What reals? According to these BS articles all the "real" evidence was destroyed. Slapping in random pics of unrelated sideshow attractions and photoshops only hurts their credibility.
Doubt what? These articles themselves are either satire or poorly fabricated clickbait. They don't even count as a claim of anything as far as I'm concerned, let alone "evidence". They aren't even taking themselves seriously. Let me see something that isn't obvious bullshit, and the NYT snippet they cannibalized doesn't actually make such outlandish claims. It rises to barely above a rumor a far as the actual information it contains.
I believe some stock photos are fakes. People have been creating fakes to discredit the reals.
What reals? According to these BS articles all the "real" evidence was destroyed. Slapping in random pics of unrelated sideshow attractions and photoshops only hurts their credibility.
But you don't dispute evidence of giant rabbits, elephants, lizards, etc. It's only humans you doubt. Why?
Doubt what? These articles themselves are either satire or poorly fabricated clickbait. They don't even count as a claim of anything as far as I'm concerned, let alone "evidence". They aren't even taking themselves seriously. Let me see something that isn't obvious bullshit, and the NYT snippet they cannibalized doesn't actually make such outlandish claims. It rises to barely above a rumor a far as the actual information it contains.
You sound like a serious scholar. You don't seek evidence yourself, but wait to receive it only to dismiss it. You have a bright future. Good luck