7830
Comments (449)
sorted by:
475
ProphetOfKek 475 points ago +483 / -8

This will be heard on 1/22/21.

427
deleted 427 points ago +435 / -8
183
deleted 183 points ago +190 / -7
186
deleted 186 points ago +188 / -2
136
iamjohnwick 136 points ago +138 / -2

Well we now have an opportunity to SHOW them what we look like. Up close and in person. There are going to be millions of people in DC on the 6th. All there to support Trump and protest the treason/coup that’s been perpetrated on America. That day is their one and only warning, as on that day those millions of Patriots will not be there with the intent to cause harm. However, it will give them a glimpse of just how overwhelming our numbers are.

Once they see it with their own eyes, it won’t be hard for them to imagine what happens if they don’t act, or bitch out, or not take what’s happening deadly fucking seriously and decline again to hear the arguments of our case, and us Patriots reappear loaded for bear and WITH the intent to do harm.

Literally the largest standing army in the world will descend upon them like locusts to the crop fields.

71
Thep1mp 71 points ago +72 / -1

Yup. And this is the one time I will be wearing a mask. They want masks? Okie dokie!

34
DroolingElmo 34 points ago +34 / -0

Mine will be a skeleton face

22
Thep1mp 22 points ago +23 / -1

Mine will be a full ski mask.

5
HockeyMom4Trump 5 points ago +5 / -0

I highly recommend masks! You know, to keep everyone safe from muh covid. Wear a huge one. Cover the majority of your face.

7
TheMoreYouKnowOkay 7 points ago +7 / -0

Wear a balaclava. Stay warm, stay anonymous.

36
Paradyme 36 points ago +36 / -0

It’s good to see John Wick is on our side.

24
JuicyfearsMAGA 24 points ago +25 / -1

They'll laugh in our faces if they don't do the right thing and there is still no consequences for treason

27
Kraznaya 27 points ago +28 / -1

Yeah, this is the issue. Why would they think the next time would be any different? If we show up and complain, they'll just laugh and keep going cause all we'll do is complain but ultimately take it.

This can't be a warning rally. It must be the moment we mete out the justice our corrupt system desperately needs.

17
JuicyfearsMAGA 17 points ago +17 / -0

We don't want it to come to that, of course, but if it does, and all indications are it will, we must act to preserve everything

15
Lady_MaGa 15 points ago +15 / -0

Be the Randy Quaid character from the movie Inependence Day. He was old, he was a patriot, and he gave himself to save the world.

8
DroolingElmo 8 points ago +8 / -0

Death to tyrants

7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
2
iamjohnwick 2 points ago +2 / -0

I’m not sure what that means?

7
JuicyfearsMAGA 7 points ago +7 / -0

It means the reality is them just seeing us in those numbers won't be enough to deter their continued treason.

4
Andrea_CWB_CND 4 points ago +4 / -0

I really hope they hear us and do the right thing!

3
The_Diesel53 3 points ago +3 / -0

Motherfucking YES!!! This guy has it right! Right here with you, brother!

14
iamjohnwick 14 points ago +14 / -0

Here’s what I know:

Trump hasn’t conceded. Heels Up Harris hasn’t resigned her post in the senate, which should have probably already happened by now considering previous administrations. The “across the board” message from EVERYONE on the Trump team is still a steadfast “we will win!” Many active lawsuits (I’m skeptical and cynical about this considering how the courts have been with previous ones), the Trump EO which doom fags are saying won’t get used. That’s the “kill switch” option of last resort in my opinion.

But mostly President Trump has not conceded, and he hasn’t said “I’m calling forth the militia, and invoking the 2018 EO and the Insurrection act. I hereby deputize every one of the people who voted for me, get to work”which should be everything we need to know for now.

So we show up in DC on the 6th by the millions....peacefully (I expect some small skirmishes with Pantifa and the BLM cucks, but nothing big) to tell our politicians:

“this is us pleading with you to not press forward with this insanity...for if you do the next time you see us you’ll be staring down our gun barrels. And there will be nothing you can do to stop it.”

8
The_Diesel53 8 points ago +8 / -0

I believe this is sound reasoning. I'm thinking that the courts are all corrupt in regards to the lawsuits and that there are a few good people in congress, but not enough. I'm thinking the insurrection/martial law option is probably what's going to happen. I think it's been stated that there are over 1,000 people in the U.S. in bed with China on this. I think the military, i.e. Army Special Forces, will be primarily involved with rounding up these treasonous swine. I think that there is a TON of evidence that has been gathered by the military and other sources with regards to the election that happened in November, AND the fraud that has happened in previous years. I've even heard a rumor that Trump was actively recruited by the military to run for President in order to end the deep state corruption. Don't know how true that is but it's a very interesting thing to think about. I think Sidney Powell and others are qualified to try people in a military tribunal. Regardless, I have a good feeling that Trump will remain as our President, and that we're going to be alright in the end. I remain vigilant with hope and prayer and I would ask everyone to pray for our great nation and our great President.

1
M25WhiteFeather 1 point ago +1 / -0

“this is us demanding with you to not press forward with this insanity...for if you do the next time you see us you’ll be staring down our gun barrels. And there will be nothing you can do to stop it.”

FTFY. Don't plead.

