2630
Comments (148)
sorted by:
166
brxn 166 points ago +166 / -0

reads like panicked reporting..

66
Clandestiny 66 points ago +68 / -2

It's Steve Job's wife that's in charge of Axios. They're fucking rare air fruitcakey over there for sure!

35
deleted 35 points ago +35 / -0
26
Clandestiny 26 points ago +26 / -0

You're right, she is a major investor in Axios though as well.

2
The_banned 2 points ago +2 / -0

She's gonna be a major investor in the civil aar if she doesn't watch her shit.

11
SvixGale 11 points ago +11 / -0

O Rly? Interesting....

-3
trumpforeverandever -3 points ago +11 / -14

Oh that whore....never could figure out why Steve married that cunt in the first place. Nothing but an airheaded ignorant bitch. Although to be fair that's pretty much all women so...

9
jpower 9 points ago +12 / -3

There are lots of based women as there are men.

Just like there are faggotty men and women.

Cuckiness doesn't go by gender.

0
zedrexvsyrex 0 points ago +2 / -2

It sure as hell does. Go look up the gender differences on the election map. Women are retarded.

2
TangoMike 2 points ago +3 / -1

Women are designed to be more emotional, caring, and empathetic than men. This is critical for caretaking and motherhood.

Those features have no place in government, though. Right voice, wrong place. Should they have a voice in governance? We can argue that.

Women are amazing.

1
zedrexvsyrex 1 point ago +1 / -0

Not tryna be that guy but sorry bro, my bullshit meter is going off the charts. Women commit infanticide at much higher rates than men and always have, historically-speaking. They’re just overglorified because “muh womyn” and feminist Bob the Builder “can we build it? Yes we can! Gurl pwr!” i.e. Rosie the Riveter garbage. And women are more neurotic than men, not necessarily emotional. Get your facts straight.

5
WeaponizedSmirk 5 points ago +6 / -1

Common man, my wife is more Right-wing than everyone here lol. LEFTIST women are vapid thots.

4
MAGA_Skydog 4 points ago +6 / -2

@trumpforeverandever: Your negative IQ is apparent.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
23
deleted 23 points ago +23 / -0
13
WeaponizedSmirk 13 points ago +13 / -0

Their plan was literally to steal the election and then use the power of social media and legacy media to pound into people's head that Biden won. That's why they have those weird preconference with "Office of the President Elect" behind him. They say it over and over and over and they attack, smear, and deplatform people that challenge that narrative. They have the power to control what the low info voters see and unfortunately they are a significant portion of the population.

10
lordvon 10 points ago +10 / -0

news has totally gone insane.

5
Libertas_Vel_Mors 5 points ago +5 / -0

Reminds me way too much of Baghdad Bob, truth be told.

4
WeaponizedSmirk 4 points ago +4 / -0

Aww I miss that guy.

1
basilpesto 1 point ago +1 / -0

EXACTLY

75
ScottButNotBaio 75 points ago +75 / -0

Time is not on Trump’s side. He needs to take action SOON

27
jpower 27 points ago +29 / -2

No it's not, but he hasn't been sitting around either

13
AOCsList 13 points ago +17 / -4

I need so see something soon because at this point I am starting to see the black pill.

26
DemsFuckKids 26 points ago +27 / -1

go take a break. we'll hold the line for you

17
MAGAngelo 17 points ago +17 / -0

My pede.

14
AOCsList 14 points ago +14 / -0

I'll be back soon! Thank you friend

23
Redpillgirlfrommars 23 points ago +23 / -0

You gotta understand there’s stuff going on behind the scenes we may never know about.

I’m not a qtard, so this isn’t “trust the plan”. But we know the kind of person Trump is. Among many great qualities, Trump is very cocky, narcissistic, and he knows he’s the best, and he likes to flaunt that he’s the best (I’m not shitting on Trump, I think these are qualities that make him the perfect guy for the job). Trump is NOT a loser. Do you honestly think Trump would hand Biden the keys after Biden royally fucked his historic victory that he would LOVE to bask in the glory of?

C’mon. CMON.

Trump is going to do everything in his power to prove to the world he won, and by historic numbers. It’s easier to believe in santa claus than it is to believe Trump would roll over and take the loss.

3
WeaponizedSmirk 3 points ago +3 / -0

I'm right there. I don't want to be but they just bombard you with the orange man bad, Biden won bullshit. It's everywhere, there is no escape. I come here for that. This is the only place left to go. This place is keeping me going.

4
whippeat 4 points ago +4 / -0

Problem is, everything moves so fucking slowly. If there WAS evidence on voting machines, they’ve been wiped, formatted, firmware updated now. Ballots burned or shredded. New ones printed. You’ll never find anything meaningful weeks after the election.

