Wait .. you mean the sitting POTUS might have a chance at standing in a US presidential election case???
I am sure they are right now looking for an excuse, like too many marriages to foreigners, orange appearance on some TV channels, wrong middle initial, etc.
Can't be denied on standing this time. Don't want to hear any other excuses.
that's where you're wrong, kiddo!
Yep, SCOTUS is compromised.
Standing or no standing, if 7/9ths of SCOTUS dropped the Texas case just because Roberts squealed... Well... Compromised.
I'd like to be wrong though.
what makes you say that it wont be denied because of standing? sorry im not that informed, could you elaborate on that please?
Well seems to me they're suing as an Entity which was harmed.
some silly fools think the constitution is still a valid and relevant legal document
fools
i agree this feels like it might stick
Wait .. you mean the sitting POTUS might have a chance at standing in a US presidential election case???
I am sure they are right now looking for an excuse, like too many marriages to foreigners, orange appearance on some TV channels, wrong middle initial, etc.
They can deny it because it's past the time that electors met. This would also set a precedent, which the Roberts Court is loathe to do.