That's the same exact thing that I said. Repeal/remove Rule 230. Then the problem goes away. I know you don't grasp this. You're in good company. Bueno suerte.
Just enforce. Treat the publishers as publishers, and not platforms. If we just enforce it as it's written, we're fine. We have all these problems because publishers like Youtube, Twitter, Facebook are still being treated as platforms instead of publishers.
I'm glad you think it's so funny cunt. I'm not a shill. I support Trump. And, unlike you, I know that Rule 230 PROTECTS the companies that are claiming to be Platforms, but acting like Publishers. Unfortunately, thedonald.win doesn't allow you to block or deport people, or else your gay ass wouldn't still be on my radar screen, you cock-sucking faggot. :)
I'm glad you think it's so funny cunt. I'm not a shill. I support Trump. And, unlike you, I know that Rule 230 PROTECTS the companies that are claiming to be Platforms, but acting like Publishers. Unfortunately, thedonald.win doesn't allow you to block or deport people, or else your gay ass wouldn't still be on my radar screen, you cock-sucking faggot. :)
Look at those little words underneath my post. They start with "permalink." The third from the right is "block." Feel free to block me, now that you know how. The one to the left of that is "deport." Feel free to try to deport me, though I have not broken any rules. You read this site as well as you read Rule 230.
No. You don't get it. Rule 230 protects them from being sued/liable. I know you don't get this. It's obvious. Apparently, you're in good company. But Rule 230 prevents you from suing them for censoring you. Remove Rule 230, and you can sue them for censoring you. That's about as clear as I can make it.
I have read Rule 230. I know what it does and says. It protects platforms. Publishers can still be sued. Since those companies are curating their content, they are publishers under the rules. Thus, they should be legally liable for every criminal act committed on their sites. If they want to continue having platform protections, id the law is enforced, we should be able to sue them for censoring us. The issue here is it is not being enforced. You think we will have any more ability to sue them if 230 is removed? Nope. And in addition, without 230, any leftist yahoo can go onto this site, threaten a public figure, and the mods and owners of the site are criminally liable for it.
Are you mad? If they dont have protection from being sued they will have an excuse to never let a conservative voice on their platforms ever again! Any hint of a channel saying things that could upset or offend a leftist would result in hundreds of lawsuits for the company which they could not afford and so would be overly stringent on policing this stuff.
It would be the biggest own goal in history and practically hand the country over to leftists forever. It just needs rewriting to be clearer and properly enforcing.
You don't grasp it. At all. It has nothing to do with whether or not I'm upset. You can sue them for censoring you (if they do). I can see that you don't grasp that. It's OK. You're in good company. But yes, you could absolutely sue them for censoring you. That's what Rule 230 does. If you think it doesn't do anything, then remove it and find out.
Honestly, guns rot your brains: what is this suicidal fantasy about outgunning the police dept? If you show up in numbers large enough, you don't need bloodshed - at most, bruising. It shows you don't belong to politics, if all you can think about when it comes to counter the state, is shooting them.
Do you see the left doing that? No, they are threatening but always within the limits of what you can get away with legally. Do the same faggot.
When the Left protests, it's like an army marching through town: they don't shoot anyone, but the show of strength and pressure is immense. BLM clearly showed they are stronger than Trump in that regard.
Of course there's been cases of egregious violence, like David Dorn's and Kyle's - and for those crimes, Biden should be prevented from getting to the WH by any means. But they're different situations, you can still employ their swarming and presence tactics without looting. Crimes during protests happen for the very organic reason that the left harvests votes and partecipation among jobless
criminals.
Yes, but what action? TDW always splits along the false dichotomy 'do nothing\shoot everyone'. It's unrealistic escapism.
You go there en masse and you enter, make demands by force. Don't have the numbers? Then in the very least stop posturing about 1776 on the interwebs: it's fun but harmful, because it keeps people satisfied for a last minute save that will never happen.
Time to mount an overwhelming defense. Time to call the largest standing army on the planet. Time for tyrants to remember their tyranny is only possible because the People allow it. We will allow it no longer.
That was the first thing I did when I saw this thread - I looked up the calendar. But, if there IS a hearing tomorrow, they may do it via Zoom. I'm not saying that will happen.
I think it’s a lot of talk and no action. Almost like they want it to LOOK like they are trying but at the end of the day will say “WE TRIED” but couldn’t succeed. I think if one state has the balls to do this others will follow.
This might be a bad source that got to him, and he deleted it afterwards when he realized it was fake, Rudy is human too. Thats why we should work as our own fact checkers, only feed these people gold or their reputation will suffer.
They're not liberals, they have no concept of free thinking and new progressive ideas or open debate. They're fascists plain and simple. Their response to disagreement is censorship and they love to fix their oposition
ALT TECH - gotta keep using it to build it up but it would really help if Trump, Rudy, Powell & other leadership would get on these sites and make their announcements.