2
jpower 2 points ago +2 / -0

Well maybe they have found it, but are waiting for a proper day in court

1
Eroticaenthusiast 1 point ago +1 / -0

Maybe they never needed to. The most compelling evidence trump could bring out, would be a confession, a deepstate turncoat. Somebody that was trusted by the other side telling all. If he has that, then everything else is just sprinkles.

7
TimeTravelingTrump 7 points ago +8 / -1

Timing is everything

6
superfly 6 points ago +6 / -0

100%

5
qwertyuiop123 5 points ago +5 / -0

Yep... and exactly one year ago would have been almost exactly perfect.

69
deleted 69 points ago +69 / -0
26
Burto_87 26 points ago +26 / -0

Agree, if you take the deacriptives out, it reads more like it should be.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
1
Wefoundyouremails 1 point ago +1 / -0

On the 18th this author (more on that in a minute) predicted a slew of pardons which didn't happen. Article is written by Jonathan Swan, that guy Trump did that "disastrous" interview with, where we get that meme with him passing the paper, and the guy staring at it incredulously from.

ALWAYS CHECK YOUR AUTHORS. But overall, I don't disagree with your assessment.

49
deleted 49 points ago +49 / -0
11
DickTick 11 points ago +11 / -0

Stop! My dick can only get so hard....

3
iamherefortheluls 3 points ago +3 / -0

I that a position he can appoint without Senate approval?

3
0care 3 points ago +3 / -0

yes

1
DickTick 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yarp

3
sirtra 3 points ago +3 / -0

Im mixed on Sidney.. this is 100% legit i checked myself.. she made up the quote

https://mobile.twitter.com/KlasfeldReports/status/1336904862622224384

1
DickTick 1 point ago +1 / -0

Her career speaks for itself.... I imagine everyone makes mistakes when you're throwing together thousands of pages of lawsuits in a matter of days, because that's what our fucked up system requires you to go.....

She isn't some unknown lawyer or some newcomer to the game.... the lady is one of the most well-respected lawyers in the country amongst her colleagues....

1
sirtra 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm well aware she isnt a newcomer, also her "i never say something i cant prove is true" remark etc.

It's exactly these things as to why its so odd that there would be a fabricated quote in a court document she filed. It's out of character would you not agree?

Im also not anti-Sidney, i clearly stated i'm mixed.. she's done a lot of good, but things like this quote on face value damage not only her credibility but also provides ammunition to be used against her either in the courts or just public opinion.

Did you even look into what this quote is that i'm referencing?

It's not some typo or bad cut'n'paste from a different lawsuit - nothing even close to resembling it can be found by people with access to search law archives. It quite literally is made-up and stated to be from a lawsuit which isnt even really relevent to the argument being made.

Now there could be an explanation for this - maybe it was a staffer trying to set her up but still its not comforting if thats the situation, or maybe it was intentional to test if the judge was actually reading the filings before ruling or some elaborate plan to be forced infront of the bar - but since no explanation has been provided its not a good look at the moment.

There is even talk of her being formally disciplined over this so it's not something to just brush aside if you actually in good faith want her to succeed.

Not a doomer but i'm also not going to be some gulliable "trust the plan" person either.

Personally i'm for reliable and honest information, even if its unpleasant or damaging to the cause. It's far better to be aware of it than sticking your head in the sand and pretending it doesnt exist - thats exactly what the "Biden won" cult and MSM are doing and its a risky game as it makes them less prepared to deal with it should it be necessary to do so.

Its rather disappointing to see it happen on the Trump side - wouldnt you be more upset not knowing about this if news came out tomorrow that Sidney has been disbarred ... rather than being informed and knowing in advance?

31
Natrod25 31 points ago +31 / -0

This is a clear sighn that Trump is fed up with swamp rat creatures.It seems like Trump is ready to pull the triggers at any point and at this point any one standing in his way will be ignored! The republic is at stake and it seems like Trump is getting the point!

Remember guys, Trump ordered all government officials to leave on December 24 but the people listed on the Executive order of 2018 must stay in there positions? You think Trump ordered that for a reason?? Does Trump have an attack planned??

14
MAGAMAN300 14 points ago +14 / -0

Sounds like it to me. Which I'm 100% for because I don't care how the media or far left sees it. They can go to hell. Lets save our republic.

1
5
Natrod25 5 points ago +5 / -0

Noooo!!!! That doesn’t mean his not planning on it! Plus Trump understands how the fake media works, he doesn’t need martial law if he invokes the insurrection act!

Also, NEVER TELL YOUR ENEMY YOUR MOTIVES!!!!

2
sirtra 2 points ago +2 / -0

We are on the same page Fren.

