Yes, but to be fair, at that time concluded cases were at a 20% death rate and growing. If that apparent rate continued we were on course for something like an 80% fatality rate by May. Purely on the numbers available by worldometer. People were dying from a virus we had primitive understanding of so i get why we were in an apparently dire situation. Now the concluded fatality rate sits at around 3% we are in a very different situation.
Bs .. sars was scary but 10 % death rate of infected and a lot of young ... look up Yvonne mock who essentially killed her entire family by being infected in HK and travelling back to Singapore, but hardly any deaths In total, I was in Hong Kong for that; mers was more scary, I was in Saudi Arabia for that 40%, not many deaths, ebola worse etc etc ... this complete political bull shit going around the world for a political reason not a health reason
Upon close-out review for the preceding 12 months, globally, the IFR is not discernably different than a seasonal flu. The initial ramp-up was absolutely textbook for any new virus like the C-19, and was expected to take the trajectory it did. Real medical professional knew this, and told us this from the beginning.
But, for some insane fucking reason, people starting listening to government bureaucrats and media bobbleheads who wouldn't know the difference between the harbinger of a mass-casualty pandemic and mug of warm bovine fudge.
There's another word for conspiracy, collusion. People make and rely on theories all the time so if you just keep asking have you tested that or do you know it for a fact you sort of destroy them. There's another term for conspiracy theory. Suspicion. Accusing someone of being motivated by racism is the most common malicious conspiracy theory around.
Most of these things both are and aren't invented. Rather, often reinvented to suit new purposes.
Racist was usurped or rather corrupted and the meaning twisted. Leftists corrupt anything they can get their hands on.
Racist was originally racialist. The problem with racialists is that they would racialise things. What do that mean? To make things about race that shouldn't be.
When is the term racist now used? By people making things about race that shouldn't be,
Evil isn't really that creative. When it can it will twist existing things around instead.
Saying that, as to the origin of the contraction from racialist to racist I have no idea how that came about.
This creates a strange effect. To say racists aren't racist is true. To say racists are racist is true. It's valid to say you have to be racist to not be racist.
This is achieved simply flipping between archaic and modern meanings of the word.
I'm saying that the word racist has also become its own antonym. Sort of like how colour can mean white or black. If you make white also mean black then it can become instead a synonym for colour instead. It becomes less specific, drifts.
In that example it makes sense but not where when used it is only one or the other. The meaning may depend on who is saying it and when. You need a great deal of context sometimes to know which it is the word refers to.
It's like instead of having year and no having one word for both then having to determine if it's yes or no by the rest of the sentence. Short sentences may not sufficiently betray the meaning and maintain ambiguity.
This is what happens when the word is used for anything someone doesn't like. It stops mattering if something is actually racist or not. In fact it may be you that is racist to call it racist.
The problem with language is that the meaning of a word depends on a combination of its prevalent use and interpreted meaning. When a word is commonly abused then it takes on these very strange natures.
You can no longer deliberate about what is or isn't racist. The meaning of racist is something that is called racist so if you call it racist then it is. It is natural that as a word is over used and abused it will wear out so to become completely and utterly useless.
Any use is legitimate when no one stands up against its misuse. A valid example of a valid use is: David is racist because David treats everyone equally. There's really no illegitimate use so long as it's used appropriately as an adjective or a noun. It's actually quite like an expletive. It might as well be a word that is an adjective or noun for the sake of being that type of word and nothing else other than perhaps betraying that it's something you don't like but that's not even necessary. You can use it simply because you can.
It's like everything the left touches, turns to ash, you can't have nice things, not even words.
These days I just punch people in the face instead if I disagree with them.
Most people would agree that "islamophobic" is a made up word for instance, as there is no such thing as having a mental illness because you hate or are afraid of Islam.
I see what you are saying, but we should not accept the Marxist words in our vocabulary.
Islamophobia is just a linguistic convention which is valid exclusively within the domain of language as a theoretical discipline. The fault emerges when applied. If someone actually has an irrational fear of Islam such as if I say Islam sucks they faint or break into a desperate panic compelled to escape as though you were trying to poke them with a hot iron just because you used the word Islam then that would be a proper application of the suffix phobia prefixed with Islam matching the convention for debilitating conditions involving excessive fear or aversion to a thing.
All words are made up. That doesn't mean you're incorrect, just your simple approach in dismissing something which should be dismissed.
