799
posted ago by xdrunkagainx +801 / -2

Either we sink to their level and even below or we will die. Guilt and morals have been weaponized against us.

Either we sink to their level and even below or we will die. Guilt and morals have been weaponized against us.
Comments (80)
sorted by:
26
WopNine17plus1 26 points ago +27 / -1

History has proven the only thing you can do with communists is kill them like the disease they are.

6
deleted 6 points ago +8 / -2
3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
23
Londonrain 23 points ago +24 / -1

agreed, you cannot play by the rules against those who do not. It is going to get us slaughtered. Not one of these mother fuckers has had to deal with the repercussions of their actions. Look at Antifa and BLM for instance. NOT FUCKING ONE.

8
BasedBoneSaw 8 points ago +8 / -0

This should have been made clear to everyone when SCOTUS wiped their ass with the constitution. That was the day I knew we were heading toward conflict.

4
OakCliff 4 points ago +4 / -0

This. That day the shit on equal protection... I knew it is just a matter of time before violent conflict breaks out. Not if... but when. States either succeed or shit starts popping off.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
BasedBoneSaw 2 points ago +2 / -0

That is all they ever do.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
-2
deleted -2 points ago +3 / -5
18
GrizzlyHash 18 points ago +19 / -1

The Crusades and 1776 happened for a reason.

16
Shaffro 16 points ago +17 / -1

Fight fire with fire. Works every time.

-4
Anon6992374 -4 points ago +1 / -5

Said no firefighter ever.

5
NoStumpyTrumpy 5 points ago +5 / -0

Have you never heard of a controlled burn? You can literally use fire to create a barrier to block fire.

4
spezisthedevil 4 points ago +4 / -0

Dynamite to stop oil well fires is another example.

0
Anon6992374 0 points ago +1 / -1

That’s a bit of an intellectual hurdle there, but ok.

2
deleted 2 points ago +3 / -1
2
Dialectic 2 points ago +3 / -1

Um, ever heard the phrase "Kill it with fire!" ?? Science.

-1
Anon6992374 -1 points ago +2 / -3

Yes. But I’ve never heard the phrase, “we need to stop this fire from burning down the whole city — quick, go get some more fire!”

9
BasedCostanza91 9 points ago +10 / -1

Hey they’ve set the terms. Violence works, voting doesn’t. If that’s what they want, we can play by their rules.

2
OakCliff 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yep, we will have some mostly peaceful shootouts and public hangings.

8
Isthisreallife2016 8 points ago +8 / -0

The redcoats thought guerilla warfare was not an honorable method to fight. Worked out great for them.

6
deleted 6 points ago +8 / -2
5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
5
ShinAkuma 5 points ago +6 / -1

Yup.

Can't win the game if you aren't playing by the same rules.

We need to start playing dirty.

5
Legionnaire0311 5 points ago +6 / -1

I couldn't agree more. We've been trained by movies and TV that the bad guy always gets got in the end, almost by fate, without the good guy having to get his hands dirty. We've been trained that allowing the bad guy to walk is the moral thing to do, that doing so makes us the bigger men. We will be taking these principles to our graves and damning future generations to hell on earth if we don't get our priorities straight. Save the country by any means, or lose everything to globalism. That's it.

4
RoughWaters 4 points ago +4 / -0

I have no hate for useful idiots in Antifa and BLM. They are merely gullible pawns being used and thrown away at the earliest convenience. It's the politicians and elites that pull their strings and betray the country and the citizens interests that this country can't suffer if it wishes to survive. Sadly, there appears to be less than a dozen now in the cesspool known as DC that actually give the smallest damn about this country and the people in it.

4
Mooma 4 points ago +5 / -1

If you still believe that we can defeat the left by being morally superior to them - your name is Bill Barr and you should GTFOH

4
silentnoobxd 4 points ago +6 / -2

This was pushed on the right to make us weak, no fun, and unlikable.

