11
Comments (19)
sorted by:
9
maximum10231 9 points ago +9 / -0

okay so literal foreign interference happens which the act was created for and now it would be undermining the law to use it? also to my knowledge Trump said Martial law was off the table.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
8
deleted 8 points ago +8 / -0
7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
5
aceshigh34 5 points ago +5 / -0

It was, Ellis is clueless

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
4
Varx 4 points ago +4 / -0

Why can't republicans ever play hardball? Democrats constantly break and cheat the law.

Why is it so bad to use an executive order that is part of the law. I don't get it...

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
4
BOBON0101 4 points ago +4 / -0

What fucking law you are talking about Jenna ? The courts and judges in this banana republic don't follow the law .. So fuck you .. Insurrection Act now !!

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
3
Boogiddy 3 points ago +3 / -0

Not to mention that the Army already came out and said they're not touching it. No military involvement means no martial law. Trump better stop listening to these people, rediscover his balls and start firing and replacing a whole lot of people NOW or our January 6 is going to be completely irrelevant. It's all on him now and he doesn't have until January 6 or January 20.

1
young_roshi 1 point ago +1 / -0

To be specific, the Chief of Staff said he wouldn't support martial law. For him to directly disobey an order from POTUS, he'd better be damn sure it's upholding the Constitution (which I doubt). He needs to be fired yesterday and put some hawks in charge.

2
LibertarianWalkz 2 points ago +2 / -0

I hate to say this, but is Trump TRYING to let them get away with stealing this shit?

2
young_roshi 2 points ago +2 / -0

If this were a boxing match, we'd have our hands tied behind our backs, and our opponent is head-butting and kneeing in full view of the ref and spectators.

2
Soferio 2 points ago +2 / -0

It's his only choice literally.... with this new veto proof Bill do you really think anyone will stand against fraud?

1
MakeALaskaGreatAgain 1 point ago +1 / -0

another thing to consider - if you are going to use martial law or the IA who would admit to that in advance.

I really don't think of my president as a liar but this is WAR!

1
deleted 1 point ago +2 / -1