3738
Comments (170)
sorted by:
298
deleted 298 points ago +300 / -2
184
ProphetOfKek 184 points ago +186 / -2

If he signs it, it is betrayal of us.

95
DemsFuckKids 95 points ago +96 / -1

he wont' sign that bs

103
HuggableBear 103 points ago +104 / -1

He said in 2017 that he would never again pass another funding bill full of bullshit.

He has since signed three more identical omnibus bills and two stimulus bills.

20
deleted 20 points ago +20 / -0
-24
shadows_of_the_mind -24 points ago +29 / -53

The more I think about it the more I think that Trump was allowed to win 2016 to placate an increasingly angry middle class. To make us feel like we have say in our political operation. Only to then hold him under duress and have him sign shit he doesn’t want to sign like bloated omnibus bills that are padded with goodies for the elites

44
Zeriel 44 points ago +57 / -13

If you don't believe in Trump then you're in the wrong place. For all of us here, he's the only thing we have left and that's why we support him.

61
SoyBoyDestroyer 61 points ago +63 / -2

We're not in a cult. We can have criticisms. Don't be the brainwashed left.

2
Zeriel 2 points ago +3 / -1

What Im saying is literally on the rules of this website. Also theres no time left for half meassures. Were fighting for our lives here, so youre either with us or against us.

33
deleted 33 points ago +34 / -1
11
deleted 11 points ago +12 / -1
11
Ivleeeg 11 points ago +11 / -0

I don't think that's what he's saying. I think he's saying they allowed it to happen to placate us but kept him from accomplishing any fundamental change that they couldn't rapidly undo by keeping him under duress.

3
Zeriel 3 points ago +3 / -0

I dont believe that for a second. They dont need to placate us because we're already placated and under control. They dont fear us and they dont give a shit about us. They keep destroying pur lives and giving our taxpayer money to illegals and foreign powers because they know we wont do anything about it.

Also they hate Trump more than Hitler. If they had to set America on fire to get rid of Trump they would. Oh wait theyre doing that right now.

3
shadows_of_the_mind 3 points ago +3 / -0

Precisely. Nothing too drastic that Biden (god forbid) or that the next guy in 2024 can’t undo. It all feels too... calculated.

4
shadows_of_the_mind 4 points ago +4 / -0

I have faith in Tump and only Trump. Not the dems, not the republicans, none of them. Just Trump. The enemies are on all sides. It’s why I said what I said. I mean think about it, he was most anti establish guy on that stage, his win was as Barnald would say, “rUvUhLoOsHuNaHrY”. Nobody expected him to win in 16. He thought the GOP would play ball with him and have his back, but time and again his own party backstabbed him. It really answers a lot of questions we have about the republicans being swampy shits to him for the last four years

3
Zeriel 3 points ago +3 / -0

I 100% believe that his win was God's intervention. Think about it, the Demonrats have been cheating for years without us knowing and never expected to lose. If were doing so bad right now imagine if we had 8 years of Hillary.

I also believe 100% that covid was no accident and the great reset to slave us all is underway. If this happened under Hillary there would be nothing we could do about it and we would be on our way to Communism slavery right now. I mean we are anyways but were fighting back.

Theres even Chinese Troops in Canada right now and Chinese spies everywhere. Theres no way this is all coincidence.

I think God gave us one last chance to rise up and take our freedom back because if America falls so will the rest of the world.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
shadows_of_the_mind 2 points ago +2 / -0

It’s just a theory, but it’s one of the few underlying variables we haven’t considered yet as to why the GOP has been so stone cold about backing Trump when he needs them most.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
1
everyman 1 point ago +1 / -0

It’s much simplified than that. Hillary lost, they mad.

That’s it. The rest are the consequences of beating their girl.

21
RivalPipe 21 points ago +21 / -0

What if he wipes his ass with it Airheads-style?

21
kornesque 21 points ago +21 / -0

And livestreams it illegally on OANN.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
11
rikkyyy 11 points ago +15 / -4

he might. maybe the pork is there for exactly this kind of conversation.... for example.... the billions going to a bunch of third world countries... bet they dont see a dime... bet its just a way to launder money...... if he does let this through it opens up the no-more-excuses for a january stimulus where if they do try to inject pork they will be mocked and exposed much more vigorously. think ahead.