30
unicornpoop 30 points ago +30 / -0

ALL of those cowardly mother fuckers need to be forced to resign for failure to uphold their duty. If you can't handle democrat threats then you aren't cut out for the job.

11
DroolingElmo 11 points ago +11 / -0

Military tribunals

11
Carry_Your_Name 11 points ago +11 / -0

Roberts definitely has to go. He's the one blocking the cases behind the scenes. Also, he's on Epstein's list.

4
Random_Aussie 4 points ago +4 / -0

I would laugh if GEOTUS publicly drops the dirt or Roberts just before SCOTUS is due to rule on some big case.

Get rekt.

1
Carry_Your_Name 1 point ago +1 / -0

Tell you what, the real purpose of the Texas lawsuit in particular was exposing Roberts and perhaps some others associated with him. Trump has been takeing hard military actions behind the scene. At this point you gotta have faith, not just in God, but in some tidbits of these actions such as Frankfurt shootout with CIA, seizing servers, arresting Gina Haspel and some other swamp rats, troop deployment in swing states, appointing Powell as special counsel, stuffs like that. Bottom line is, he won't put his fate in the hands of other people, not Roberts, not McConnel, not Ratcliffe. When it seems like he is banging his head on the wall, he's actually letting them rat themselves out as Never Trumpers who's only using him for their own gains.

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
20
TenScoops 20 points ago +20 / -0

sweet sweet China cash for a teeny weeny bit of election fraud, c'mon man

8
DroolingElmo 8 points ago +8 / -0

Would be laughing if it wasn't so true 😔

11
Palmertabs 11 points ago +11 / -0

This shouldn’t even be a issue, they should have followed the law as written.

7
notmydirtyalt 7 points ago +7 / -0

Well hopefully on the 4th of Jan if SCOTUS wants to submit to mob rule then they will have no problem if their building finds itself look like downtown Baghdad.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
48
Captain_MAGA 48 points ago +50 / -2

COWABUNGA IT IS

35
deleted 35 points ago +38 / -3
7
Alarm_1 7 points ago +7 / -0

Posilutely

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
44
GeoG85 44 points ago +44 / -0

Who'll rule in favor?

Our leaders? Trump's our leader.

Our chosen voice? I voted for Trump - he's my chosen voice.

WHO will RULE against US? Who will REPRESENT us? By the people, for the people.

Would you open your doors willingly let in someone to rape your daughter, even if they say "They have 'legal documents'"? Or would you still stand with God, and Trump in your heart, and fight fight FIGHT?

Human law is written by whatever corrupt tyrant in charge - but law itself, can be noble.

17
OhShnigums 17 points ago +22 / -5

No standing because election over

25
I_Love_45-70_Gov 25 points ago +26 / -1

No Standing because Constitution over....

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
1
M25WhiteFeather 1 point ago +1 / -0

No Roberts because Constitution over?

17
deleted 17 points ago +18 / -1
11
Taupkek 11 points ago +11 / -0

Campaign says nothing is exhausted until Jan 20. Thats the date to watch.

14
deleted 14 points ago +14 / -0
7
Taupkek 7 points ago +8 / -1

The lawsuit claims that even if Biden is inaugurated the issue is still not moot and the court could still rule in Trump's favor. A bold statement, to be sure!

12
deleted 12 points ago +12 / -0
5
Taupkek 5 points ago +5 / -0

You and me both. There is a small chance they didnt want to take the case to keep from looking like they decided the election and would thus forever become the deciders of election in every future election. This case is an opportunity for them to do the job they wee hired to do. We'll see if they take it.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
9
uooobeato 9 points ago +11 / -2

Ngl this sounds like just moving the goal post over and over.

First it was a week or two after the elections, then it was 2 weeks because the Kraken and whatnot, then it was until the EC votes, then it was some other date due to some EO, now it is Jan 6th, if nothing happens it's gonna be inauguration date and now you're saying inauguration date doesn't really matter that much, in the end you're pushing the date over and over forever lol.

At this point this is starting to look more and more like what the Dems did in 2016, although there is a lot of fucking evidence in this case and the voter fraud was fucking obvious. But at some point you've got to give up, unless you don't mind doing the same your enemy did for 4 years.

3
Taupkek 3 points ago +4 / -1

It sucks doesnt it? The problem is there is such a short amount of time to investigate, make a case, present it, and run it up and down and back up the appeals ladder to SCOTUS, which is where its going to end up anyway. This is a (hopefully) once in a lifetime event. I'm very curious to see if SCOTUS takes the case and rules on it in a timely manner.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
DroolingElmo 1 point ago +1 / -0

Not quite, but I am prepared to fight and die if necessary.

15
the-new-style 15 points ago +18 / -3

The inauguration can be ruled as invalid.

19
uooobeato 19 points ago +19 / -0

They don't have the balls to defend the law because it'll go against the Dems and right now Trump is still president. Do you think they'll have the balls to do it after Biden has been inaugurated?

2
TheMoreYouKnowOkay 2 points ago +2 / -0

The reason why we have so many checks and balances in the system leading up to the inauguration is so that no inauguration can be ruled as invalid.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
russianbot4673 1 point ago +1 / -0

sure

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
48
NoMoJoe2020 48 points ago +48 / -0

Thats why they are petitioning for writ of certiorari

33
ProphetOfKek 33 points ago +36 / -3

Ok then whatever bs reason they can to deny or delay will be used.

