Pa Supreme court cannot override the US constitution. The legislature is supposed to make election law, not court or Governor. should state supreme court be allowed to infringe upon any other rights? maybe tell black people they can't vote for example?
The power given to the state legislatures to determine the manner of voting is given from the Constitution of the United States. All states agree to abide by federal law as outlined in the founding documents. The power/authority of the legislative branch of PA was usurped by the other two branches. It is definitely within the authority of the SCOTUS to make a ruling.
doesnt matter, the law the legislatures made (mail in voting) in the first place violated the PA constitution. so all branches of the PA gov violated the constitution. probably applies to machine voting too. among other rules, the people have to vote directly to change the constitution-that applies to everything including voting......and because the voting law was changed in a federal election, it involves the SCOTUS.
the constitution is the SUPREME law of the land. it supersedes state laws. if PA is violating the constitution then the supreme court has a duty to fix that shit
im a bit cynical with regards to scotus at this point so i'm not expecting much there... unless we can put more pressure on the corrupt actors than the deep state...
Texas was a slam-dunk but they decided not to do it. And Alito and Thomas said they would have heard it but also would have not given relief based on its merits.
If PA SC says it’s okay to imprison people for homosexuality, you think SCOTUS wouldn’t take the case?
Pa Supreme court cannot override the US constitution. The legislature is supposed to make election law, not court or Governor. should state supreme court be allowed to infringe upon any other rights? maybe tell black people they can't vote for example?
would be more like white people can't vote.
we (trump voters)are 4/5ths of a person according to a machine. the SCOTUS thru their incompetence supports this.
The power given to the state legislatures to determine the manner of voting is given from the Constitution of the United States. All states agree to abide by federal law as outlined in the founding documents. The power/authority of the legislative branch of PA was usurped by the other two branches. It is definitely within the authority of the SCOTUS to make a ruling.
doesnt matter, the law the legislatures made (mail in voting) in the first place violated the PA constitution. so all branches of the PA gov violated the constitution. probably applies to machine voting too. among other rules, the people have to vote directly to change the constitution-that applies to everything including voting......and because the voting law was changed in a federal election, it involves the SCOTUS.
Kinda like CA ignores the 2nd Amendment? CA has passed laws that clearly violate 2A. Pretty much telling everyone to fuck off. No consequences.
the constitution is the SUPREME law of the land. it supersedes state laws. if PA is violating the constitution then the supreme court has a duty to fix that shit
im a bit cynical with regards to scotus at this point so i'm not expecting much there... unless we can put more pressure on the corrupt actors than the deep state...
SCOTUS doesn't have to do anything.
Texas was a slam-dunk but they decided not to do it. And Alito and Thomas said they would have heard it but also would have not given relief based on its merits.
Don't expect SCOTUS to do a thing.
Stealing an election kind of does away with the whole constitution argument. Not a valid line of reasoning