I've pondered this as well. I wasn't interested in politics at the time, so I would guess that they didn't have the votes in a contingent election that Trump does this time around.
If this is the actual plan. We have lost. Thats the truth, maybe our president as other plans but if people think thats a winning path they need to wake up.
The difference, kids, is that actual CONTESTED STATES (legal terms, do some reading!) have submitted DUELING ELECTORS, based on legal hearings )legislatures and courts) with submitted EVIDENCE into the public record of vast amounts of FRAUD. Constitutional remedy and precedent both exist and are in the favor of the true winner of the election.
The D screeching from having their plans thwarted in 2016 was all hot air - when their tool constituents started fund raising and demanding audits, they stamped down their own people, because the LAST thing they wanted was an audit. Their cheating last time was insufficient, and this time it was again, and they STILL fight tooth and nail against audit. Go see how their little faces shut down in 2016 when their fervent zombies screamed 'the Rs cheated, we want a recount'! Were there any recounts, ever, that favored the Ds? Why not?
What else is different, as if there were a need for more? Deaths, sudden and violent, that plague young men and investigators around the corrupt and their collaborators.
I've pondered this as well. I wasn't interested in politics at the time, so I would guess that they didn't have the votes in a contingent election that Trump does this time around.
I don’t think they had alternate electors either, so maybe that’s what’s different this time around?
If this is the actual plan. We have lost. Thats the truth, maybe our president as other plans but if people think thats a winning path they need to wake up.
Victory hopefully
The collection of idiocracy here is astounding.
The difference, kids, is that actual CONTESTED STATES (legal terms, do some reading!) have submitted DUELING ELECTORS, based on legal hearings )legislatures and courts) with submitted EVIDENCE into the public record of vast amounts of FRAUD. Constitutional remedy and precedent both exist and are in the favor of the true winner of the election.
The D screeching from having their plans thwarted in 2016 was all hot air - when their tool constituents started fund raising and demanding audits, they stamped down their own people, because the LAST thing they wanted was an audit. Their cheating last time was insufficient, and this time it was again, and they STILL fight tooth and nail against audit. Go see how their little faces shut down in 2016 when their fervent zombies screamed 'the Rs cheated, we want a recount'! Were there any recounts, ever, that favored the Ds? Why not?
What else is different, as if there were a need for more? Deaths, sudden and violent, that plague young men and investigators around the corrupt and their collaborators.