40
NoMoJoe2020 40 points ago +42 / -2

Yep wouldn't doubt that. But I do expect more shit to leak about Roberts very soon. Maybe the phone call lin has

19
deleted 19 points ago +35 / -16
16
fishyPussy 16 points ago +26 / -10

That’s LARP. Scotus has been working remotely since covid.

18
doug2 18 points ago +21 / -3

Ummm I saw the guy testify. Just because they hold hearing remotely doesn't mean they dont ever convene in person. So sick of this LA4P shit based on the flimsiest of rationale.

5
DaLaohu 5 points ago +6 / -1

Dude. That whole thing about Roberts yelling came from a convicted terrorist's blog. It's fake and gay.

-2
doug2 -2 points ago +1 / -3

no, no it didn't.

3
deleted 3 points ago +4 / -1
15
MrCripple 15 points ago +15 / -0

He is talking about the phone call with Roberts and Benny. Not the yelling towards l the justices foo

10
NoMoJoe2020 10 points ago +10 / -0

The phone call and him screaming behind closed doors are separate things. The screaming thing I know is fake because of the remote work. The phone call may be real.

2
John_McFly 2 points ago +2 / -0

Justice Roberts is working from the Court's building for both the conferences and oral arguments, the other eight justices are working remote.

1
Tendies_or_GTFO 1 point ago +1 / -0

Source on that? I've love to see something (not doubting, legit wanting to know).

10
deleted 10 points ago +10 / -0
0
Tendies_or_GTFO 0 points ago +1 / -1

And SCOTUS justices still have to interact with clerks and so on, SCOTUS isn't just 9 fucking lawyers in robes ... not sure I buy the details, but it is possible that a clerk overheard a conversation via teleconference through a closed door or some other means. Still seems fishy.

The phone call Lin Wood mentioned is a different story, I think.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
9
hlecter 9 points ago +11 / -2

If SCOTUS is remote then Trump has access to the zoom call from the NSA.

8
Dingus 8 points ago +8 / -0

Has there ever been a case where the government came forward with this type of NSA evidence against anyone? I've never heard of any.

2
deleted 2 points ago +3 / -1
2
Endprism 2 points ago +2 / -0

That’s why we need to end programs like prism.

1
deleted 1 point ago +2 / -1
2
hlecter 2 points ago +2 / -0

The Trump Russia impeachment.

6
Thedaythe_redditdied 6 points ago +6 / -0

So I have been super busy all weekend. What did I miss about Roberts?

11
NoMoJoe2020 11 points ago +11 / -0

Comment above is saying it was a larp, but Lin I thought claimed to have audio of Roberts talking to another judge about how he "won't let that fucker back in office" or something along those lines. Although don't think that is new as of this weekend. Basically just lin putting him on blast. Questioning the epstein flight logs. Idk I just having a feeling something else will leak soon with all the focus around roberts and the SC

5
Thedaythe_redditdied 5 points ago +5 / -0

Thanks for the info. It’s so hard to catch up sometimes.

2
ippwndu 2 points ago +2 / -0

And insinuating Epstein is still alive.

-2
I_Love_45-70_Gov -2 points ago +2 / -4

The LARP(?) goes something like this: Texas man testified before Texas Legislative Panel (last week), and claimed a SCOTUS Clerk(?) told him that they overheard Roberts losing his shit in private conference with other Associate Justices. Claimed Roberts intimidated other Justices and refused to hear the original Texas case.

Lin Wood claims to hav a recorded phone conversation between Roberts and Beyers, where Roberts shouts that "That motherfucker will not have a second term!" or something to that effect.

I believe Lin Wood because he posted to separate twaats on twatter, begging for Roberts to dispute the claim.

Roberts has so far not responded.

7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
-6
Deplora -6 points ago +1 / -7

Lin Wood is not to be trusted. He's a huckster who is always looking out for himself and nobody else. Amazing this still needs to be pointed out, after he knocked himself out publicly contradicting President Trump's pleas with Georgia voters to vote in the Senate runoff, telling everyone not to vote in the runoff.

3
fishyPussy 3 points ago +11 / -8

That’s LARP. Scotus has been working remotely since covid.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
12
kudupoo 12 points ago +12 / -0

Is the /s or, is that a fact?

10
ProphetOfKek 10 points ago +10 / -0

Yes.

7
Shakakka99 7 points ago +7 / -0

Then on 1/6 Pence should announce he's deferring the vote count until all standing court cases have been heard.

If that doesn't light a fire under their asses tough shit.

6
okayfilet 6 points ago +6 / -0

nO rEmEdY, sOrrY!

254
deleted 254 points ago +257 / -3
150
kag-2020- 150 points ago +151 / -1

"BUT COMMUNISTS WILL BE MAD" - The Chief Justice of the SCOTUS, 2020

32
AmericaFloats 32 points ago +35 / -3

(and also, 'then i can't fly to pedo-land and malta and greece as easily!' - Chief Faggot Roberts.

