3428
Comments (145)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
-2
Lapstrake -2 points ago +3 / -5

Ok, so you are a Byrne expert I will ask you again.

This time, can you please answer them instead of attacking me for asking the questions?

  • Why does everybody instantly believe Patrick Byrne?

  • Why was he in the oval office? Who invited him?

  • Does he have some official position that I'm unaware of?

I am not anti-Byrne. I'm not trying to make a political point. I was asking for information because I am genuinely confused about this guy that just popped up on the scene.

9
tw1stynipple 9 points ago +9 / -0

A) Patrick has advised he has been funding a group of white-hat hackers and ex military intelligence, who were already researching the fraud since 2018, they have been supplying a lot of intelligence regarding the fraud to all legal teams pursuing cases. This has not been refuted.

B) He has been a vocal supporter of Trump since day 1 (regarding election fraud- otherwise he is a small l liberal/libertarian and has never voted democrat or republican), and has called the fraud out, and if his story is correct (yet to be refuted by anyone from either side) - he has been fucked by the deep-state and is trying to get back on them

C) He is in the oval office for that reason, he has been staying at Trump hotel in the battleground states and giving interviews to any who will listen, he also spoke at the last Rally last Saturday and gave a stirring speech in Trumps support and against the election fraud.

D) He doesn't have any official position that you need to be aware of. In fact, he was calling out government officials who are rusted on, the fact he is a third party is helpful. If you read his story, he was used as a pawn in deep-state maneuvers.

E) For all the above, he has been working with Trump team. It also goes into a lot more detail on his website deepcapture.com, and he also talks about the work he has done to help extensively in interviews. Which are hard to find due to censorship.

F) While he has only recently come into focus for many pedes, he has been talking about this for a few months now, so I understand you might think he has come out of no where, but he has a lot of skin in this fight. And unlike the deep-state rhinos, cucks and traitors, he has done nothing yet to make me question him whatsoever.

Edit: he is also a very intelligent billioniare with a doctorate in Philosophy and economics from Stanford, and a mentee of Milton Friedman in 2005 he began a campaign against corruption in the capital markets through securities manipulation and that's all those wall street big bank scum went to jail in 2008 (he provided information that led to 200 of them going to jail)

2
Bongshapiro 2 points ago +3 / -1

He's spent half-a-mil of his own money to provide Sidney with a huge amount of her technical claims of fraud.

1
Lapstrake 1 point ago +2 / -1

OK

Thank you very much!

I did not know any of these things.

I had read a very brief description of his statements about being used by the deep state, but I had no idea about his speech, or that he was a big time Trump supporter.

3
tw1stynipple 3 points ago +3 / -0

sorry that's just why I got upset, its very obvious from what I've seen so far (at this point i don't really trust anyone after all the betrayal) that he is on our side and he has been fighting hard for us. He is a true liberal/libertarian who wants freedom and dislikes socialism/communism/fascism. To me, Patrick is on of the few intellectuals who we have on our side who is fighting for us.

3
VoteCyborgTrump2040 3 points ago +3 / -0

People don't instantly believe him. Lots of people are skeptical, whether pessimistically or optimistically.

Nobody knows. But I don't see it being denied by anyone. So if it's bullshit, sounds like there's a strategic reason not to call it out as such at the moment.

No. He has made claims about being involved with FBI and setting up Hillary Clinton, but nobody knows whether it's true. Nobody seems to be denying it though. But nobody knows why he's there or what he might be up to, if he is there.

It does seem odd that he would say all this stuff and not be called out if it was all bullshit though. I would expect someone from the Trump team to call him out if he was just out there making shit up all the time.