908
Comments (87)
sorted by:
47
FreedomFromGovt 47 points ago +47 / -0

No peace. No surrender. Make the left fucking surrender. For once.

29
deleted 29 points ago +29 / -0
8
deleted 8 points ago +8 / -0
6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
8
Enlivenus [S] 8 points ago +9 / -1

I agree!

21
centex 21 points ago +21 / -0

If they are still trying to hash out a concede or proceed decision, we are fucked.

20
deleted 20 points ago +20 / -0
3
centex 3 points ago +3 / -0

Maybe. My reply was in regard to OP. Meaning, there is no reason to worry, if OP position was correct, it would be a forgone conclusion that we are fucked in that scenario. No reason to worry about anything anymore. Fucked as fucked could be. The only hopeful scenario is that OP is wrong and just reading superficial tea leaves. We are at the precipice of Trump either having solid contingencies for all this far in advance, or Biden. The idea that there is some internal struggle to decide what to do at this late stage is a death knell. So, it MUST be fake news. There is no other hope for the republic if they are still as discombobulated as they appear, trying to cobble a strategy together at the last minute.

1
IronMaiden 1 point ago +1 / -0

If there WAS a plan, we would have absolutely no idea about it until it happens. That's why I'm not going to doom until it's over.

1
centex 1 point ago +1 / -0

You are restating my point. It is political Schrodinger's cat. We are both saved if Trump is playing political theater with the normies, all the dumb hires were, strategic, and he's got receipts ready for mass arrests - and not saved if they are still trying to figure out how to win on the fly at the final hour. We won't know until we open the box.

6
Pumpitrealgood 6 points ago +6 / -0

It is because half of his staff are traitors, Some of them left already, but there are still many in there pushing Trump to concede, he does not want to, but he just does not have enough good people around him to make decisions. Its a travesty. He should have seized the machines long ago before they could be messed with,

2
Enlivenus [S] 2 points ago +3 / -1

I agree.

1
centex 1 point ago +1 / -0

He hired them. Most were obvious traitors. The only reason to have hired many would have been a sting / use them unwitting. Instead we are now saying they are his downfall?

1
Pumpitrealgood 1 point ago +1 / -0

he did hire complete idiots like Chris Christie!?!?!? among others I think the entire sting narrative is BS to keep people inactive. If this was a sting it would have been done a long time ago. It would be over. You would not have sidney powell in the oval office arguing with people. You would not have Peter Navarro writing reports. This sting bullshit has to stop.

6
Enlivenus [S] 6 points ago +8 / -2

I agree. I thought he had a firm plan. I hope he does. Fight!

19
MadeinUSAquality1 19 points ago +20 / -1

On The War Room there was talk with Rudy that Sidney could be appointed by Trump to lead a special counsel on election fraud. She already had most of the evidence. If true I hope the first subpoena is Gov Kemp.

10
StaryHickory 10 points ago +12 / -2

Little fucking late.

9
Enlivenus [S] 9 points ago +10 / -1

She will be a great Special Prosecutor!

4
IlIlIlIlIl 4 points ago +4 / -0

Full subpoena power to present cases before rigged courts including rigged SCOTUS. It would prove that the Insurrection Act is beyond justified.

1
Enlivenus [S] 1 point ago +2 / -1

She would be great!

15
Ghostphaez 15 points ago +16 / -1

You guys have to stop spreading BS. The Martial law thing is fake news, as GEOTUS himself told us:

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1340523944680583169

Also confirmed by former Overstock CEO Patrick Byrne, who was at the meeting:

In addition, any suggestion if there was talk of a military coup or martial law is also a flat lie. 100% false. I was there for 4 1/2 hours, I heard the entire conversation, that is a 100% fabrication.

https://twitter.com/PatrickByrne/status/1340747321294909444

8
deleted 8 points ago +8 / -0
3
Enlivenus [S] 3 points ago +4 / -1

I am an advocate of Trump using the Insurrection Act. Martial Law may not even be necessary.

2
Ghostphaez 2 points ago +2 / -0

I tend to doubt that he's going to invoke any emergency powers. The government, with a few notable exceptions, have turned against him. They simply won't cooperate with anything like that. Too many Commies, too many RINOs. GEOTUS is just one man and didn't put enough effort into hiring loyalists to protect him.

I've been saying since the MSM called the race for Biden, we can't rely on Congress, the courts, or the military to fix this. The steal will only be stopped by a massive protest movement led by Trump supporters. We, the people, have to take our country back - our government is corrupt to the core.

1
Enlivenus [S] 1 point ago +2 / -1

I think Trump has four remaining avenues to success and Martial Law will be the fourth and final option if the other three fail.

