75%+ ? Would you like to elaborate how the other 25%+ is different? While you're at it, please do state the percentage of differences between 2 RNA viruses.
The current virus has already been recorded before. That is the point of this discussion. There is nothing novel about this.
Complete genome sequences of the three novel coronaviruses were submitted to GISAID and have a 86.9% nucleotide sequence identity to a previously published bat SARS-like CoV genome. Since the sequence identity in conserved replicase domains (ORF 1ab) is less than 90% between 2019-nCoV and other members of betacoronavirus, the 2019-nCoV is a novel betacoronavirus belonging to the sarbecovirus subgenus of Coronaviridae family...."elude identification by traditional approaches"
So they called this novel because it is 3.1% short of 90% from a three patient study?? Really? Why did they ignore traditional approaches? Who authorized them to conclude the results from these inaccurate methods?
Phylogenetic analysis of the complete viral genome (29,903 nucleotides) revealed that the virus was most closely related (89.1% nucleotide similarity) to a group of SARS-like coronaviruses (genus Betacoronavirus, subgenus Sarbecovirus) that had previously been found in bats in China5.
So they called this novel because it is 0.8% short of 90% from a one patient study?? Really?
The sequences are almost identical and share 79.6% sequence identity to SARS-CoV. Furthermore, we show that 2019-nCoV is 96% identical at the whole-genome level to a bat coronavirus....However, the amino acid sequences of the seven conserved replicase domains in ORF1ab that were used for CoV species classification were 94.4% identical between 2019-nCoV and SARS-CoV, suggesting that the two viruses belong to the same species, SARSr-CoV.
So they called this novel because it is 10.4% short of 90% from a 7 person study. But, they conclude saying that the replicase were 94.4% identical?
Look at the percentage variations in each of their studies. These are not accurate values, but approximations. You don't isolate and name a virus as novel based on numerous approximations! That's just wrong! The fact that these studies are done in China and the Chinese CDC's involvement should've made you question the authenticity of these tests, but you seem to ignore that!
Are you seriously asking for an official study against big pharma? Are you seriously willing to believe the next strain is covid-21 and so on? This "pay for play" is not going to end! If we ourselves are not skeptical in what these so called sell-out "experts" publish, then how will general population figure out all the corruption going on in the big pharma? Common now!
Big pharma has completely brainwashed our western society into taking OTC drugs as remedy for otherwise functioning natural body reactions!
For eg:
You don't need pills for sleeping, neither do you need pills for headaches!
You don't need pills for common cold or fever, our innate immunity is enough!
You don't need vitamin, mineral, protein, iron, zinc, etc. pills! We get all that from healthy diet and sun light! Lack of any of these is not sickness, but improper diet!
Most of the officially listed syndromes as autistic are normal human behaviors!
Most of the officially listed mental illnesses are normal human behaviors with degenerative lifestyles!
Food allergies in kids? What in the world are we feeding our kids?
Why do you think there is no medicine for cancer till now? Because, there is more perpetual money in other cancer therapies than curing it!
Why do you think cancer is more prevalent in western countries and not in other places? Why are we not told officially that the cancer is mostly caused by diet?
If you still don't understand how the medical and pharmaceutical industries make money, then you should do little more research. I hope you've read the 5000 pages stimulus bill that was written years earlier and has got nothing to do with Covid-19 relief!
Moving on...let me ask you this,
Can you provide an "official" study proving 2020 Election fraud published by any intelligence agencies funded by the Govt. and reported in the news? But, you can find plenty of local and independent studies proving it! Is it not?
Do you want to go little deeper? Let's do it...
75%+ ? Would you like to elaborate how the other 25%+ is different? While you're at it, please do state the percentage of differences between 2 RNA viruses.
The current virus has already been recorded before. That is the point of this discussion. There is nothing novel about this.
From your first link: https://doi.org/10.1056%2FNEJMoa2001017
So they called this novel because it is 3.1% short of 90% from a three patient study?? Really? Why did they ignore traditional approaches? Who authorized them to conclude the results from these inaccurate methods?
From your second link: https://doi.org/10.1038%2Fs41586-020-2008-3
So they called this novel because it is 0.8% short of 90% from a one patient study?? Really?
From your third link: https://doi.org/10.1038%2Fs41586-020-2012-7
So they called this novel because it is 10.4% short of 90% from a 7 person study. But, they conclude saying that the replicase were 94.4% identical?
Look at the percentage variations in each of their studies. These are not accurate values, but approximations. You don't isolate and name a virus as novel based on numerous approximations! That's just wrong! The fact that these studies are done in China and the Chinese CDC's involvement should've made you question the authenticity of these tests, but you seem to ignore that!
Are you seriously asking for an official study against big pharma? Are you seriously willing to believe the next strain is covid-21 and so on? This "pay for play" is not going to end! If we ourselves are not skeptical in what these so called sell-out "experts" publish, then how will general population figure out all the corruption going on in the big pharma? Common now!
Big pharma has completely brainwashed our western society into taking OTC drugs as remedy for otherwise functioning natural body reactions! For eg:
If you still don't understand how the medical and pharmaceutical industries make money, then you should do little more research. I hope you've read the 5000 pages stimulus bill that was written years earlier and has got nothing to do with Covid-19 relief!
Moving on...let me ask you this, Can you provide an "official" study proving 2020 Election fraud published by any intelligence agencies funded by the Govt. and reported in the news? But, you can find plenty of local and independent studies proving it! Is it not?