Adding phobia to the end of something often implies an official medical condition, a psychopathology though there are many other connotations as well. Something to be cured or that is incorrect.
Language is applies opinion and it becomes matter of fact. If you actually look at what they use Islamphobia to describe then it's any opposition to Islam be it good or bad. The fake condition was arrived upon from leftist preachers collaborating with Islamic preachers.
Islamophobia is a common abuse of language.
Someone uses rape to refer to for example I'm walking down the street and goddamn I see a piece of meat swaying back and forth before me buttocks bobbing rhythmically waving at me hypotyising me and beckoning me I can't resist so I pick up my pace until within arms reach then I lurch forward arching my arm around her mouth pulling in tight to both secure her in my clutches and muffle her cries then both lean side ways using both my weight and push off to drag her forcibly into the bushes with physical force and in the same vein I then sexually have my way with her whether she likes it or not penetrating her until my reproductive organs have relieved my self into her then I stranger her so she stays quiet and make my escape.
Now rape refers to that I looked at a woman but I didn't ask her first. Or I asked a woman if I could look at her but didn't ask her if I could ask her if I could ask her if I could look at her first. If people keep staying that's rape when that happens rather than the previous example then there's really nothing I can do about it.
How they use the word is definitive. People on the left have this backwards or backwords funnily enough. They think they determine meaning so if your definition of the same word is the same they think the speaker means what the listener thinks they mean. Putting words in their mouths.
You should ready the 1997 Runnymede Report. Look in the bottom right at the rightthink wrongthink.
You can tell I've spent a lot of time around these people and am used to having to go into excruciating detail. With the left it's not enough. You take every effort.
That's why these days when it comes to people on the left I don't both expending any effort other than smashing their teeth in. Saves a whole lot of effort and trouble. You know what's a lot easier than actually getting to the bottom of things with the left? Caving their skulls in with a brick. That's the simplest most effective means of communication. Tried and tested. Time honoured. Has worked for millions of years and at this point I'm honestly at a loss to explain the evolutionary mechanism for moving beyond it. If their brain is wrong and refuses to be anything else or acknowledge anything else then crush brain, destroy bad brain.
These evil people spill words incessantly. As you can tell I've had to match them but also I care about quality not just quantity. Nothing is enough. Nothing cures them. You cannot beat them. You can only eliminate them. The only thing you can do is put them out of their misery and no longer have to suffer them.
I am a Brit, my family is essentially locked down in the uk, I’m also in Hong Kong and we are locked down here; pretty sure the bogus new strain will show up in the USA to try and lock you down too... pretty sure you will NOT comply...onward and forward.
Oh im well aware this goes beyond britain. The BBC has hold over many Brits and is seen as THE trusted news source by a large amount of uk citizens. Plus its Uk morning so the post was made on the assumption that my yankee doodle brothers and sisters be getting their beauty sleep.
I am already knees deep in it, everyday I erode more of their argument by showing them the evidence. Score so far: Step dad is nearly fully red-pilled as he was already questioning his reality, my aunt is on board of the Covid lie but not yet trump as had TDS to start with, unfortunately we think my mum has the onset of dementia as she can not comprehend any discussions.
Sorry to hear thst, have had dementia in my family i understand what youre going through. The real person still loves you even if they act or say otherwise, dementia is a very cruel thing on everyone affected by it.
Cheers, she is ok now, everyone has said she has lost all the fun outgoing part of her personality and is easily angered but making the most of it now before it gets worse.
"Encourage critical thinking" BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
I actually loled reading that one myself.
Lol "how to bluepill people" basically. Desperate that they are publishing this bollocks
The irony is that the first lockdown was motivated by the conspiracy theory of the chinavirus doing millions of deaths
Yes, but to be fair, at that time concluded cases were at a 20% death rate and growing. If that apparent rate continued we were on course for something like an 80% fatality rate by May. Purely on the numbers available by worldometer. People were dying from a virus we had primitive understanding of so i get why we were in an apparently dire situation. Now the concluded fatality rate sits at around 3% we are in a very different situation.
Bs .. sars was scary but 10 % death rate of infected and a lot of young ... look up Yvonne mock who essentially killed her entire family by being infected in HK and travelling back to Singapore, but hardly any deaths In total, I was in Hong Kong for that; mers was more scary, I was in Saudi Arabia for that 40%, not many deaths, ebola worse etc etc ... this complete political bull shit going around the world for a political reason not a health reason
That's not true, the deathrate is below .2% for my age group it's .0006% that's not an exaggeration.
