makes right.