21
Sugar4Brains 21 points ago +21 / -0

all AID of all kinds is just FED printed money going through a straw and back to globalist pockets... like Israel Aid is 90% spent back to contractors like Lockheed Martin... EBT is money that goes through the poor, and right to WalMart and Target groceries.

And now with trying to remove student debt.. that is Federal Loans to kids to the colleges and then wipe out the debt so it can continue for the next group...

8
rikkyyy 8 points ago +8 / -0

yeh the commies hit hard didnt they. take it up with dc on the 6th.

2
Smubbs 2 points ago +3 / -1

LMAO these fucking goalposts bro

2
rikkyyy 2 points ago +2 / -0

yeah... its pissin us all off.....

14
DonttrustChina 14 points ago +14 / -0

They're counting on him being a boomer who doesn't understand tech.

61
deleted 61 points ago +61 / -0
55
VoidWanderer 55 points ago +55 / -0

Veto at the last possible moment to cause them to scramble, hold a special session, and while they do so push out info of exactly what they're rushing to override like the traitors that they are. We need as many people as possible to know exactly what these fuckers are doing and to get to DC on the 6th.

20
Corky_Knightrider 20 points ago +20 / -0

Yeah if he doesnt veto this I'm jumping ship.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
2
Corky_Knightrider 2 points ago +2 / -0

Looks like hes still my guy.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
SecondFlamingo22 1 point ago +1 / -0

EOs only apply to federal officials under the executive branch and DC is under the jurisdiction of the Congress (legislative branch) so idk if it's possible to do anything about that with an EO

20
NotTheTendies 20 points ago +21 / -1

If he signs this... We were swayed.

32
deleted 32 points ago +33 / -1
13
Ivleeeg 13 points ago +14 / -1

No, it's not. It actually makes it very clear that there is only one solution to getting our country back.

11
deleted 11 points ago +11 / -0
6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
5
suitcasegate 5 points ago +5 / -0

Pelosi is literally holding people hostage omg...

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
187
feraxil 187 points ago +187 / -0

This is why I hate politicians.

Adding unrelated bullshit to a bill should be a capital offense.

99
deleted 99 points ago +99 / -0
30
Hanging_Chad 30 points ago +30 / -0

But then the lobbyists would lose their jobs. Come on man, think of the lobbyists

2
BigIronBigIron 2 points ago +2 / -0

Hey you're pretty good at that. You should do that professionally. I wonder what you could call it...

6
CEO_of_Muslims 6 points ago +6 / -0

You don’t throw out the baby with the bath water. Just outlaw the injection, and don’t allow them to poison the whole Bill with their nonsense.

5
Kimball_Kinnison 5 points ago +5 / -0

They tried for a line-item veto, but it was ruled unconstitutional.

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
1
Destineed369 1 point ago +1 / -0

The states don’t have to so neither do we.

2
SSConservativePride 2 points ago +2 / -0

Interesting how that works The New Republicans want to use the Constitution to stop the fraud its totally ineffectual. The establishment wants to use the Constitution to prop up their BS habits its priceless!

23
utfanx2 23 points ago +23 / -0

Should follow TN regs that the name of the bill has to accurately describe what's in it.

12
Rayder 12 points ago +12 / -0

Sadly this has been the way of things since the 1790s, it has gotten out of hand though.

5
Jaybird91 5 points ago +5 / -0

Well it started as a way of doing shit like repairing roads in your district. Things like that which are not awful.

This is a complete step beyond what is right.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
129
Coslin 129 points ago +129 / -0

Just another way to shutdown "alternative media".

52
deleted 52 points ago +55 / -3
5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
113
thecave888 113 points ago +116 / -3

Good Lord.

Total Chicom move right out in the open.

75
deleted 75 points ago +75 / -0
38
deleted 38 points ago +40 / -2
30
uzi5v2 30 points ago +31 / -1

China. North Korea. Soviet Russia. Nazi Germany.