18
fuckallcommunists22 18 points ago +19 / -1

Allegedly he wrote essays on bolshevism and marxism in college. So it's not surprising that he is on their side.

4
spezisacuckold 4 points ago +5 / -1

Just saying, I would be so happy seeing communist sympathizers heads chopped off by guillotines in Minecraft. This is totally not inciting anything, I want everything done LEGALLY.

6
JuicyfearsMAGA 6 points ago +6 / -0

The legal remedy to treason is clearly spelled out in the Constitution. This is the last stand for our republic and constitution...the only argument needs to be the means of carrying out the penalty for treason

2
Creepy_Ginger 2 points ago +2 / -0

Muh Feels - Supreme Court of the United Cucks.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
29
bewarethejogger 29 points ago +30 / -1

"I see your Constitution and centuries of legal precedent and raise you Shaniqua and Daquan being mad! Checkmate, bigot."

3
me-no-likely2 3 points ago +3 / -0

No offense to pedes named Shaniqua or Daquan, of course

3
Junionthepipeline 3 points ago +3 / -0

Did they show up couse it's mostly james and Beth protesting couse that will make mom and dad mad and ohh look free drugs.

18
nateyboy 18 points ago +18 / -0

angry white women speaking for black people**

14
deleted 14 points ago +14 / -0
6
Icepck 6 points ago +7 / -1

Angry armed people urge you to reconsider your decision to ignore the suit...

180
Seenev 180 points ago +183 / -3

SCOTUS are cowards.

56
deleted 56 points ago +57 / -1
59
deleted 59 points ago +61 / -2
19
ZerroDefex 19 points ago +19 / -0

Like someone earlier saying "Trump called it fake news about him declaring martial law." Well duh, why would he admit ahead of time that he was planning to do it?

4
Dingus 4 points ago +4 / -0

The sky is blue. Or is that just what they want you to think?

5
Awilen 5 points ago +5 / -0

Food for thought.

For centuries in a lot of far-east cultures and languages, blue was just another shade of green.

So was the sky blue or green then?

My point is: words have meaning within a culture, and I reject the meaning of words within cultural Marxism.

1
DarkestMatt 1 point ago +2 / -1

The sun is literally green.

5
mesothelioma 5 points ago +6 / -1

Exactly. People forget that WE GET THE SAME INFORMATION HIS ENEMIES DO! Because of that fact it's easy to get discouraged. We don't get insider info. Just trust that Trump knows more than we do and we don't know the cards he has until he plays them.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
0
deleted 0 points ago +2 / -2
3
ZerroDefex 3 points ago +4 / -1

Ones that McConnell would allow to be approved.

1
deleted 1 point ago +2 / -1
100
Oneyes 100 points ago +102 / -2

Anything after Biden is installed will be useless.

11
Bioxoho 11 points ago +11 / -0

That is why we have to stop him at all cost on january 6th

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
1
the-new-style 1 point ago +15 / -14

Nope. It can be ruled invalid.

31
politicsaside 31 points ago +33 / -2

In theory, but once he’s inaugurated the only constitutional way to remove a sitting President is impeachment. And we can’t count on demoncrat house and senate members to do the right thing.

20
Gentlemancharmander 20 points ago +23 / -3

Well... I can think of at least one other way to remove a sitting president...

16
politicsaside 16 points ago +17 / -1

In Minecraft.

5
TripleBlack 5 points ago +5 / -0

I like to fill tunnels under buildings with TNT, Guy Fawkes style.

In Minecraft. Of course.

4
BloodyWolf 4 points ago +4 / -0

... It could be made to look natural, given his state of health... XD

3
sociopathix 3 points ago +3 / -0

We can get Commiela if we need to know every possibility. She's already gamed it all out.

3
PleistoceneBeasts 3 points ago +3 / -0

massive protests that lead to stepping down and calling for a new election

-6
deleted -6 points ago +2 / -8
5
Gentlemancharmander 5 points ago +5 / -0

Fuck off commie

-4
deleted -4 points ago +1 / -5
1
AnonByTheLake 1 point ago +1 / -0

Why, Nixon showed the way, he resigns.

-5
deleted -5 points ago +1 / -6
3
russianbot4673 3 points ago +3 / -0

IF they impeached him it would still just go to kamala

3
politicsaside 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yup. Inauguration is not an option.

1
David 1 point ago +1 / -0

And why not?

2
politicsaside 2 points ago +2 / -0

Because they’re evil traitor commies.

3
ProphetOfKek 3 points ago +4 / -1

Could but won’t. Courts are not on our side. They’ve already decided, they use what they want to justify.

2
Dingus 2 points ago +2 / -0

Good luck with your theory.

2
uooobeato 2 points ago +2 / -0

Which is never gonna happen.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
TenScoops 1 point ago +2 / -1

look at the bright side, free Chinese language lessons

80
deleted 80 points ago +82 / -2
47
Rinorooter 47 points ago +47 / -0

He should have stood up to Roberts.

26
deleted 26 points ago +26 / -0
33
deleted 33 points ago +39 / -6
9
what_the_shet 9 points ago +12 / -3

This is not a proven LARP. It could have easily been a phone call overheard, and it could also have been possible for it to actually have been heard from an in person meeting.

We don't know, so let's not claim we do.

