If you cannot trust a twitter post, if you cant trust a MSM thread, If you cannot trust hearsay.. How exactly do you prove something is a good source of info on leaked intel?
Asking because it doesn't seem to matter where the info comes from its just spammed with SAUCE FK FAG SAUCE SAUCE etc.
Other than documented info, which ive also seen spammed with Sauce.. lol
The best strategy i have is this: don't focus on "where" the info came from, as much as "who" is giving the info. Do they have a reputation? Whats their track record for success? Anything thats even mildly Fake News, Twitter rando, or Q related is going to get acosted, with SAUCE. But citing something thats officially Trump related, or something like legal docs from a FOIA request is your safest bet.
And in general ALWAYS CHECK THE AUTHOR OF ANY ARTICLE YOU READ OR POST. This is honestly the biggest mistake I see on both sides of the aisle.
Gotcha!