There is the possibility that the code is so poorly written that the logs expose sensitive information, which is a massive “no-no” in secure software. Take for example a user logs into the system, the authentication service writes to the logs that the user successfully logged in and logs their username and password in plain text.
It’s a very common infosec leak to log sensitive info, but asserting that could be “source code” is asinine. Even if it printed the function call with all its context (which is laughably stupid unless they left debug log level on or something) that still isn’t “source code”.
Programmer here.
Logs are not source code.
MI SOS is a fucking faggot and idiot. He's either dumb or he's in on the steal.
Don't be like the MI SOS.
In on the steal. 100%
Her preferred pronoun is 'she'
My 6 year old knows the difference between logs and source code. Not even fucking joking a little bit.
Obv a bullshit excuse.
There is the possibility that the code is so poorly written that the logs expose sensitive information, which is a massive “no-no” in secure software. Take for example a user logs into the system, the authentication service writes to the logs that the user successfully logged in and logs their username and password in plain text.
It’s a very common infosec leak to log sensitive info, but asserting that could be “source code” is asinine. Even if it printed the function call with all its context (which is laughably stupid unless they left debug log level on or something) that still isn’t “source code”.
I think it's safe to assume he's in on the steal and should be treated as such...
With rope?