Filled with lava
Until we repeal Rule 230 protections (which prevents us from suing them), the internet monopolies will continue to censor our free speech.
That's the same exact thing that I said. Repeal/remove Rule 230. Then the problem goes away. I know you don't grasp this. You're in good company. Bueno suerte.
Just enforce. Treat the publishers as publishers, and not platforms. If we just enforce it as it's written, we're fine. We have all these problems because publishers like Youtube, Twitter, Facebook are still being treated as platforms instead of publishers.
Yup, pretty sure he is, claiming "I'll work with the mods to get you banned since you can't understand this" 😂🤣😂🤣
I'm glad you think it's so funny cunt. I'm not a shill. I support Trump. And, unlike you, I know that Rule 230 PROTECTS the companies that are claiming to be Platforms, but acting like Publishers. Unfortunately, thedonald.win doesn't allow you to block or deport people, or else your gay ass wouldn't still be on my radar screen, you cock-sucking faggot. :)
Sorry, douchebag. I'm not a shill. Sorry that you don't grasp Rule 230.
I'm glad you think it's so funny cunt. I'm not a shill. I support Trump. And, unlike you, I know that Rule 230 PROTECTS the companies that are claiming to be Platforms, but acting like Publishers. Unfortunately, thedonald.win doesn't allow you to block or deport people, or else your gay ass wouldn't still be on my radar screen, you cock-sucking faggot. :)
Look at those little words underneath my post. They start with "permalink." The third from the right is "block." Feel free to block me, now that you know how. The one to the left of that is "deport." Feel free to try to deport me, though I have not broken any rules. You read this site as well as you read Rule 230.
No. You don't get it. Rule 230 protects them from being sued/liable. I know you don't get this. It's obvious. Apparently, you're in good company. But Rule 230 prevents you from suing them for censoring you. Remove Rule 230, and you can sue them for censoring you. That's about as clear as I can make it.
I have read Rule 230. I know what it does and says. It protects platforms. Publishers can still be sued. Since those companies are curating their content, they are publishers under the rules. Thus, they should be legally liable for every criminal act committed on their sites. If they want to continue having platform protections, id the law is enforced, we should be able to sue them for censoring us. The issue here is it is not being enforced. You think we will have any more ability to sue them if 230 is removed? Nope. And in addition, without 230, any leftist yahoo can go onto this site, threaten a public figure, and the mods and owners of the site are criminally liable for it.
No thank you.
Are you mad? If they dont have protection from being sued they will have an excuse to never let a conservative voice on their platforms ever again! Any hint of a channel saying things that could upset or offend a leftist would result in hundreds of lawsuits for the company which they could not afford and so would be overly stringent on policing this stuff.
It would be the biggest own goal in history and practically hand the country over to leftists forever. It just needs rewriting to be clearer and properly enforcing.
You don't grasp it. At all. It has nothing to do with whether or not I'm upset. You can sue them for censoring you (if they do). I can see that you don't grasp that. It's OK. You're in good company. But yes, you could absolutely sue them for censoring you. That's what Rule 230 does. If you think it doesn't do anything, then remove it and find out.
Lavacast the whole capitol! It's gonna be a cobblestone mountain soon!
Well to be fair it’s in the job description of being a police officer.
It will not happen from a centralised forum such as this. At best it'll get this page shut down for promoting terrorism.
It has to happen locally and decentralised. Don't tell us. Tell your neighbours.
Honestly, guns rot your brains: what is this suicidal fantasy about outgunning the police dept? If you show up in numbers large enough, you don't need bloodshed - at most, bruising. It shows you don't belong to politics, if all you can think about when it comes to counter the state, is shooting them.
Do you see the left doing that? No, they are threatening but always within the limits of what you can get away with legally. Do the same faggot.
The left burnt down buildings and assaulted police officers for months over an OD.
They are commiting illegal acts, they just get no consequences for their actions.
When the Left protests, it's like an army marching through town: they don't shoot anyone, but the show of strength and pressure is immense. BLM clearly showed they are stronger than Trump in that regard.
Of course there's been cases of egregious violence, like David Dorn's and Kyle's - and for those crimes, Biden should be prevented from getting to the WH by any means. But they're different situations, you can still employ their swarming and presence tactics without looting. Crimes during protests happen for the very organic reason that the left harvests votes and partecipation among jobless criminals.
They definitely have shot and stabbed people. There's a picture of one shooting fire at someone.
"Legally". I think you meant what they can get away with without consequences. Arson and assault are still illegal, even for the left.
A year’s worth of “mostly peaceful” protests says different.