3
cupocovfefe 3 points ago +3 / -0

What are #123?

I assume:

  1. Wrong (Biden) electors are rescinded by states, thus Trump electors are the only ones considered. Trump wins.
  2. Dueling electors are considered by Pence, Pence picks Trump electors? Trump wins.
  3. Pence doesn't consider contested electors at all, neither candidate gets to 270 via normal route, states go to 1 vote per state? Trump wins.
4
Enlivenus [S] 4 points ago +11 / -7

Powell and Flynn have publicly and repeatedly advocated an aggressive fight and Martial Law. Now Trump dumped everyone from the Friday meeting and met with Powell alone tonight. Use your brain. Think. What does that likely mean? Did he invited her back to meet in private just to tell her that he doesn't like her and Gen Flynn's plan? Maybe you'd rather wait until Fox News tells you what Trump is thinking?

-2
Ghostphaez -2 points ago +10 / -12

So, everyone - including GEOTUS - is lying and you, anonymous forum poster, know the TRUTH?! GTFOH!

Powell is there tonight likely because he is considering her for special counsel on election fraud, not because of any BS martial law plan. You don't know who else was in the meeting tonight, so stop LARPing.

I don't watch Fox, btw, you fucking idiot.

6
Enlivenus [S] 6 points ago +12 / -6

Try to stay with the facts. Weak minds struggling with logic resort to insults. Better to remain silent and be thought the fool than open your mouth and remove all doubt. Where in the post did I say Trump and Powell were planning Martial Law tonight? I said Trump invited her back alone because he must like what she is saying. White House reporters published that she was the only notable person seen leaving the White House tonight. Now, you are free to use your brain, but don't hurt yourself.

4
Ghostphaez 4 points ago +7 / -3

Where in the post did I say Trump and Powell were planning Martial Law tonight?

In the title of your OP, you halfwit!

2
Enlivenus [S] 2 points ago +7 / -5

Now, I don't want to strain your brain, but... The title of the post is... "READ THE SIGNS" (implying you should read the signs and draw your own conclusions). I appologize, I assumed you could read. My bad. Now, holster that toxic tongue and cease with the friendly fire. Point your energy and acrimony toward the enemy.

2
50red 2 points ago +4 / -2

How do you know that "White House attorneys advocated concession?" Anonymous sources from CNN?

-1
Enlivenus [S] -1 points ago +2 / -3

Wow. Why the negativity? The source that said that the three attorneys and Mark Meadows advocated concession was Overstock CEO, Patrick Byrne, who was an attendee in the White House meeting. Links to the full article have been posted several times in this thread.

2
deleted 2 points ago +3 / -1
3
Ghostphaez 3 points ago +3 / -0

GEOTUS said it didn't happen and I take his word on it.

-1
Enlivenus [S] -1 points ago +1 / -2

And then... Trump called Powell to a private meeting at the White House tonight which ended at 9pm. Consequently, my conclusion was Trump "must have liked what she was saying." You are free to assume he called her back because he didn't like what she was saying, but that seems less plausible.

2
MyPresidentOrange 2 points ago +3 / -1

OP you’re retarded. You’re literally attempting to read trumps mind then you claim to only state facts. Flynn stated no discussion of martial law occurred. Patrick Byrne stated no discussion of martial law occurred. Also how did your retarded brain conceive the hallucination that trump “dumped” everyone from the meeting and then only invited Powell back? Also Powell stated she didn’t even meet with trump tonight.

0
Enlivenus [S] 0 points ago +2 / -2

Ben Franklin said, "never argue with an idiot because he will be arguing with one too." So, I'll wrap up this dialog here. Each of your objections have already been answered in my previous responses to you. You have provided no new information in your most recent response. Rather, your response is just another inflamatory reguration of the same vitriol. Ergo, I'm going to have to put you in the corner with a pointy hat. [Block]

4
Klown_Schwab 4 points ago +4 / -0

I think you're right it's probably BS but if Trump was going to cross the Rubicon he wouldn't just come out and say it and give his enemies time to prepare. I guess only time will tell...

1
Ghostphaez 1 point ago +1 / -0

He'd have to give the military time to prepare - I can tell you, as an Army vet, that the military goes on alert well before deployments are officially announced. With all the traitors that surround Trump in his inner circle and among top military brass, it would have leaked out by now if something was happening.

1
Klown_Schwab 1 point ago +1 / -0

That too I figured there's too many satan worshipping pedophiles in the top brass for Trump to consider it

-1
Enlivenus [S] -1 points ago +1 / -2

This post does not state that Trump is declaring Martial Law. It says that signs suggest he likes Powell's position.