4
NoMoreMao 4 points ago +6 / -2

If that were the case then we could have just told Hitler, Tojo and Mussolini to settle down and quit their shenanigans without all the bloodshed.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
2
Madhax47 2 points ago +3 / -1

It's wish thinking this would work. Antifa tactics work. That's why they use it. All the traitors just take the easy rout. They need to learn to fear the people again.

2
unique_string 2 points ago +4 / -2

Now that we've seen all the evidence of election fraud, all we need to do is wait for the deepstate to arrest itself and put itself in jail forever.

2
deleted 2 points ago +4 / -2
2
GingerMinky 2 points ago +4 / -2

Play by the rules your opponent plays by. That's it. not that hard to get...

8
Isthisreallife2016 8 points ago +9 / -1

No make up your own rules that favor your cause

1
Summonblood 1 point ago +2 / -1

We can’t defeat the far left with “morals”, but we can drain them of their center-left liberals by offering the liberals freedom. Freedom to criticize. Freedom to think differently. Freedom to reclaim your individuality. Freedom to make your own choices.

We don’t need to brow beat them, because the left already brow beats them. What we need to do is offer them something the left will never give them - freedom to criticize without censorship. Freedom to speak their mind without fear.

I live in SF & grew up in the Bay Area. I know these people. Most of them are not communists. They are tech yuppies who think they’re smarter than everyone else. But they don’t realize that once republicans are gone, they will become the new enemy of the left.

The left offers them no carrots other than “morality”. We need to offer them carrots that let them continue to be arrogant. Don’t fight their nature, use it against them.

1
Sexual_Assault_Rifle 1 point ago +2 / -1

I'm so blackpilled I wondering if the Right can beat the Far Right in a civil war situation. The left doesn't matter as soon as the fighting starts. Eventually, it will be patriots against Nazis again if it comes down to it here...

0
xdrunkagainx [S] 0 points ago +2 / -2

The Right's leadership are all puppets of the left. The Far Right needs to identify itself and break away ASAP to a new party.

1
Tseliteiv 1 point ago +7 / -6

This is wrong. The only way you can defeat the left is with being morally superior to them. The left are the immoral people. The left wants everyone to believe morality is subjective and that morality simply changes to suit their whim. You are a moral person only if you bow down to the will of the collective and the collective sense of morality shifts as needed to benefit itself. They claim moral superiority without actually being moral people themselves.

The trick is that you cannot try to act morally superior within the confines of the moral structure they created because it's designed so that they always win. Don't play their game on their field.

There is nothing moral in holding a gun to a person's head and saying you must allocate the benefits of your labour toward the people I tell you to and if you don't do it, you'll go to prison. Also you should want to allocate the benefits of your labour toward the people I want you to even if that's against your interests not because I'm holding the gun to your head but because if you don't you're a bad person. That is what the left stands for and it is inherently immoral. If you try for one moment to justify how you're actually a good person because even though you want lower taxes you still care about others, you've played right into their hand. You're a good person because you don't believe in holding a gun to a person's head and forcing them tor redistribute the value of their labour toward a cause that someone else dictates. That's it. Don't engage them further. Their entire political ideology is founded in immorality.

4
Tenet 4 points ago +5 / -1

Our side needs a good series of videos explaining the nuances of what Morality entails when used outside the context of the Bible and Judeo-Christian faith.

They have this false belief that Morality is Passivity, that acting ahead of the enemy and striking down threats is somehow immoral. That's a product of bad education, not "morality".

Even the Non-Aggression Principle is not about pacifism - the left initiates violence by supporting slavery and slavery-increasing policies. That can be fought against directly with no shame or immorality.

1
Tseliteiv 1 point ago +1 / -0

I disagree with your first sentence. What we need to do is unwind the liberal masonic humanist communist gaslighting of the judeo-christian faith, specifically Christianity.

This ties into your second point. Christianity is NOT a passive religion and the only context of the bible one even gets that from is one of the most misunderstood part which is where Jesus instructs people how to be a martyr like him. A situational strategy for when the salt has left the earth. AKA when there is no other path left because opposition is futile. Barring those dire circumstances, Christianity is an active religion with a morality that views the left as abominations who must be struct down by the righteous.