For clarification because i think i've been misunderstood, the insurrection act is not an attack. It is defense.

It's a subtle difference but a difference nonetheless.

1
DickTick 1 point ago +1 / -0

Lmao.... You think just because he said the people saying he was going to declare martial law or fake news, so that means he has nothing planned and nothing's going to happen?....

Some of y'all blow my mind with the shit y'all come up with or the shit y'all correlate that has nothing to do with one another....

1
sirtra 1 point ago +1 / -0

I didnt say he doesnt have a plan, he does January 6th!

All i'm saying is that there is no truth to all these rumors of some secret coup and where he is going to invoke martial law and start rounding up the enemy like cattle, thats some "trust the plan" levels of naive.

When Trump tweets something like this you should pay attention!

1
Paradyme 1 point ago +1 / -0

Never tell the enemy your plan of attack. He indicated that when discussing ISIS. So it’s probably misdirection

1
sirtra 1 point ago +1 / -0

This aint some game and he certainly wouldnt use a tweet to signal to his enemies something along the lines of "bombing China = fake news" just so they let their guard down whilst he proceeds to then bomb China.

Not only would it be terrible in terms of the optics and his reputation but the strategy doesnt even make sense.

If you are going to misdirect the enemy you need to actually direct attention elsewhere.. not just say "i wont be doing that, promise".

If he truly was going to be going the martial law route he wouldnt mention it at all and let the rumors spread, keeping them guessing is far more powerful than tweeting a lie about your next move.

22
sustainable_saltmine 22 points ago +22 / -0

Well, this is far-leftist Axios, so of course they're going to over-dramatize this

2
Mrdarkshine 2 points ago +2 / -0

Right. We're actually getting opposite reports from patriots in Trump's circle that the traitors are swaying him.

2
SvixGale 2 points ago +2 / -0

Such as....?

1
Wenger 1 point ago +1 / -0

They made it sound awesome.

21
OpenSocietyCommie420 21 points ago +21 / -0

Cipollone is one of the treasonous advisors and he is the leaker to the NY times journalist Maggie Haberman who was able to do these fake news pieces saying Trump is pullin out military options during private oval office meetings. You can listen to Patrick Byrne's interview (he was actually in the meeting and specifically points out how these pieces of shit lie to both the president and the american people): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M21etw9jZIA

6
paradox123 6 points ago +7 / -1

Her oldest daughter is a producer for Laura Ingraham's show ....

13
deleted 13 points ago +13 / -0
11
MAGAMAN300 11 points ago +11 / -0

They know at some point President Trump will use the military. To correct one thing. President Trump has all the time in the world it's those who are against him who are running out of time because he is giving them once last chance to do the right thing and if not the military takes it from here.

10
ProphetBoi 10 points ago +10 / -0

Never has a piece designed to make the president look bad given me this much joy.

Yuge, if true.

2
Southern_Belle 2 points ago +2 / -0

I loved it!

Weak, beneath contempt.

Pretty much describes how I feel about those traitors, too.

8
SteakywithKetchup 8 points ago +8 / -0

Giuliani on Bannon war room just discredited this axios report. G says Trump as cool as those cucumbers he loves - and I believe Rudy over all of the fake news

7
Based_psychologist 7 points ago +8 / -1

Your “new reporting” is Axios?

7
svlem 7 points ago +7 / -0

Why is it so outrageous to only hire people that are loyal to you? I don't get it.

6
iamherefortheluls 6 points ago +6 / -0

media had nothing but good things to say about it when Obama replaced the entire government with his cronies

2
Basileus 2 points ago +3 / -1

Loyalists are good, yes-men are not. There is a distinction even if it is rarely appreciated by those in power (not saying this applies to Trump, but I've seen it often enough)

2
whippeat 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yeah. I wish we’d done it on day one.

We should have an attack dog AG who would actively go after our enemies like Lynch and Holder did for Obama. Not pathetic recusal Sessions or do-nothing Barr. Republicans are always so desperate to take the high road.

Rest assured, despite talk of healing, Biden’s AG will use the full force of federal government against conservatives.

1
Southern_Belle 1 point ago +1 / -0

Day One isn't here yet.

When we're done, the entire swamp will be swept away.

6
gamingthisandthat 6 points ago +6 / -0

This sounds literally like someone is about to have a panic attack at trump winning.

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
5
Lamech_Slade 5 points ago +5 / -0

At this point, if you're not in the use the military to arrest democrats and RINOs as traitors and hang them camp then you're weak, and below contempt....