Im talking worldwide
This where im getting my numbers from: https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/
Upon close-out review for the preceding 12 months, globally, the IFR is not discernably different than a seasonal flu. The initial ramp-up was absolutely textbook for any new virus like the C-19, and was expected to take the trajectory it did. Real medical professional knew this, and told us this from the beginning.
But, for some insane fucking reason, people starting listening to government bureaucrats and media bobbleheads who wouldn't know the difference between the harbinger of a mass-casualty pandemic and mug of warm bovine fudge.
There's another word for conspiracy, collusion. People make and rely on theories all the time so if you just keep asking have you tested that or do you know it for a fact you sort of destroy them. There's another term for conspiracy theory. Suspicion. Accusing someone of being motivated by racism is the most common malicious conspiracy theory around.
The most common and malicious conspiracy is believing that being "racist" is a thing.
The word "racism" was invented by the communists with the specific purpose of conquering Europe.
Most of these things both are and aren't invented. Rather, often reinvented to suit new purposes.
Racist was usurped or rather corrupted and the meaning twisted. Leftists corrupt anything they can get their hands on.
Racist was originally racialist. The problem with racialists is that they would racialise things. What do that mean? To make things about race that shouldn't be.
When is the term racist now used? By people making things about race that shouldn't be,
Evil isn't really that creative. When it can it will twist existing things around instead.
Saying that, as to the origin of the contraction from racialist to racist I have no idea how that came about.
This creates a strange effect. To say racists aren't racist is true. To say racists are racist is true. It's valid to say you have to be racist to not be racist.
This is achieved simply flipping between archaic and modern meanings of the word.
Semantics. Give me an example of a legitimate use, in a sentence, of the word racist or racialist.
I'm saying that the word racist has also become its own antonym. Sort of like how colour can mean white or black. If you make white also mean black then it can become instead a synonym for colour instead. It becomes less specific, drifts.
In that example it makes sense but not where when used it is only one or the other. The meaning may depend on who is saying it and when. You need a great deal of context sometimes to know which it is the word refers to.
It's like instead of having year and no having one word for both then having to determine if it's yes or no by the rest of the sentence. Short sentences may not sufficiently betray the meaning and maintain ambiguity.
This is what happens when the word is used for anything someone doesn't like. It stops mattering if something is actually racist or not. In fact it may be you that is racist to call it racist.
The problem with language is that the meaning of a word depends on a combination of its prevalent use and interpreted meaning. When a word is commonly abused then it takes on these very strange natures.
You can no longer deliberate about what is or isn't racist. The meaning of racist is something that is called racist so if you call it racist then it is. It is natural that as a word is over used and abused it will wear out so to become completely and utterly useless.
Any use is legitimate when no one stands up against its misuse. A valid example of a valid use is: David is racist because David treats everyone equally. There's really no illegitimate use so long as it's used appropriately as an adjective or a noun. It's actually quite like an expletive. It might as well be a word that is an adjective or noun for the sake of being that type of word and nothing else other than perhaps betraying that it's something you don't like but that's not even necessary. You can use it simply because you can.
It's like everything the left touches, turns to ash, you can't have nice things, not even words.
These days I just punch people in the face instead if I disagree with them.
Language is not a matter of opinion.
Most people would agree that "islamophobic" is a made up word for instance, as there is no such thing as having a mental illness because you hate or are afraid of Islam.
I see what you are saying, but we should not accept the Marxist words in our vocabulary.
Islamophobia is just a linguistic convention which is valid exclusively within the domain of language as a theoretical discipline. The fault emerges when applied. If someone actually has an irrational fear of Islam such as if I say Islam sucks they faint or break into a desperate panic compelled to escape as though you were trying to poke them with a hot iron just because you used the word Islam then that would be a proper application of the suffix phobia prefixed with Islam matching the convention for debilitating conditions involving excessive fear or aversion to a thing.
All words are made up. That doesn't mean you're incorrect, just your simple approach in dismissing something which should be dismissed.
Adding phobia to the end of something often implies an official medical condition, a psychopathology though there are many other connotations as well. Something to be cured or that is incorrect.
