There were several publications from other sources in the past with minute varying differences. None of these are officially available now. They should've been the same, but that wasn't the case. Hence, the speculation is that the data is fabricated. Lab data shows previously recorded sequences.
If digitally presented data were precise in all officially approved cases, then we would have zero degree of error correction in polls, dead people voting, SSN theft, welfare scams, tax audit, digital vote manipulation, etc.
It's expected for a quickly mutating virus to show slight genomic variations in different sample strains though. If you sequence humans, their DNA wouldn't exactly match either.
You're right about different strains, but that alone shouldn't be the reason for categorizing it under a different label altogether. They even gave a separate name to the illness caused by this virus, as if people never experienced such symptoms before!
There were several publications from other sources in the past with minute varying differences. None of these are officially available now. They should've been the same, but that wasn't the case. Hence, the speculation is that the data is fabricated. Lab data shows previously recorded sequences.
If digitally presented data were precise in all officially approved cases, then we would have zero degree of error correction in polls, dead people voting, SSN theft, welfare scams, tax audit, digital vote manipulation, etc.
It's expected for a quickly mutating virus to show slight genomic variations in different sample strains though. If you sequence humans, their DNA wouldn't exactly match either.
You're right about different strains, but that alone shouldn't be the reason for categorizing it under a different label altogether. They even gave a separate name to the illness caused by this virus, as if people never experienced such symptoms before!