0
Enlivenus [S] 0 points ago +1 / -1

What is BS? White House reporters published Powell met with Trump tonight and the meeting ended a few minutes before 9am. When the reporter asked her what they discussed, she said, "none of your business." We all know what is Powell's publicly stated position. Reporters stated no other notable personalities were at the White House. You are free to do as the post says... READ THE SIGNS, and draw your own conclusions.

1
Klown_Schwab 1 point ago +1 / -0

read what u/Ghostphaez replied to me

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
Enlivenus [S] 1 point ago +2 / -1

Trump also said, "everything is on the table". No one knows what Trump will do. Remember, Trump boasts that he does not telegraph his intentions to the enemy. All we can do is READ THE SIGNS by monitoring the facts and then make our own conclusions or wait for the media to tell us.

9
BobGalt 9 points ago +9 / -0

She would make an awesome attorney general when this is all done.

8
Swifty2727 8 points ago +8 / -0

So correct me if I’m wrong... but if I’m reading signs from this I see his WH aides are pushing him to concede and Powell is pressing him to fight on. That would suggest to me there is no ‘Grand Plan’ or trap set, or DNI info Trump team knows they been waiting to spring.....unless Trump is keeping it all to himself .....hope that’s not the case

Personally I think he has info but regardless if he doesn’t we fight to the death.....

3
Enlivenus [S] 3 points ago +4 / -1

I see your logic. I don't know how Trump filters input from subordinates. Does he listen to everyone and then choose their best idea or does he arrive at his own decision and then tests it by listening to his subordinates. The former would suggest that Trump doesn't yet have a plan; but, the latter would suggest that Trump already has a plan and is testing it against the input from his subordinates. We'll soon find out.

4
Swifty2727 4 points ago +4 / -0

My thought... or hope... is Trump is testing everyone ......letting them all have just enough ripe to hang themselves.

1
Enlivenus [S] 1 point ago +2 / -1

I hope that too. I hope he trusts he has 75-100 million America adults behind him. I hope he doesn't trust the politicians.

5
CyrusKingOfAnshan 5 points ago +6 / -1

didn't Trump say Martial Law was fake news?

Also, wasn't there a statement about how that there was argument about Martial Law or Military Coup was also nonsense?

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
3
Enlivenus [S] 3 points ago +4 / -1

I think the Insurrection Act is a better alternative too!

1
jpower 1 point ago +2 / -1

No idea what really went on. Think smoke and mirrors.

Trump says martial law was fake news, but what did he really mean by that. After all, maybe what CNN was reporting on it was the fake news.

Not saying Martial Law is what's happening, but I think we know nothing

1
CyrusKingOfAnshan 1 point ago +1 / -0

yes but this post is purporting to know things and advancing the 'arguments about martial law' FUD.

1
50red 1 point ago +1 / -0

Usually when he calls something "fake news" it doesn't happen.

0
Enlivenus [S] 0 points ago +1 / -1

If you doubt Powell was at the White House tonight, I can appreciate that objection because everything published by the media is suspect. But, we do you know Powell's publicly stated position. That is clear. So, I would suggest keeping an eye peeled for any growing Trump/Powell alliance.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
2
CyrusKingOfAnshan 2 points ago +2 / -0

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1340523944680583169

"Martial law = Fake News. Just more knowingly bad reporting!"

..for real?

0
Enlivenus [S] 0 points ago +1 / -1

First, this post says Trump must like what Powell is advocating (and we all know her publicly stated position). It does not say Trump is declaring Martial Law nor does it say that tonight they discussed Martial Law. It simply says according to a report, they met alone tonight, and you can read the signs as you like. Second, Trump stated he had not discussed Martial Law on Friday. Does that mean he didn't or couldn't discuss it subsequently? Moreover, Trump boasts that he doesn't telegraph his plans to the enemy. He likes to take the enemy by surprise. So, I don't think Trump will telegraph his plans this time. It's worth thinking about.

1
Enlivenus [S] 1 point ago +2 / -1

The only qoute currently published was CNN reporter who said he asked Powell (when leaving the White House tonight at 9pm), "what did you and the President talk about?" Reporter said her reply was, "none of your business." Any media reports must be construed with skepticism. Choose to trust what you want.

0
Enlivenus [S] 0 points ago +1 / -1

Yes and yes. And, then... Trump invited Powell back to the White House tonight alone. I sumised, Trump "must like what she had to say". Otherwise, why did he invite her back alone? There is the possibility that they were discussing a possible Special Prosecutor job or the weather. You must READ THE SIGNS and draw your own conclusions because no one knows what they discussed tonight. Also, I would consider whether Trump would telegraph Martial Law if that was his plan. He always boasts that he does not telegraph his plans to the enemy. I guess we'll just have to READ THE SIGNS, until we know for sure. I believe anticipation and preparation is key to success. Consequently, I prefer to READ THE SIGNS the best I can before conflict. To each his own.