Language is applies opinion and it becomes matter of fact. If you actually look at what they use Islamphobia to describe then it's any opposition to Islam be it good or bad. The fake condition was arrived upon from leftist preachers collaborating with Islamic preachers.
Islamophobia is a common abuse of language.
Someone uses rape to refer to for example I'm walking down the street and goddamn I see a piece of meat swaying back and forth before me buttocks bobbing rhythmically waving at me hypotyising me and beckoning me I can't resist so I pick up my pace until within arms reach then I lurch forward arching my arm around her mouth pulling in tight to both secure her in my clutches and muffle her cries then both lean side ways using both my weight and push off to drag her forcibly into the bushes with physical force and in the same vein I then sexually have my way with her whether she likes it or not penetrating her until my reproductive organs have relieved my self into her then I stranger her so she stays quiet and make my escape.
Now rape refers to that I looked at a woman but I didn't ask her first. Or I asked a woman if I could look at her but didn't ask her if I could ask her if I could ask her if I could look at her first. If people keep staying that's rape when that happens rather than the previous example then there's really nothing I can do about it.
How they use the word is definitive. People on the left have this backwards or backwords funnily enough. They think they determine meaning so if your definition of the same word is the same they think the speaker means what the listener thinks they mean. Putting words in their mouths.
You should ready the 1997 Runnymede Report. Look in the bottom right at the rightthink wrongthink.
You can tell I've spent a lot of time around these people and am used to having to go into excruciating detail. With the left it's not enough. You take every effort.
That's why these days when it comes to people on the left I don't both expending any effort other than smashing their teeth in. Saves a whole lot of effort and trouble. You know what's a lot easier than actually getting to the bottom of things with the left? Caving their skulls in with a brick. That's the simplest most effective means of communication. Tried and tested. Time honoured. Has worked for millions of years and at this point I'm honestly at a loss to explain the evolutionary mechanism for moving beyond it. If their brain is wrong and refuses to be anything else or acknowledge anything else then crush brain, destroy bad brain.
These evil people spill words incessantly. As you can tell I've had to match them but also I care about quality not just quantity. Nothing is enough. Nothing cures them. You cannot beat them. You can only eliminate them. The only thing you can do is put them out of their misery and no longer have to suffer them.
Yep, the BBC often publishes these "we will tell you how to think and how to talk" articles. Thanks for the post
I am a Brit, my family is essentially locked down in the uk, I’m also in Hong Kong and we are locked down here; pretty sure the bogus new strain will show up in the USA to try and lock you down too... pretty sure you will NOT comply...onward and forward.
Ya know I said to my family before the election "if Biden wins then vaccine before Christmas, if Trump wins 4 years of lockdowns"
Biden "wins" - Vaccine announced same week, to be rolled out before Christmas.
Now Biden's "win" looking a bit shakey - NEW STRAIN, sad part is they still think I'm nuts!
My whole family thinks I’m a complete fruitcake...keep talking the talk and let them keep thinking.
You think it just British ....? This is a global shit show.
Oh im well aware this goes beyond britain. The BBC has hold over many Brits and is seen as THE trusted news source by a large amount of uk citizens. Plus its Uk morning so the post was made on the assumption that my yankee doodle brothers and sisters be getting their beauty sleep.
More of us will read TDW today than that piece of crap from a dying relic. DEFUND THE BBC**************
BBC is a disgusting government-funded propaganda arm, much like NPR in the US
We’re igniting the Biased Broadcasting Commies.
Gen Z are getting based due to all this shit.
I am already knees deep in it, everyday I erode more of their argument by showing them the evidence. Score so far: Step dad is nearly fully red-pilled as he was already questioning his reality, my aunt is on board of the Covid lie but not yet trump as had TDS to start with, unfortunately we think my mum has the onset of dementia as she can not comprehend any discussions.
Sorry to hear thst, have had dementia in my family i understand what youre going through. The real person still loves you even if they act or say otherwise, dementia is a very cruel thing on everyone affected by it.
Cheers, she is ok now, everyone has said she has lost all the fun outgoing part of her personality and is easily angered but making the most of it now before it gets worse.
damn they are getting very very desperate.
TOO
FAR
GONE
Is it a conspiracy that they have a pedo statue over the entrance to BBC headquarters? Nah, that’s legit and easily observable
BBC is "CCP" in British English.
Fuck a bag of all of them.