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
6
wethepepe 6 points ago +6 / -0

i'd say i can definitely see him calling people out for being weak/losers/causing him problems right to their cuck faces

which is probably where their stories of "lashing out" originate from because people in government aren't supposed to have to work hard and someone telling them to cut the shit to their face is unheard of

3
iamherefortheluls 3 points ago +3 / -0

lashing out is a loaded phrase. Unless he literally bitch slapped an advisor in middle of a conversation

5
womp_squared 5 points ago +5 / -0

Axios = I don't believe any of it

However, if any of this is true. GOOD. Anyone who rolls over and bites the pillow without fighting is weak, disloyal, and stupid.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
3
deleted 3 points ago +4 / -1
2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
Basileus 1 point ago +3 / -2

Yeah, they are panicked the President of the United States is going to refuse to leave office peacefully and may ignite pockets of violence, or even worse. Possibly necessitating his removal, which will forever tarnish any legitimacy of the government in the eyes of many.

I've tried not to color the issue in good or bad terms, but it does seem to be a valid concern for the status quo

0
Bongshapiro 0 points ago +1 / -1

Yeah ok Maggie

4
VoterIDMatters 4 points ago +4 / -0

“We cannot stress enough”

What the fuck kind of rank propaganda is this bullshit?!

4
deleted 4 points ago +5 / -1
3
Morpheus75 3 points ago +3 / -0

Cos fraud, cant talk about that.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
0
Basileus 0 points ago +2 / -2

Who knows, the fraud was obviously much lower tech, such as vote by mail completed on behalf of someone else. No easy way to prove it. Dominion is a red herring

3
Forgotmyname 3 points ago +3 / -0

I never voted for a fucking cipollone.

3
BasedITGuy 3 points ago +3 / -0

Where did they find "some supporters of Cipollone?" Idk who tf that is, let alone someone who "supports" him

2
NutterButter 2 points ago +2 / -0

Seriously - what the fuck is wrong with auditing voting machines? Not one person has so far provided a decent answer.

2
Scroon 2 points ago +2 / -0

This is demoralization propaganda to make it look like Trump is standing on fractured ground. He is not. His position is quite solid, but he hasn't acted yet, which is freaking his enemies out.

It's also freaking us out, but can you imagine how bad it is for those in Trump's crosshairs?

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
CokeOrPepe 2 points ago +2 / -0

He needs to, Trump is the President. He has every right to put anyone he wants in.

2
JigglesV 2 points ago +2 / -0

Trump is just a man.

2
MAGAWookie 2 points ago +2 / -0

Trump tweeted out that martial law was fake news. All he tweets about is his poison vaccines. Show us that you are fighting and deploy the military! What else is he possibly waiting for?

2
bigmikesballsack 2 points ago +2 / -0

"Weak." "Stupid. "Egg him on." "Cannot stress enough." "Trying to stay away." Blast zone." "Military." Weak." "Beneath contempt." "Fed up." "Fringe loyalist."

The media is scared.

2
brutustyberius 2 points ago +3 / -1

This whole thing reeks of a disinformation campaign, including Byrne.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
MAGA_Master2 2 points ago +2 / -0

This sounds good. I don't see any of this as a bad thing. Remove GOP, insert American Party loyalist.

2
bigmikesballsack 2 points ago +2 / -0

Trump's telling the doomers to fuck off.

Kind of like us.

2
Hangemh1gh 2 points ago +2 / -0

Fringe reads as based af.

2
americanjerky 2 points ago +2 / -0

The media loves to say “trump is lashing out” when he disagrees with people.

2
NOTWOKE 2 points ago +2 / -0

OMG! Man who’s been defrauded is fighting to expose it! How controversial!

Axios. Liberal garbage for the drones who need their lies explained to them like children.

2
pepperedtrail 2 points ago +2 / -0

I love this. God bless Trump.

1
oldschoolkiwi 1 point ago +1 / -0

AXIOS the Bastion of honest reporting.

1
Patroklos_Maga 1 point ago +1 / -0

This is a war. In a war you surround yourself with trusted people, not doubters. Victory must be certain.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
The_banned 1 point ago +1 / -0

seeks comfort

REEEEEEEEEE THE NAZIS ARE WINNINGGG

Thats all I read.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
LoobintheToobin 1 point ago +1 / -0

Hahahahaha GOOD

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
MinneMAGA 1 point ago +1 / -0

Trump thinks everyone around him is weak, stupid, or disloyal

...Well he's not exactly wrong

1
DaayTerkErJerbs 1 point ago +1 / -0

Why would anyone keep disloyal people in their inner circle?

1
Trustheplan 1 point ago +1 / -0

What should be the best Christmas gift for POTUS and us?

1
Basileus 1 point ago +1 / -0

They are building a case to remove him before January 20. I believe if he doesn't publicly concede by January 6, he may be gone. Yes, that January 6.