6
russianbot4673 6 points ago +11 / -5

it's almost 99.9% a larp.

for one thing, it's beyond obvious to anyone with a double digit IQ that tons of misinfo AKA rumors have been going around since election night. people on facebook, here, 4chan, and everywhere else have been driven to mad speculation and outright spreading fake bullshit for kicks. how much shit that we heard about 'through the grapevine' turned out to not be true? only a complete dum dum isn't supremely skeptical of anything coming out like that, at this point. and the key is that roberts is an easy and obvious target. conservatives hate the guy, he was appointed by a republican but sides with libs often, and he's chief justice. if you wanted to make up some juicy nugget and watch it spread like wildfire, he's one of the top figures you'd consider doing that with.

also nothing about the accusation makes sense. how the fuck does a justice demand that other justices vote as they're told? fucking come on. man.

1
DongSquad420 1 point ago +1 / -0

Most of the shit lin wood posts at this point comes off as a massive larp. Just sayin, he's been talking a big game with no receipts

-1
deleted -1 points ago +1 / -2
2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
shaven_llama 2 points ago +2 / -0

And someone how I doubt a collection of 50+ year old legal professionals would allow themselves to be intimidated by an old pedo throwing a tantrum.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
2
Rinorooter 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yes, Alito. And yes I'm going off the 3rd hand info about 1 screaming match.

8
Meseems 8 points ago +8 / -0

Yeah, I feel we are in limbo now, nothing is happening, there is nothing going on, only waiting for Jan. 6th... This sucks.

6
shaven_llama 6 points ago +6 / -0

Gut still says this situation is coming to a head before Jan 6th. Or else those tacos I ate were bad.

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
3
ippwndu 3 points ago +3 / -0

1/6 is a victory celebration.

4
deleted 4 points ago +5 / -1
-4
deleted -4 points ago +2 / -6
4
deleted 4 points ago +6 / -2
1
BloodyWolf 1 point ago +1 / -0

If he chose to arm his supporters or take some form of military action, a rally would be a great cover for it. It gets a large number of loyal and motivated people right next to you. Otherwise, DC is overwhelmingly Democrat. But I don't know if Trump is capable of this. It might just be him naively trying to pressure the establishment. That is not enough.

0
Meseems 0 points ago +2 / -2

I don't think Trump will invoke Martial Law of Insurrection Act if nearly every Republican is happy to have Biden (business as usual). Trump will be deemed a dictator and will be targeted for assassination.

Nobody around him will support him, only a handful of senators are MAGA people. Do you think Jared Kusher is supporting Trump? Ivanka? Even his family is probably telling him: "Don't do it Dad, let's just go back to normal".

Can't blame the guy.

Mitch McConnell, Graham fist-bumping Kamala Harris, most of the senate, the AZ republican legislature, the GA republican legislature, the WI republican legislature, even the people Trump endorsed, are now happy that Biden will bring back the "business as usual" swamp.

Sorry to say, but it's over... unless a miracle or a bomb-shell is released before Jan 6th, that's what I'm hopeful for.

But don't Martial Law or Insurrection Act won't happen, Trump and his family don't want to be poisoned or sniped by a CIA deep state operative.

2
PoleHERbehr 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm out of the loop, why does everyone hate Kusher?

2
Meseems 2 points ago +2 / -0

Not hating him, he is nice, too nice.

That's why he can negotiate peace, but he cannot negotiate war.

He and Ivanka are probably telling daddy to not use the military or insurrection act, we know he listens to them. That's why Trump is not going to use Martial Law or Insurrection Act.

That, and he doesn't want he and his family to be "removed" from office by CIA deep state assassins lol.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
-13
Anaconda -13 points ago +13 / -26

Alito sucks ass. So does Thomas. Their reputations are forever tarnished when instead of actually dissenting they agreed with thr other 7 justices to "NOT GRANT ANY RELIEF WHATSOEVER" on 12/11

8
ProphetOfKek 8 points ago +8 / -0

Pretty sure that was injunctive relief.

2
Goozmania 2 points ago +2 / -0

No, he is right. They agreed to hear the case but said they would offer no relief, even if they agreed with the case. Their dissent was meaningless lip service.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
ButAtLeastWeDontHave 1 point ago +1 / -0

We keep Anaconda around so that he doesn't make an alt, if he doesn't already have one, and so that we get our healthy daily dose of salt without overdoing it.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
66
PresidentErectHunter 66 points ago +68 / -2

Alito, Thomas, ACB, Gorsich, and Kavanaugh all live in DC and wish to continue attending the elite DC parties.

Gee, I wonder which way they will vote.

22
KickingPugilist 22 points ago +31 / -9

Alito and Thomas ruled in favor of Texas..

30
deleted 30 points ago +37 / -7
27
TrumpsBestFriend 27 points ago +27 / -0

You're almost correct. Alito and Thomas were most likely referring to injunctive relief when they said they wouldn't provide relief. No judge - especially those 2 - are going to say how they would rule without hearing the case.

Remember the request was twofold - hear the case and offer immediate relief by temporarily suspending certification.

16
zooty 16 points ago +16 / -0

They wanted to hear Texas.

4
deleted 4 points ago +7 / -3
2
zooty 2 points ago +2 / -0

Exactly.

