A military flyover with an F-18 at a football game is a DEMONSTRATION of FORCE mission.
A military air strike with an F-18 is a USE of FORCE mission.
You wouldn’t fuel, takeoff, use the same facilities, use the same logistics, use the same flight path or use the same intel. The tempo of the engagement, the violence of action and the ability to seize the initiative would all be mutually exclusive logistics chains depending on DEMONSTRATION VS USE OF FORCE.
The point of the a DEMONSTRATION posture is to BE SEEN = Intimidation (people is stadium get within close proximity to the jet)
The point of the a USE of force posture is to AVOID BEING SEEN AND DESTROY THE ENEMY. (The people never see the jet and it fires from maximum distance proximity from the stadium)
Both missions involve the F-18 flying, they both involve the stadium... they have mutually exclusive logistics and velocity vectors.
Common sense op fren
As a quick ex -
A military flyover with an F-18 at a football game is a DEMONSTRATION of FORCE mission.
A military air strike with an F-18 is a USE of FORCE mission.
You wouldn’t fuel, takeoff, use the same facilities, use the same logistics, use the same flight path or use the same intel. The tempo of the engagement, the violence of action and the ability to seize the initiative would all be mutually exclusive logistics chains depending on DEMONSTRATION VS USE OF FORCE.
The point of the a DEMONSTRATION posture is to BE SEEN = Intimidation (people is stadium get within close proximity to the jet)
The point of the a USE of force posture is to AVOID BEING SEEN AND DESTROY THE ENEMY. (The people never see the jet and it fires from maximum distance proximity from the stadium)
Both missions involve the F-18 flying, they both involve the stadium... they have mutually exclusive logistics and velocity vectors.
You can’t do both and do either well...
Your grammar gives you up, Chinaman.
Hahaha say more - I’ll enjoy schooling you about this great country :)
FUCK THE CCP :)