567
Comments (28)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
-1
Balzydealz_in-facts -1 points ago +4 / -5

He already appointed Durham who has widen his scope of investigations to the elections and Bidens.. So hes right that there is no need for another special counsel..

2
deleted 2 points ago +8 / -6
1
_-Th0r-_ [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

He knows how his comments were going to be used in the media. I don’t see any “it isn’t needed, because we have Durham.”

0
Balzydealz_in-facts 0 points ago +1 / -1

I could be wrong but i do remember reading that he appointed Durham as special counsel and that Durham expanded his scope of investigations into election fraud and bidens...