I do not believe u/XtremePatriot intended this to be an end-all proof that Q is real (something like this is currently impossible for us to prove/disprove), but as a rebuttal. It casts doubt on the anti-Q position.
The answer to that question is subjective as it relies on an individual's preconceived notions going into reading the article and their interpretations of the arguments presented.
I seen you around quite a bit, you are an ardent Q hater and mock those who believe in him. So it is unlikely you would be persuaded by a pro-Q article. I on the other hand am the target audience for u/XtremePatriot 's post. I don't hate Q, but I doubted the validity. I always saw it more as a metaphor. I am now looking more into this prayingmedic website to see what else I can learn about Q. I am not a believer, but the article convinced me to hear out the Q case.
The article's job isn't to present arguments in favor of Q. Q already does that (whether you believe his arguments, YMMV) himself. What this article does is provide counter arguments to people such as yourself. For example. One major argument I have heard against Q is why would someone of such connections post on 4chan? The article responds:
Q originally posted on the 4chan internet board politically incorrect (sometimes called /pol/). That board was chosen for specific reasons. First, it’s an image board. Posts are displayed as images with text. It’s easy to take screenshots of messages and image files can be attached to posts. That makes it popular among meme artists.
Memes were instrumental in the 2016 Presidential election. Supporters of candidate Trump successfully defeated attempts by social media to censor their political views by using memes. Social media platforms use Artificial Intelligence to assess the meaning of posts, which can be downgraded in algorithms based on keywords. Memes convey messages without using text, thus Artificial Intelligence can’t accurately assign meaning to them.
4chan is known for its researchers (and hackers) who are adept at bringing together information found in articles, videos, public records and other sources. Those who post on 4chan can remain anonymous. By day the anons work as mechanics, legal assistants, waitresses and air traffic controllers. By night, they research the clues Q has dropped, without the knowledge of their employers.
This is a plausible explanation to the anti-Q position. So one major doubt I had in my mind ("Why 4chan") has been answered. Does this confirm the existence of Q? No. It does however strengthen the argument that Q exists by weakening the anti-Q arguments.
https://prepareforchange.net/2020/03/14/q-the-plan-to-save-the-world-remastered/
sorry but this does not proof shit
I didn’t claim it proved anything...I only stated that if you doubt Q to give it a read, insinuating that it might change your mind.
I do not believe u/XtremePatriot intended this to be an end-all proof that Q is real (something like this is currently impossible for us to prove/disprove), but as a rebuttal. It casts doubt on the anti-Q position.
no it doesnt
The answer to that question is subjective as it relies on an individual's preconceived notions going into reading the article and their interpretations of the arguments presented.
I seen you around quite a bit, you are an ardent Q hater and mock those who believe in him. So it is unlikely you would be persuaded by a pro-Q article. I on the other hand am the target audience for u/XtremePatriot 's post. I don't hate Q, but I doubted the validity. I always saw it more as a metaphor. I am now looking more into this prayingmedic website to see what else I can learn about Q. I am not a believer, but the article convinced me to hear out the Q case.
there are no real arguments presented that would support the reliability of q
May you explain more?
explain what
what arguments are presented ?
The article's job isn't to present arguments in favor of Q. Q already does that (whether you believe his arguments, YMMV) himself. What this article does is provide counter arguments to people such as yourself. For example. One major argument I have heard against Q is why would someone of such connections post on 4chan? The article responds:
This is a plausible explanation to the anti-Q position. So one major doubt I had in my mind ("Why 4chan") has been answered. Does this confirm the existence of Q? No. It does however strengthen the argument that Q exists by weakening the anti-Q arguments.
Q is a worthless time waster. It is now obvious that if the republic is going to be saved it will be we the people doing the hard work.
What if the plan Q says Trump has is that we will rise up?