117
Comments (44)
sorted by:
7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
shitPostingChamp [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Can you catch me up on who Ali is so I can follow your logic?

1
shitPostingChamp [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

I keep up with shit pretty well but it’s hard to keep track of all the players sometimes lol

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
shitPostingChamp [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Gotcha - and the protest was planned prior to Trump tweeting, and we know that’s what he was talking about?

In that case I think he’s probably calling us to Theory 2 at the start of the day, and will likely bleed into Theory 3 when the results come down.

Thanks for showing me that tweet. 45 or 1776. I like it.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
FuckYouAsWell 1 point ago +1 / -0

A protest on the 6th isn't unusual or surprising though. What better day to plan one? Trump could have easily co opted it, and just ran with the original wording for optics.

I don't particularly believe in one way or the other here, but the pre planning by a third party doesn't really tell us much.

5
Seems_legit83 5 points ago +5 / -0

Remember though— he likes to call rallies protests because it gets around the Covid mandates. He’s done that the past few months.

5
tentigers99 5 points ago +5 / -0

I had thought your "theory 3" was correct when he added, "will be wild" at the end of his post.

Pence will declare the contested states invalid (due to fraud evidence), the election will go to Congress/Senate and each state will cast 1 vote.

The GOP has the majority (and, unless there are deep state operatives in the GOP - which we know there are- that openly choose against POTUS- which I think some will, lol)

And, depending on the RINO's, Trump is POTUS The left pulls their shit, and we're already on scene to counter.

2
shitPostingChamp [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yup. Here’s to hoping it will be so.

-4
deleted -4 points ago +2 / -6
1
tentigers99 1 point ago +1 / -0

Pretty sure the "contested" states that are voted out will de-certify from Bidens 306 in a large way. PA GA MI WI AZ NV and NM....pretty sure negating 3 of those take him below

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
4
shitPostingChamp [S] 4 points ago +4 / -0

Exactly, and he didn’t call it peaceful this time.

Also, it’s pretty much a given that if Trump is elected on Jan 6 the left will immediately seek to incite violence

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
3
JPerkins84 3 points ago +3 / -0

im thinking number 3 and hes wanting the patriots to stand between him and the savages on the left. the police will do nothing to stop the left from committing violence.

1
shitPostingChamp [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Pretty much my line of thinking as well

3
deleted 3 points ago +4 / -1
2
tentigers99 2 points ago +2 / -0

Civil War won't be on the 6th if Trump is the winner, but might be the start of it (1st battle?) - martial law is out, too political and too many limits but, insurrection act may be called while the battle rages in DC on the 6th. Civil war will be the choice of the Patriots/people but probably won't be needed. For optics, the insurrection act will handle that battle in concert with the stipulations in Trump 2018 EO.

The NG/military will get the DC fight under control, deploy elsewhere for what breaks outside DC, then go collect the traitors. Local LEO's will probably co-ordinate w/military/NG. (Maybe not in blue ass DC but, most places afterwards).

Obama wrote two election consequence orders (2015) extremely similar to Trumps EO on foreign election interference (2018). Seizing assets (called "blocking" in the EO's) like fake news and big tech that interfered, etc.

1
shitPostingChamp [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

This works pretty well too

-1
deleted -1 points ago +1 / -2
3
NZbacon 3 points ago +3 / -0

It's a show of force and support.

Both the best thing ever and the most terrifying thing ever depending on which group you're in.

1
shitPostingChamp [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Lol. Well, here’s to being on the winning side, God willing

2
AH1F 2 points ago +2 / -0

3

1
ramennov 1 point ago +1 / -0

the most logical conclusion

Nothing here follows necessarily, mate.

2
shitPostingChamp [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

Not deductive logic - but abductive; ie inference to the best explanation.

1
ramennov 1 point ago +1 / -0

The "best explanation" is flimsy if it requires that the same reason for things happening in the past is the same reason for them happening in the future. There could be multiple, different reasons for Trump to label a gathering a "protest".

1
rooftoptendie 1 point ago +2 / -1

YOU CLEVER SON OF A BITCH!! This is brilliant.

2
shitPostingChamp [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

Let’s hope it’s true :)

1
Legiapede 1 point ago +1 / -0

He used the word “protest” to sidestep Covid bs.

1
Seal_Pen 1 point ago +1 / -0

Theory 2 makes more sense to me, and I don't glow in the dark either

1
shitPostingChamp [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

It’s certainly not implausible

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
CindyT 1 point ago +1 / -0

Protest the Democrat ELECTORS

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
1
shitPostingChamp [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

This is certainly true

2
shitPostingChamp [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

If it wasn’t for the RINOs Trump would have totally defeated the globalists and done everything we could have possibly wanted within one term

-1
deleted -1 points ago +1 / -2
2
shitPostingChamp [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

Well personally, I’m on team “show up armed if you have the proper planning and fortitude to do so, and under no circumstances bring children” but hey, lol

2
tentigers99 2 points ago +2 / -0

Be careful. I'm sure they'll be looking for that (DC cops). Also, check the laws in states NEAR DC (MD,VA etc) so they don't get you enroute on local gun laws. Guns in the trunk until needed. Stay safe, stay careful, realize they're looking for weapons to slow our roll.

1
shitPostingChamp [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Caution and proper planning are key

-1
gipes -1 points ago +2 / -3

agreed.