1
bingobangobongo69 1 point ago +1 / -0

Because of their belief that hearing cases filed under original jurisdiction is non-discretionary for the Supreme Court.

In other words, if Texas had sued Michigan because they wanted Whitmer to send them feet pics, they would've said the same thing.

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
5
deleted 5 points ago +6 / -1
-31
Anaconda -31 points ago +3 / -34

Fuck Alito and Thomas the most. They tried to LARP like they were on our side on 12/11 but they actually agreed 9-0 to "NOT GRANT ANY RELIEF TO TRUMP" on that dark day

25
rangers24 25 points ago +26 / -1

Not grant immediate relief...the wanted to hear the case and then decide

5
Ownsr 5 points ago +5 / -0

Relief to TEXAS because that is who was filing suit. Trump wasn’t the plaintiff. ( I think it’s BS personally but there it is)

54
weholdthesetruths 54 points ago +55 / -1

Settling this with SCOTUS would be ideal. I don't want to have to invoke the Insurrection Act. I'll go with that if it comes to it but I think it would be better for everyone if SCOTUS just does the right thing.

23
KickingPugilist 23 points ago +23 / -0

This would only directly affect PA. Even if it gets flipped back to Trump, is there time for the other cases to get through to get us to 270?

28
fishyPussy 28 points ago +30 / -2

If PA flips, all other do because of the same unconstitutional changes by their governors and SOS. But I doubt scotus has balls.

13
hlecter 13 points ago +13 / -0

Only if they're more scared of Trump than the swamp will they get the balls.

8
FrankieDs 8 points ago +8 / -0

Yep. We need to put more fear into them

3
bingobangobongo69 3 points ago +3 / -0

That's not how anything works, each claim needs to be judged separately. SCOTUS precedent would help for sure, but a favorable outcome is neither automatic nor guaranteed

2
sociopathix 2 points ago +2 / -0

They better file against them all if they haven't already done so.

6
TrumpsBestFriend 6 points ago +6 / -0

Arizona and Georgia's Republican governors would have an excuse to rescind their seals

2
sociopathix 2 points ago +2 / -0

Brian Limp won't.

5
Junionthepipeline 5 points ago +5 / -0

Like it or not we need to do that and a few other acts and such.at the end of the day the entire swamp needs to be removed weather from business academia goverment of all levles swiftly and with whatever force is required.optics are rapidly becoming inconsequential.then a rapid return to normalcy and with such swift and permanent justice no one dares to try again in a generation.the goverment of china needs to be removed immediately. It wont happen though.

2
yellow_iron 2 points ago +2 / -0

Ironically it would even be better for the establishment, to just ride out another four years and put up another two controlled candidates.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
TheWinningNeverStops 1 point ago +1 / -0

The Insurrection Act will be invoked with or without them. It's going to happen and they will all be rounded up.

48
GamebredPitbull 48 points ago +49 / -1

SCOTUS won't do anything.

-49
Anaconda -49 points ago +7 / -56

Especially the cucks Thomas and Alito

17
deleted 17 points ago +21 / -4
6
lash 6 points ago +6 / -0

snek

7
AmannamedRJ 7 points ago +8 / -1

Wat? Thomas is probably one of the most based people on SCOTUS

1
Goozmania 1 point ago +1 / -0

None of them are 'based.' They are swamprats who have served in government their entire lives.

46
Hardrocker556 46 points ago +51 / -5

Trump is just extending every opportunity he can at this point so its on record that he tried to do it legally and peacefully. Trump will then take his option to the table and hit them with the full force of the government. There are going to be many behind bars after Christmas so as to keep the peace during the holidays. After Christmas and possibly new years...he will crush them like a bug and use the EO from 2018 about interference in elections and take the swamp.down...in the end claiming he kept his promise to drain the swamp...this is his chance to do it and we all know he will take it. For all we know Scotus is in on this...refusing it all so Trump will take the left down.

14
whitecatcafe 14 points ago +15 / -1

This is the way I see it as well. He doesn’t want to take the EO route but they’re forcing him to.

13
deleted 13 points ago +14 / -1
37
bewarethejogger 37 points ago +38 / -1

"Oh sorry there could be a riot so the Constitution doesn't matter."

-SCOTUS

12
yellow_iron 12 points ago +12 / -0

Founding fathers: "Just so we're clear, none of this matters if there is a riot."

9
The_Emperor 9 points ago +9 / -0

...or a pandemic, just so we're clear, right?

1
Minn2000 1 point ago +1 / -0

I think that's what January 6th is meant to be for.

35
deleted 35 points ago +36 / -1
2
TheWinningNeverStops 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yup. Trump just needs to have it on the record. They will hang either way in minecraft. For the previous dismissal.

1
PoleHERbehr 1 point ago +1 / -0

What is with this minecraft reference. Please help me understand it

1
TheWinningNeverStops 1 point ago +2 / -1

Nice try glow harder~

1
PoleHERbehr 1 point ago +1 / -0

Huh?

or it could just be a pede that doesnt get all the internet references b/c I don't love in the internet.

If you're unwilling to help them just disregard my post

2
TheWinningNeverStops 2 points ago +2 / -0

Assuming you aren't a glowie, minecraft is used to mask ill intent to harm someone in real life. It's to disguise threat.