Then again, if large amounts of pedes get shot, then it'll be spun as a massacre by true media, and shit will hit the fan.
Oh you know, just some casual threats of terrorism. You don't need to shoot anyone to make a fucking point.
Idiot.
Honestly, at this point its looking like you do.
Seriously. The only reason this is dragging out is because they are scared of the left. They need to be scared of US.
We need to get this TO THE TOP, STICKIED, and a CALL TO ACTION.
Yes, but what action? TDW always splits along the false dichotomy 'do nothing\shoot everyone'. It's unrealistic escapism.
You go there en masse and you enter, make demands by force. Don't have the numbers? Then in the very least stop posturing about 1776 on the interwebs: it's fun but harmful, because it keeps people satisfied for a last minute save that will never happen.
If this is true can we get a sticky so people will show up?!
Time to mount an overwhelming defense. Time to call the largest standing army on the planet. Time for tyrants to remember their tyranny is only possible because the People allow it. We will allow it no longer.
I feel like if one state does it, that will open the flood gates for the remainder. It's just that nobody wants to be first.
What state do we have the most legal progress in ?
Wisconsin, I guess.
Accurate guess.
My guess would be az or wis
Perhaps a different question, but the answer is the same. Which state has the highest percentage of "us" per capita?
Nothing on the AZ legislature calendar
I can’t even tell what’s real anymore.
Disinformation level is over 1000% at this point.
That's true. I haven't known Rudy to just go blowing smoke up our asses. I wonder if it's a special session so it doesn't show up?
wouldnt even be surprised if thedonald.win was run by russians. what do you know about shadowman3001?
Nah dude thats doomer talk. It's never Over. Lol
I was being sarcastic.
Spotted the tard.
Douchey is a RINO correct?
Spotted the tard
That was the first thing I did when I saw this thread - I looked up the calendar. But, if there IS a hearing tomorrow, they may do it via Zoom. I'm not saying that will happen.
maybe the don't want anyone to find out so soros can't send his minions, or it too last minute
How do we know Twitter deleted it? How do we know Rudy did not delete the tweet himself?
Did he even post this
I'm getting the feeling that even when Trump takes back his landslide win, the media won't care. They will block everything and say Biden won.
Yup.
Ukraine better extradite him soon then
How do we know Twatter deleted it? I believe they probably did but it could have been Rudy or someone else with access to the account.
I seen this tweet I have rudy on my notifications. Seen it right after he posted it. I just looked it gone now.
He might've deleted it because it was disinfo.
Domino effect at work.
This claim about the possibility of fraud is disputed
Do we have any proof he said this or if it is in fact a deleted tweet? And from when?
AZ Pedes Godspeed. Please go and force this.
Twitter needs their doors kicked in.
I think it’s a lot of talk and no action. Almost like they want it to LOOK like they are trying but at the end of the day will say “WE TRIED” but couldn’t succeed. I think if one state has the balls to do this others will follow.
This might be a bad source that got to him, and he deleted it afterwards when he realized it was fake, Rudy is human too. Thats why we should work as our own fact checkers, only feed these people gold or their reputation will suffer.
They're not liberals, they have no concept of free thinking and new progressive ideas or open debate. They're fascists plain and simple. Their response to disagreement is censorship and they love to fix their oposition
Show.
Is this true?
maybe you try to figure this out yourself instead of asking a bunch of super biased radical zealots.
The difference between the left and the right on the election fraud is this...
The right (correctly) tries to prove election fraud with evidence.
The left just pretends it didn’t happen - and ignores all evidence.
This is how the left operates: https://youtu.be/uPCzjHPS--U
They are litteraly the leaders of the lost boys (and everything in between)...
And somehow - it seems to work... nothing you can say will convince them of their illusion.
"Following the leader, wherever he may go..."
Nothing on Parker from him, I think this is bullshit frens.
He could have deleted it bc the hearing was cancelled.
Retweeted for justice.. because fuck twitter.
G-damnit!!!!! I'll say it again I FUCKING HATE TWOTTERS!!!!!
Why? Because he said a day and time of a government hearing?
Give the number outta state but I'll call
ALT TECH - gotta keep using it to build it up but it would really help if Trump, Rudy, Powell & other leadership would get on these sites and make their announcements.
PLEASE BE TRUE!!!
All of big tech is a pryo in Minecraft.
I just posted this on gab and it well move to be viral. and it wont be blocked or censored
praying and contacting tonight. If true, better if MSM doesn't hear until it's done i think
Will it be public?
Bring pitchforks it’s a farming tool. Attach a flag and form a line. A few hundred people with pitchforks err I mean flags is scary to say the least.
Upvote this pedes lets get this to the top!
It is past time to get off Twitter. See How to use decentralized or distributed network communication
Let's make this happen people...