I'm well aware she isnt a newcomer, also her "i never say something i cant prove is true" remark etc.
It's exactly these things as to why its so odd that there would be a fabricated quote in a court document she filed. It's out of character would you not agree?
Im also not anti-Sidney, i clearly stated i'm mixed.. she's done a lot of good, but things like this quote on face value damage not only her credibility but also provides ammunition to be used against her either in the courts or just public opinion.
Did you even look into what this quote is that i'm referencing?
It's not some typo or bad cut'n'paste from a different lawsuit - nothing even close to resembling it can be found by people with access to search law archives. It quite literally is made-up and stated to be from a lawsuit which isnt even really relevent to the argument being made.
Now there could be an explanation for this - maybe it was a staffer trying to set her up but still its not comforting if thats the situation, or maybe it was intentional to test if the judge was actually reading the filings before ruling or some elaborate plan to be forced infront of the bar - but since no explanation has been provided its not a good look at the moment.
There is even talk of her being formally disciplined over this so it's not something to just brush aside if you actually in good faith want her to succeed.
Not a doomer but i'm also not going to be some gulliable "trust the plan" person either.
Personally i'm for reliable and honest information, even if its unpleasant or damaging to the cause. It's far better to be aware of it than sticking your head in the sand and pretending it doesnt exist - thats exactly what the "Biden won" cult and MSM are doing and its a risky game as it makes them less prepared to deal with it should it be necessary to do so.
Its rather disappointing to see it happen on the Trump side - wouldnt you be more upset not knowing about this if news came out tomorrow that Sidney has been disbarred ... rather than being informed and knowing in advance?
I'm well aware she isnt a newcomer, also her "i never say something i cant prove is true" remark etc.
It's exactly these things as to why its so odd that there would be a fabricated quote in a court document she filed. It's out of character would you not agree?
Im also not anti-Sidney, i clearly stated i'm mixed.. she's done a lot of good, but things like this quote on face value damage not only her credibility but also provides ammunition to be used against her either in the courts or just public opinion.
Did you even look into what this quote is that i'm referencing?
It's not some typo or bad cut'n'paste from a different lawsuit - nothing even close to resembling it can be found by people with access to search law archives. It quite literally is made-up and stated to be from a lawsuit which isnt even really relevent to the argument being made.
Now there could be an explanation for this - maybe it was a staffer trying to set her up but still its not comforting if thats the situation, or maybe it was intentional to test if the judge was actually reading the filings before ruling or some elaborate plan to be forced infront of the bar - but since no explanation has been provided its not a good look at the moment.
There is even talk of her being formally disciplined over this so it's not something to just brush aside if you actually in good faith want her to succeed.
Not a doomer but i'm also not going to be some gulliable "trust the plan" person either.
Personally i'm for reliable and honest information, even if its unpleasant or damaging to the cause. It's far better to be aware of it than sticking your head in the sand and pretending it doesnt exist - thats exactly what the "Biden won" cult and MSM are doing and its a risky game as it makes them less prepared to deal with it should it be necessary to do so.
Its rather disappointing to see it happen on the Trump side - wouldnt you be more upset not knowing about this if news came out tomorrow that Sidney has been disbarred ... rather than being informed and knowing in advance?