It's to throw off feds. Say you make a statement about hanging a bureaucrat, you put in minecraft at the end so as to make it harmless. Everyone else will get what you mean and even if feds do as well they can't do anything about it.

2
PoleHERbehr 2 points ago +2 / -0

Gotcha, you can remove this more if your wish

12
AmericaFloats 12 points ago +12 / -0

"Trump is crazy, maybe - crazy like a fox..." -- forgot who, but damn if that's not truer every day

1
PEDELICAN 1 point ago +1 / -0

Jones?

2
AmericaFloats 2 points ago +2 / -0

Piers Morgan

-6
deleted -6 points ago +2 / -8
2
FollowTheRabbit 2 points ago +2 / -0

Dude, you sound like a ccp agent thats waiting on biden to win so he can get a promotion. Calm down fang fang.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
randomuser9193 1 point ago +1 / -0

uh no

9
Mooma [S] 9 points ago +11 / -2

I think the strategy is to have a case which will not overturn the entire result, so the court is not scared to take. "It's only one state" then they can bring other states, and also pressure other legislatures to act.

Right no state wants to be first to throw out the fraud certification.

7
Anaconda 7 points ago +14 / -7

Worthless. They won't hear until 1/22.

🤡🌍

6
hlecter 6 points ago +6 / -0

SCOTUS can hear the case if they want to.

11
Junionthepipeline 11 points ago +11 / -0

I doubt they want to.

1
bingobangobongo69 1 point ago +1 / -0

Why did they wait more than a month before appealing these old cases?

And they didn't ask for emergency consideration?

-2
deleted -2 points ago +1 / -3
3
Taupkek 3 points ago +3 / -0

True. OTOH, They could decide not to hear the case because it is "non-determinative" meaning even if they rule in his favor it still doesnt change the outcome of the election. Its kind of a catch-22 situation. Still I'm interested to see if they take it and rule on it before the 6th, when it matters.

8
Nomad1 8 points ago +8 / -0

Denied because it was filed too early or late and there was or was not any injury so you have to file before there is injury or wait until after injury. But then you will not have standing. As a result you'll have to refile and be heard in another court that will then say the other court is the correct court.
ISNT LAWYERING FUN!!! ANYONE CAN DO THIS!!!

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
8
deleted 8 points ago +8 / -0
2
deleted 2 points ago +3 / -1
7
Bedminster 7 points ago +7 / -0

FUCK YOU ROBERTS!

7
pizza_lawyer 7 points ago +7 / -0

1/6/21 sounds like a good day for them to rule on this issue...

6
deleted 6 points ago +8 / -2
2
bingobangobongo69 2 points ago +2 / -0

These are three different cases, the one you're referencing has been sitting on the Supreme Court docket ever since, and could be taken up at any time as they only denied expedited consideration at the time.

The ballots involved in that specific case are not sufficient to overturn the election, so the other cases need to succeed as well.

6
RARA2 6 points ago +6 / -0

It’s a really big deal that this is dealt with. We can’t let states do anything they want at anytime.

3
FORMERCHILDSTAR 3 points ago +3 / -0

It's true. Especially when the violation of state election laws intentionally disadvantages another party.

6
KnoxHarrington 6 points ago +6 / -0

SCOTUS is afraid of the leftist mob when they and the rest of the elite should be worried about the guillotine.

We aren't coming to steal TVs from Target. We're taking the country back from evildoers.

6
sovietcattle 6 points ago +6 / -0

SCOTUS will dismiss. Those judges want nothing to do with this election. They are the deepest of the deep state.

6
freespeech1a 6 points ago +7 / -1

Put SCOTUS on the list of Jan 6 mostly peaceful protests.

5
Ham_Sandwich77 5 points ago +6 / -1

Remember folks, the Supreme Court has already declared that they'll defer to whichever side they fear the most violence from. That's why Trump invited you to Washington on Jan 6th: Not necessarily to commit violence, but as a show of force for a supreme court who's decided to rule by might-makes-right.

5
Supersaiyanbroly737 5 points ago +5 / -0

This time let's ensure that Roberts et al hear us. You know, these justices would rather appease the rioting Dims instead of upholding justice.

Time for a mostly peaceful protest in front of their houses.

5
Cuz99 5 points ago +5 / -0

Denied in 3....2.....1

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
2
Trumpeteer 2 points ago +2 / -0

1776

5
Kramercalled 5 points ago +5 / -0

I've been saying the writing is on the wall in PA since 11/5 or so. Naively believed the system was less corrupt than it has proven to be. Thought we'd flip PA and get the usual riots. Ha! If only

5
0xTC 5 points ago +5 / -0

Hey Supreme Court, you don’t get to change election rules just because of “Covid”. BETTER do your fucking jobs!

4
Afterthought 4 points ago +5 / -1

It helps even to have it still active in the courts on Jan 6th because it strengthens the case to set those electoral votes aside en route to a Contingent Election that same day.