18
deleted 18 points ago +18 / -0
2
swimminginthoughts 2 points ago +2 / -0

Report to the central office of compliance for re education immediately!

1
Necalli 1 point ago +1 / -0

Still will keep the services in question shut down for the few months until the court ruling.

72
deleted 72 points ago +72 / -0
18
sgttoporbottoms 18 points ago +18 / -0

DC should be razed

67
Becausewhyn0t 67 points ago +68 / -1

Come on people wake up faster.

5
shadows_of_the_mind 5 points ago +10 / -5

It’s too late

60
CloakAndDagger 60 points ago +60 / -0

What the fuck does streaming has to do with chinkenpox relief? Everybody in Swampington DC should be fucking SHOT

-with the pfizer vaccine.

5
Fattdex 5 points ago +5 / -0

In Minecraft

1
massivehairycleaner 1 point ago +1 / -0

By an NPC with a limp dick for a nose.

2
Destineed369 2 points ago +2 / -0

I’m stealing swampington thanks 👍

1
CloakAndDagger 1 point ago +2 / -1

It's okay, they are stealing your tax money.

2
Destineed369 2 points ago +2 / -0

Too true man. Too true 😔

51
VA_MAGApede 51 points ago +51 / -0

“Foreign aid” is how the swamp sends money to itself, just look at who was involved with Bursima besides Hunter. Pelosi’s son, Kerry’s step son, one of Romney’s staff and on it goes

19
FromSethWithLove 19 points ago +19 / -0

100% yes

6
richmomz 6 points ago +6 / -0

This - it’s basically a gigantic money-laundering scheme. Foreign military interventions serve this purpose as well.

3
isellmacs2 3 points ago +3 / -0

Remember the impeachment hoax? Alexander Vinderman, thought to be the original "whistleblower" who shared information with Eric Ciaramella, was asked while testifying about sending foreign aid to fund kickbacks to family members of DC politicians. His response was to hand wave it, that that's just the way it works and over half of DC has family members getting those sorts of kickbacks. Nothing weird or unusual at all. The DC media applauded the response as an excellent point.

It was an amazingly tone deaf statement to make. Yeah we're all pretty much crooks ripping off the American people. Biden doing it isn't anything special, since everybody is doing it and have been for a long time.

34
el_gato_pepe 34 points ago +34 / -0

That's how you know this was always about the virus. /s

31
HotCarl 31 points ago +31 / -0

Keep the fucking $600. The provisions of this legislative pile of trash need to be shared far and wide.

26
FromSethWithLove 26 points ago +26 / -0

GEOTUS, VETO PLEASE

26
geocitiesuser 26 points ago +26 / -0

Why is it impossible to have a bill that only addresses one issue, without all the pork barrelling and special interests? It's no wonder government is so broken.

There should be laws against amending bills outside of their scope!

7
BillionsAndBillions 7 points ago +7 / -0

K Street lobbyists for international corporations and foreign governments submitting hundreds of bills that all get bundled as part of swamp deal making

4
Kimball_Kinnison 4 points ago +4 / -0

That was the idea behind the line-item veto, but it got shot down as unconstitutional.

22
EyesInTheHills 22 points ago +22 / -0

This is a clear step towards creating state run media. It kneecaps independent journalism, reduces accountability, and makes it very easy for the government to shut dissenting voices out. Freedom of the press was the one thing I didn't think was at risk, seeing as the media is almost entirely compromised, but I guess I was wrong...

13
KiTA [S] 13 points ago +13 / -0

No, the trick is, they outsource this stuff to an official state approved monopoly, and thus any constitutional questions are bypassed.

The state isn't allowed to crush your first amendment rights. But if the state filters all public communications through 3 or 4 megacorps, and those corporations crush your speech, it's legal.

7
EyesInTheHills 7 points ago +7 / -0

That's a better way of putting it and essentially what they already do with social media, streaming, banking, etc. The government doesn't have to directly curtail your rights if they have a corporation do it on their behalf. That the corporations are also a part of a collective with other financial interests and our political parties muddies the waters, but that doesn't matter when the judicial system is also compromised.