The NAP is a cuck belief and basically useless anyway because anyone can justify anything is an act of aggression as you just did. The NAP is what people who've been brainwashed their whole life into thinking violence is somehow bad come up with to try and justify the moral position in their ideology while using leftist based morality. God did not show mercy to those who opposed his laws and the people who act immoral in our society must be actively opposed be virtuous men.

Christianity was not always so cucked. That was due to a systematic destruction of the religion from within by the liberal sect of the church. The concept of Christianity that most people here grew up thinking represented Christianity is not Christianity at all. Modern Catholicism is not Christianity. Most protestant denominations these days is not Christianity.

“Though the children of this world be wiser than the children of light, their snares and their violence would undoubtedly have less success if a great number of those who call themselves Catholics did not extend a friendly hand to them. Yes, unfortunately, there are those who seem to want to walk in agreement with our enemies and try to build an alliance between light and darkness, an accord between justice and iniquity, by means of those so-called liberal Catholic doctrines, which, based on the most pernicious principles, adulate the civil power when it invades things spiritual and urge souls to respect or at least tolerate the most iniquitous laws, as if it had not been written absolutely that no one can serve two masters. They are certainly much more dangerous and more baneful than our declared enemies, not only because they second their efforts, perhaps without realizing it, but also because, by maintaining themselves at the very edge of condemned opinions, they take on an appearance of integrity and irreprehensible doctrine, beguiling the imprudent friends of conciliations and deceiving honest persons, who would revolt against a declared error. In this way they divide the minds, rend the unity, and weaken the forces that should be assembled against the enemy.” Blessed Pope Pius IX, letter to the president and members of the Saint Ambrose Circle of Milan, March 6, 1873, in I Papi e la Gioventu (Rome: Editrice A.V.E., 1944).

There should be no tolerance for the immoral left.

1
Tenet 1 point ago +1 / -0

The NAP is one of the most misunderstood concepts around, just like that Jesus reference.

anyway because anyone can justify anything is an act of aggression as you just did.

They can try, and they would be objectively wrong. The only axiom is the possession of your own soul, and the ownership of all products of one's actions. Aggression is where this fundamental is threatened.


  1. The soul is our fundamental claim, and it provides the claim for one's body.
  2. The product of the action of the soul/body are strong claims, as anyone who contest them would contest our ability to use our own body. Homesteading is based on this principle.

These two are the strongest claims, and any violation of them is an aggressive / immoral act that threatens our enslavement.

A strong property claim can be understood as a historical record of our homesteading activity: the mixing of our labor with land and resource. Contesting such claims by theft is equivalent to enslavement. (Communism = Slavery)

A weak property claim can be understood as the picking of resources from the commons in a manner that did not require significant effort - like planting signs around an unclaimed land. This can require compromise if there are multiple claimants, and could be contested. I like to call this the Discovery claim.

Without understanding the above the concept of "Aggression" becomes incoherent. This is why it is so often misunderstood and misused.

1
Anon6992374 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ignore the hate. Those ignorant to what morality is will never understand.

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
2
Tseliteiv 2 points ago +2 / -0

I mean, a warlord might rape and kill many people and while hanging out with his buddies banging some concubines from his harem he might say the way the world works in whoever has the most power chooses the rules and in that moment what he said may be accurate but it doesn't make what he's doing morally right.

-3
deleted -3 points ago +1 / -4
1
BigDaddyT 1 point ago +1 / -0

I heard if you take all the pills at once it turns you gay.

1
Tenet 1 point ago +2 / -1

The left is immoral, we just have to be morally consistent.

Moral consistency is not weakness or pacifism. Action can be justified when under threat.

1
Negativekarmabait 1 point ago +1 / -0

Alinsky is worth a read. Also, study breitbart.

