Comments (10)
sorted by:
3
Ogcarvattack 3 points ago +3 / -0

look at that pedophile hastert. that fat fucking piece of shit FAGGOT!

3
NuclearRocks1 3 points ago +3 / -0

Are you saying, each state objection requires a different senator ?

Seems finding one is hard enough. Five is a pipe dream 🤬

2
MAGA_____bitches [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

I believe Senators Paul and Tuberville are already on board

2
NuclearRocks1 2 points ago +2 / -0

Only mights & maybes

3
MemeWarsVet 3 points ago +3 / -0

Believe we need just one to get the ball rolling.

2
magabirdlady 2 points ago +2 / -0

Thanks for reminding me of this. Typical loudmouths that day. Many are gone but Waters. I have to give to Gore he seemed to be a stand up guy that day. That must of been hard for him. But I was so glad he did not win the Florida recount.

2
Ogcarvattack 2 points ago +2 / -0

just need one rep and one senator.

3
sustainable_saltmine 3 points ago +3 / -0

yes, and then it goes to debate for 2 hrs to decide on House vote, it's not an automatic "House votes, 1 vote per state, Trump has majority, Trump wins". We can still get royally fucked in that vote after the 2hr debate is up and never get to the "House contingency vote"

0
Anaconda 0 points ago +4 / -4

Don't count on it. They do simple majority votes in the house and senate. Look what they did to Barbara Boxer.

With only senators the vote will laughably be a 99-5 vote by senators and 335-100 vote by House representatives

https://www.eastbaytimes.com/2005/01/07/boxer-takes-symbolic-stand-on-ohio-vote/

2
sustainable_saltmine 2 points ago +2 / -0

99-5? oh right we are playing by democrat rules. They will "find" extra "senators" to vote, just like they "found extra ballots"