5
this_mortal_coil 5 points ago +5 / -0

Could be the Art of War. It could be that Byrne is sent out with a story making him appear weak, like he's at loose ends.

Trump gets the pulse of the people. He can't be completely disconnected like AJ seems to think. He's too over the target too much of the time. It could be that he knows this WH attorneys and they are about.

Perhaps the Powell/Flynn, or some derivation thereof is the real plan. Lin Wood also has the President's ear and look what he has been telegraphing everywhere.

1
Enlivenus [S] 1 point ago +2 / -1

No one knows yet. But, I trust Trump (and Jared Kushner) are pretty cagey. Even though I don't like Jared, I know he has Trump's back.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
0
Enlivenus [S] 0 points ago +1 / -1

I agree. I wonder why Trump would allow the Overstock CEO in on such an important meeting, unless that meeting wasn't as important as we think it was.

1
this_mortal_coil 1 point ago +1 / -0

Or if the information if the meeting was more important than we think and Byrne knows where a lot of bodies are buried. Could go either way.

3
Pumpitrealgood 3 points ago +3 / -0

those POS traitors inside the White House need to be relieved of their post. Unbelievable. Historic land-slide victory and they want him to concede. No way

2
Friend_of_John_Galt 2 points ago +3 / -1

Which white house attorneys were for concession?

5
Enlivenus [S] 5 points ago +6 / -1

Pat Cippollone and two attorneys named Eric and Derek. Mark Meadows also wants Trump to concede. Full article here: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/12/betrayed-within-patrick-byrne-blasts-white-house-staff-attending-election-meeting-president-trump-sydney-powell-gen-flynn/

0
Friend_of_John_Galt 0 points ago +1 / -1

I see Cippollone has been sacked. Good.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
0
Enlivenus [S] 0 points ago +1 / -1

That would be great!

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
GamebredPitbull 1 point ago +1 / -0

Look, I love Sidney for her loyalty to Trump, but I don't know if she's the one to do this job. Her Kraken lawsuit was a clusterfuck and doesn't seem to be getting anywhere in the courts.

Why does it seem like Trump is scrambling? I'm starting to believe they were caught totally off-guard by the steal.

0
Enlivenus [S] 0 points ago +1 / -1

Was Powell's mission to win lawsuits or cause publicity and draw attention to the fraud and energize Trump's base? She was unsuccessful with the former, but very successful with the latter. Unfortunately, I agree with you. I think Trump was overly confident about the election and he was taken by surprise. No one anticipated the magnitude of this fraud!

-5
StaryHickory -5 points ago +4 / -9

Powell has not really accomplished anything so far. And she seems to bite on some strange stuff. I like her, and I support her. But can't see her getting anything done. I can't imagine what she was doing there though.

5
emredlark 5 points ago +6 / -1

I think she’s been doing a lot more than we know about.

4
StaryHickory 4 points ago +4 / -0

I don't blame her in particular. Our judicial system is corrupt. We can see that now. But she latches onto things that she should not from time to time so I think she is one of the worst ones to break new evidence if you ask me.

She might have gotten more info on Dominion since she is being sued (probably). And if so she can do some real damage to Dominion if she has the proper info. This would be encouraging meaning the White House has some more info they have not released.

But at the same time why wait any longer if they did?

0
Enlivenus [S] 0 points ago +1 / -1

She's drawing a lot of attention to the fraud. That's valuable, no?

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
1
StaryHickory 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well I will say she comes off as a little crazy sometimes. Say the CIA flipping votes with SCORECARD and HAMMER. Where is she with the evidence? I don't even doubt she is right. But she says things she seems to not be able to prove from time to time. And it has led us to believe they have more information than perhaps they really have.

So she mixes in claims like that one with legitimate stuff and then people can look at the whole thing and dismiss it as baseless. Despite there being massive evidence of fraud. It's a valid criticism of her.

4
Enlivenus [S] 4 points ago +5 / -1

One can say Powell was unsuccessful in winning lawsuits, while another could say she was VERY successful in drawing attention to the fraud and energizing Trump's army. What was her mission? I don't know yet.

4
StaryHickory 4 points ago +4 / -0

True, I like her and I am glad she is on our side. But man sometimes I think she hurts things with the reposting what seems to be Q-anon larps. Unless.....unless they got some serious evidence. But this is getting silly now. Why wait any longer? Why wait this long?

Not getting a good vibe these days.