3095
Comments (106)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
65
Keln 65 points ago +66 / -1

It already says in the article. The homeowner is not charged with anything, and the two criminals that survived get to share two FIRST degree murder charges due to a brilliant law in Louisiana that considers the death of their accomplices in an armed, violent crime to be murder charges for those who live.

I love that. If armed robbers break into your home and you nail some of them, the others get 1st degree murder. Genius!

19
deleted 19 points ago +22 / -3
35
MHCIII 35 points ago +35 / -0

I think those laws stem from the "I was only the driver" defense. Makes sense.

17
MAGA_Flocka_Flame 17 points ago +17 / -0

When you say it like that, you got a point

-9
Buss -9 points ago +3 / -12

It would make sense to hold the driver responsible for innocent bystanders getting killed, but I think holding him responsible for the death of other accomplices is a little much.

8
vegeta_ban 8 points ago +8 / -0

FAFO

5
MHCIII 5 points ago +5 / -0

You're missing the point. It is to prevent every criminal from using that defense

2
Ganath 2 points ago +2 / -0

All deaths during the commission of a crime should fall 100% on any surviving criminal that was involved. If it wasn’t for their actions those deaths wouldn’t have happened, so it is completely their fault. And manslaughter doesn’t apply as the actions that precipitated the deaths, if criminal, were voluntary and premeditated. I don’t see the problem.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
11
iggywon 11 points ago +11 / -0
7
Maga2020Maga2020 7 points ago +7 / -0

The DA in GA choose not to prosecute the 3 men involved in the 'jogger' shooting, then a new DA charged them.

Its never over until a trial happens and are not found guilty, then you can still end up in civil court.

Its a nightmare, our justice system is a mess.