after hans v liousianna (state immune to federal suits file by their own citizens-such immunity is not in constitution) , plessy v fergusson (separate but equal), buck v bell (legalized forced sterilization upon those the state deemed imbeciles [Trust me, the dems would do it to capitalist before we would marxist]), stump v sparkman (qualified immunity given to judge who ordered teen steryized), Bradley v. Fisher (giving judges absolute immunity), nixon v fitzgerald (qualified immunity), Imbler v. Pachtman (granting absolute immunity to prosecutors), sosamon v texas (gives sovereign immunity to states in federal rluipa claims), roe v wade (legalized killing unborn babies), obergfell v hodges (ruled gay marraiges const right), etc (trans rights), etc...This is what makes ppl decide to burn the scotus down as they been ripping away your every const right by giving immunity to all government officials who seek it for their lawless actions?
after hans v liousianna (state immune to federal suits file by their own citizens-such immunity is not in constitution) , plessy v fergusson (separate but equal), buck v bell (legalized forced sterilization upon those the state deemed imbeciles [Trust me, the dems would do it to capitalist before we would marxist]), stump v sparkman (qualified immunity given to judge who ordered teen steryized), Bradley v. Fisher (giving judges absolute immunity), nixon v fitzgerald (qualified immunity), Imbler v. Pachtman (granting absolute immunity to prosecutors), sosamon v texas (gives sovereign immunity to states in federal rluipa claims), roe v wade (legalized killing unborn babies), obergfell v hodges (ruled gay marraiges const right), etc (trans rights), etc...This is what makes ppl decide to burn the scotus down as they been ripping away your every const right by giving immunity to all government officials who seek it for their lawless actions?
legally I can't encourage such activities. But I can't say I disagree with such responses; it's been a long time coming.