5
isellmacs2 5 points ago +5 / -0

There is a term for that fusion of Media, Corporations and the State. It's called Fascism.

5
RussianAgent13 5 points ago +5 / -0

Maybe Corporations should be... incorporated, the way states and cities are. So the same restrictions that apply to Congress apply to them.

20
LetMeBeFrank 20 points ago +20 / -0

Yall still think we shouldn't just kill all these sick motherfuckers? Still gonna play a dumb cucked moralizer about it?

13
Data 13 points ago +13 / -0

Way past time to water that tree.

6
LetMeBeFrank 6 points ago +6 / -0

Not just water...drench it.

16
Kek_Priest_Wunderbar 16 points ago +16 / -0

NC Senator Tom Thillis (R) is the one who put that in. He tried to make it a felony for people to stream copyrighted material earlier but it died. Now he stuck it in this one.

15
Reborned20 15 points ago +15 / -0

No, President Trump, Don't Sign this Bill.

15
FloridaACguy 15 points ago +15 / -0

VETO!

4
Data 4 points ago +4 / -0

TRIPLE DOG VETO, NO TAKESIES BACKSIES!

13
Eris 13 points ago +13 / -0

Are the purposely trying to make trump veto this so they can censor everything else in the bill and say Trump removed funding for American families so they try to have supporters turn on him and not get 5-10 mil at the DC rally? He should veto it and do an executive order instead, fucking cunts.

1
deleted 1 point ago +3 / -2
12
rikkyyy 12 points ago +12 / -0

the pork keeps getting worse... wow.... i was for trump saying ''fuck it let it happen so i can order a direct no-pork 2000 dollar in january without pork and they have no excuses" -- now.... now if this is really true..... thats... naw.... fuck that.

7
RussianAgent13 7 points ago +7 / -0

Yeah the foreign aid was bullshit but this crossed the line for me.

10
deleted 10 points ago +10 / -0
10
suckmycorona 10 points ago +10 / -0

Nothing to do with relief. I hate our government politics

9
MondayCoupleIsDead 9 points ago +9 / -0

Has anyone with a twitter account shown this to everyone who has the President's ear, like JR.? Better make a stink now or things are gonna get stupidly bad.

And call out Thom Tillis too. This piece of shit, corrupt, RINO faggot has his bullshit jammed into this too. It's all fucking bad from both sides.

7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
5
BurgerChef90 5 points ago +5 / -0

Did you read the donations he got? A lot of donations from film studios and record labels. Yeah, no shit. Only someone getting bribed by them, would do something like this

3
MrOrangeHorseman 3 points ago +3 / -0

Can't believe I ever supported that globalist fuck.

9
Mojozowa 9 points ago +9 / -0

Would not effect fair use Law ? As far as I could tell it is more for stopping people restreaming live news or sports . Shes still a cunt though .

2
TrumpTrainChoooChoo2 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yea I didn’t read anything that would restrict people’s reaction and how this would ban infowars for example. Feel free to correct me if I’m wrong but it seems aimed towards people illegally streaming live sports, etc...not people reacting to videos.

7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
6
TrumpTrainChoooChoo2 6 points ago +6 / -0

Good point. I agree this should 100% be vetoed for multiple reasons

2
patriotblend 2 points ago +2 / -0

Most copyright claims on youtube are BS, either algorithm detected or fake companies trolling making claims on random videos to steal a couple days ad revenue until it's overturned.

Imagine if activity similar to that results in auto felony charges against conservatives. That's not too far down the slippery slope from here. The new Obama-IRS scheme just rehashed with a new veneer.

1
EricCharliemella 1 point ago +1 / -0

I think anytime laws are not crystal clear, people will naturally avoid a situation altogether. While it may not outright ban the streaming it will render some unsure, and they won't enter the proverbial arena.

9
TeeBP 9 points ago +9 / -0

What the fuck does this have to do with a virus

7
DonttrustChina 7 points ago +7 / -0

Also, gives the entertainment lobbies an extrajudicial kangaroo court for copyright shit. They've by now backdoored SOPA in piecemeal.