The rally is to protect the Congress from a Leftist revolt when they realize Trump is going to be reelected.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
4
RogueLeaderX 4 points ago +4 / -0

Another case never to be heard! 🙄

4
Latinalover 4 points ago +4 / -0

I can't wait to see a response required date. What a joke. Defund the SCOTUS and appoint judges who actually have a backbone and a give a shit about this country because the current ones have shown they are Cowards.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
4
deleted 4 points ago +5 / -1
4
geocitiesuser 4 points ago +4 / -0

So much fuckery. I don't know what to think anymore. I'm pretty convinced that SCOTUS will do everything in its power to NOT have a final say if any votes count or not. They are hell bent on it.

All of DC is against him, and by definition, us as well. Every blue fortress is every major city is against us. So many normies are blue pilled so hard that they have the gall to look the other way.

This jan 6th protest better be enormous. It needs to be enough people that it is undeniable.

3
onceuponaflagstaff 3 points ago +3 / -0

Weird thing is, that’s an “okay” position to take.

If they would have just came out and said, yea, elections are non-justiciable... then,like.. cool.

But voting right act is out, and also they can’t rule on the census that determines voting either.

Also, in the future, the 30+ red states can do whatever the f they want.

say it

3
PaulRevere123 3 points ago +4 / -1

Can't dodge this one Roberts. No way to claim you are not involved into this. You think BLM riots are scary? Imagine how much worse it will be for you when thousands of AR-15 yielding patriots chant for your head...

3
sustainable_saltmine 3 points ago +3 / -0

And Roberts will have an other tantrum in the next room over this...

3
Pencilneckshiff 3 points ago +3 / -0

It's becoming a joke..we have been cheated by joe and the hoe- period and the world is laughing at this country!

3
Drumpskidoodle 3 points ago +4 / -1

whats the fucking point anymore? our government has betrayed and abandoned us. there's only one way to victory now.

3
slaphappy2 3 points ago +3 / -0

Coney : "Marcia ? Can you find the "No Standing" rubber stamp ? I think it's in my top drawer..."

Goresuch : "No wait, Amy - wouldn't it be more fun to actually pretend to take the case just to fuck around with Trump a bit ? We'll just get the interns to write up some legal bullshit. I'm getting kind of bored..."

Kavanaugh : "How bout a drinking game ? Let's chug some brewskis until we can't stand any more...get it ? No standing ? Damn Amy, bend over so I can see some pantyline..."

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
slaphappy2 1 point ago +1 / -0

It sounds as if you still take seriously the idea that we still have an orderly Constitutional republic functioning with laws and traditions.

That's all gone now. This is fucking Venezuela now. SCOTUS is over - they've shown their cards - if they can't act to deal with a stolen Presidential election - they clearly are signaling their powerlessness.

I'm sure Stalin had a Supreme Court, too.

3
WildRiot 3 points ago +4 / -1

Doesnt look like he can get PA to contest their electors at congress so trying this avenue to get enoigh electoral votes in case they take the second slate

3
FORMERCHILDSTAR 3 points ago +4 / -1

If PA or any state violates it's own laws then the supreme court must provide a remedy. It would be like an umpire ignoring a player all juiced up on PEDs. He'd get thrown out of the ball park. Pennsylvania needs to get thrown out of the ball park!

3
bobobob 3 points ago +3 / -0

This seems pretty clear cut and hopefully SCOTUS will do the right thing this time. Pennsylvania's election results are tainted because they didn't bother to follow their own election laws. Their results cannot be included because they were obtained through unlawful means.

3
Trustheplan 3 points ago +3 / -0

Powell as special counsel and we solve the problem in 2 week

0
deleted 0 points ago +7 / -7
3
deleted 3 points ago +4 / -1
3
Simple_Doot 3 points ago +3 / -0

But she quotes big scary things like "Ima release the Kraken." Both her and Lin have missed the mark repeatedly while making big, dramatic statements online and in interviews. Can't just say big things and then not do big things for long before people catch on to the formula.

2
bubbadubs 2 points ago +3 / -1

Can you point to a single thing in their lawsuits that’s incorrect?

It kinda seems like you’re siding with places like CNN’s coverage of their lawsuits.

Because I haven’t found even a single one of their legal claims to be inaccurate.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
bingobangobongo69 2 points ago +2 / -0

Confusing Michigan counties with Minnesota counties, using provably wrong turnout figures, getting a vehicle mechanic to anonymously sign an affidavit purporting that he's an intelligence expert, using rounding in the Edison data feed as proof of "ranked choice voting".

Aside from bad evidence, their legal arguments are also complete shit, unsurprisingly they've therefore lost in like eight different courts at this point.

3
MrGentleHeart 3 points ago +3 / -0

Sorry no standing, we are afraid of riots - Chickens

1
FreedomFromGovt 1 point ago +1 / -0

Wait'll they see all 100 million of the 'Majority Formerly Known as Silent' start jacking shit up.

2
geebeext 2 points ago +2 / -0

Just to cement how compromised the SC is!

2
KristiNoemFaceFuck 2 points ago +2 / -0

They've proven they don't want to 'decide the election'. Then it's EO time.

2
TheWinningNeverStops 2 points ago +2 / -0

I've lost all hope in those faggots. I'm just gonna prepare myself for the inevitable fight in fact i hope it comes down to that because the bureaucracy needs cleansing.

2
TheDonaldVET1 2 points ago +2 / -0

The only way is military. SCOTUS is BROKEN

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0