1
DickPils 1 point ago +2 / -1

I start by getting into fights with libs I know. Fuck em. You're getting the red pill suppository with me or you're a commie-sympathizing retarded sell out and I want nothing to do with you.

1
iitwi 1 point ago +1 / -0

agreed. It's just hard to discard morals with the reckless abandon they have. Then again, commies aren't real people.

0
The_Don_Wonton 0 points ago +2 / -2

Machiavelli explained it best. I forget what he said tho, lol. Basically you can't beat psychopaths without taking plays from their own book. Almost time to fight fire with fire.

0
remember1776 0 points ago +1 / -1

We have to come to the realization that *certain things*, often unpalatable things, need to be done in order to maintain the Republic.

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
0
stokinz 0 points ago +4 / -4

I disagree. The world is watching the most armed populous on the face of this planet defer to a superior document: the Constitution. We are teaching everyone how to win with diplomacy and peace. We are better than violent overthrow, we are America!

2
Anon6992374 2 points ago +2 / -0

Truth is rarely a popular opinion, and virtue is despised by the ignorant.

1
stokinz 1 point ago +2 / -1

Thank you!

0
deleted 0 points ago +2 / -2
0
xdrunkagainx [S] 0 points ago +2 / -2

Sent you for deportation faggot. You forgot to log out and sign back in with you ALT

1
deleted 1 point ago +2 / -1
0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
1
deleted 1 point ago +2 / -1
2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
0
tiredofwinning2020 0 points ago +1 / -1

I don’t understand why GEOTUS and his team are still “playing by those rules”???

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
0
Scooby721 0 points ago +1 / -1

I'm ready to get down and dirty.

-1
lordvon -1 points ago +2 / -3

ok what does that mean. specifics are needed for action.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
-1
unique_string -1 points ago +1 / -2

Now that we've seen all the evidence of election fraud, all we need to do is wait for the deepstate to arrest itself and put itself in jail forever.

-1
Lbeas300 -1 points ago +6 / -7

What if there is a plan in place that has been in the works for years. What if he is waiting for them to show their Trump card right after they do. This is 4D chess. There are bread crumbs out there to follow. Trump is not an idiot. He is shrewd and he lives and cares about this country way too much to see it collapse. Stay the course

9
Isthisreallife2016 9 points ago +10 / -1

If your statement starts with what if, that's the fantasy this guy is talking about.

4
TrumpTrainChoooChoo2 4 points ago +5 / -1

What if you’re wrong and we need to step up? Guess you’re willing to see Biden inaugurated for that huh?

2
DeepDMingDeep 2 points ago +4 / -2

He called us there on the 6th. Why do you think he did that?

-6
Lapstrake -6 points ago +6 / -12

No.

I assume that because you are posting on TheDonald.win that you actually admire and support our President.

He is an example of winning while doing everything by the book.

It is the RINOs who make a big show of trying to win but failing because they are too weak. They are just pretending to fight. They are in league with the enemy.

That has been our problem, not that we are too moral.

If we had cheated during the election, we would be the same boat now, except nobody would care even a tiny bit that we didn't do as well at cheating as they did.

By being the good guys we can win this, because we didn't cheat, and they did. Massively.

Trump beat the Mueller probe. Mueller ended up proving Trump innocence rather than proving guilt. We beat them by being honest and crime-free.

This does not extend to being friendly and doing favors for the Dems and RINOs. No more of that. If we have the power to seat a new SC Justice, then we are going to do it.

-1
Anon6992374 -1 points ago +2 / -3

Thank you for offering some sanity amidst the insanity that is this thread.

-1
Lapstrake -1 points ago +2 / -3

Yes, things are getting pretty spicy as the situation heats up.

-3
Tartarian-Kingz -3 points ago +4 / -7

Low T comment of the day

-1
Lapstrake -1 points ago +2 / -3

Not an argument.

Yours was the Low IQ reply of the day.

0
Tartarian-Kingz 0 points ago +3 / -3

Sure bud 🤙