7
rocco_saint 7 points ago +7 / -0

The legislation is co-sponsored by Senators Patrick Leahy (D-VT), Marsha Blackburn (R-TN), Mazie Hirono (D-HI), Catherine Cortez Masto (D-NV), John Cornyn (R-TX), Richard Blumenthal (D-CT), Chris Coons (D-DE), Kelly Loeffler (R-GA), and David Perdue (R-GA).

Source

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
6
DeadOverRed 6 points ago +6 / -0

More communism. It's coming.

6
DeadLivesMatter 6 points ago +6 / -0

Next bills needed will be ROLAIDS relief bill and FREE LUBE bill. It’ll make swallowing all this CCP Virus Relief just that much easier.

6
shadows_of_the_mind 6 points ago +6 / -0

Never let a good crisis go to waste, folks

6
DaayTerkErJerbs 6 points ago +6 / -0

The way your framed that it makes me think of Crowders live streaming of say the debates or election night and not covering something like a news article after the fact.

4
Weallseethetruth 4 points ago +4 / -0

I believe your right... From what I read of it I think it's just saying you can not steam LIVE EVENTS ... I think this is to cut down on how many people are pointing out that Trump gets thousands more views for just waving to the crowd than Biden gets at his press conferences.... They also don't want the Trump rallies to be broadcast and they FOR SURE don't want the 6th to be broadcast!

6
Jcholl9 6 points ago +6 / -0

Well it looks like the $600.00 won't be happening which will be okay with me.

I don't think Trump will be signing this unless this nonsense is removed and all other crap!

Was waiting for Pelosi to fuck this UP

4
lilree 4 points ago +4 / -0

I keep hearing there are enough RINOs to ram it through anyway.

Trump, please don't sign this bullshit.

1
Jcholl9 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well Trump shouldn't sign it and he better explain why... Because the moment he rejects this Congress will say Trump doesn't care about the American people.

And if he dose sign it? Those of us who know better will think he betrayed us?

The TRAP has been set!

5
JudicialDredd 5 points ago +5 / -0

Holy fuck.

4
JigglesV 4 points ago +4 / -0

The milktoast just went sour. Happy holidays doomer.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
4
1PhantomStranger 4 points ago +4 / -0

VETO!!

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
4
vacu 4 points ago +4 / -0

These people need to be strung up from lamp posts.

4
Chuck_U_Farley 4 points ago +4 / -0

Keep the $600 bucks if these are the strings attached.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
3
Anon1388306 3 points ago +3 / -0

If they do this tdw will be number one. We will literally be the news

3
CoupCoupKaChew 3 points ago +3 / -0

That's $600.00 worth of pelosi shit in your hand.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
2
paramour 2 points ago +2 / -0

...but they can ban anyone for nothing on their cuck social communist platforms. Twisted evil bastards.

1
POWESHOW 1 point ago +3 / -2

Google voice. Learn it. Love it.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
AmericaFloats 2 points ago +2 / -0

Lol try banning Alex Jones

2
angryamerican1964 2 points ago +2 / -0

Censorious treasonous bitch

2
RabidZoo 2 points ago +2 / -0

FUCK THAT ROTTEN TWAT CUNT.

SORRY FOR BEING CRUDE LADY PEDES...BUT THAT HAG HAS SOME FUCKING NERVE.

2
Weallseethetruth 2 points ago +2 / -0

So it's this basically like "any unauthorized recording or reshowing of this game of the NFL is illegal and can give jail time" lol ... Is it something like that?? I mean what would Tim Pool for instance have to change?

6
KiTA [S] 6 points ago +6 / -0

He reads copyrighted news article off live on air. He shows them on the screen as he does so.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
7
darthjson 7 points ago +8 / -1

Basically independent news commentators would be out and only "authoritative news outlets" (state sponsored) will be allowed. I wonder if this would mean that Brian Steltzer can no longer bitch about what's happening on Fox? Or if they will asymmetrically enforce it...like they always do to shut down the little guy. My guess is the later.