1286
Comments (120)
sorted by:
47
SlowButterfly 47 points ago +47 / -0

NTD needs some love too. They've been spot on.

27
bingbongdingdong 27 points ago +27 / -0

NTD is affiliated with Falun Gong, which is some sort of Chinese dissident/religious organization, and they have basically been exiled from China by the CCP, but as I understand it this is a conflict which actually goes back to ancient royal drama in China.

So that is to say, NTD has one primary agenda: it is against the CCP. This aligns with our interests for now, but do not count on it forever.

7
Buce-Nudo 7 points ago +7 / -0

That's how I took Newsmax. It had the right approach for a while but only while it needed to.

Edit: I'm still surprised at how quickly it changed it's tune after the election. I was expecting more from them for a couple months at least.

7
bingbongdingdong 7 points ago +7 / -0

I knew it right away... just a few days after the election, they had like a 15 minute interview with their own CEO, where all he could talk about was how great newsmax's ratings were, and how proud he was that the president happened to mention their network, and how it was going to affect their revenue so positively. And then he kept using phrases like "even though biden won the election" and "if trump gives his concession soon" etc... Made it very clear that he only cared about revenue, and was not actually pro-trump even a little.

1
Southasiangir1 1 point ago +3 / -2

Thanks Pede. Very informative. +1

20
ShinAkuma 20 points ago +20 / -0

NTD is solid.

20
asdf1234567 20 points ago +20 / -0

How about The Epoch Times?

9
yudsfpbc 9 points ago +9 / -0

Paid for a subscription!

8
ShinAkuma 8 points ago +8 / -0

NTD owns the Epoch Times.

4
AOCs_tits_4ever 4 points ago +4 / -0

I like Epoch Times, paid for a sub too. It's so completely straightforward and reasonable, it's almost boring, which is kind of reassuring these days.

Also, since I subscribed, I am not constantly bombarded by Tommy Chong CBD ads, ads featuring graphic pictures of earwax, ads about erectile dysfunction, or "Car Insurance" ads that for some reason feature pictures of big-breasted women in their 40s. Although I kinda don't mind those.

4
HalfKing 4 points ago +4 / -0

I get their paper every week!

1
Flipbarryfromreddit 1 point ago +1 / -0

Who?

35
deleted 35 points ago +35 / -0
7
asdf1234567 7 points ago +7 / -0

NTD?

22
SkippyDaMagnificent 22 points ago +22 / -0

Simple.. newsmax has a free app anyone with a roku tv or firestock can get.

You need an active subscription to a cable service to get oann

5
SaltyKrakenBalls 5 points ago +5 / -0

Klowdtv has it free for the rest of the year. FREE INFOWARS TOO...

4
SkippyDaMagnificent 4 points ago +4 / -0

Rest of the year? So like 9 days free.. how much after that?

3
Jimmy_Snuka 3 points ago +3 / -0

Real America’s Voice has a free app,

3
Spez_Isacuck 3 points ago +3 / -0

You don't hve to have an active cable subscription. But it's $4.99/month through their various apps.

I pay for it and don't have cable.

16
shaven_llama 16 points ago +16 / -0

I lasted about a week on Newsmax before switching to OANN.

13
nakklavaar 13 points ago +17 / -4

I love OAN (really just Chanel) but they said they turned in evidence to the police that Hunter was fucking his niece. Nothing happened. Better to not treat news networks like fan clubs.

9
Southasiangir1 9 points ago +10 / -1

Nothing happened because... maybe they didnt do anything with the evidence. Like the FBI did last year to screw with Trump, while he was being impeached... with the whole fucking laptop, huh?

-4
nakklavaar -4 points ago +4 / -8

They gave it to the police in Delaware. I can’t imagine the police not taking allegations of pedophilia seriously.

8
MakeALaskaGreatAgain 8 points ago +8 / -0

happens all the time. Many police would be scared to challenge a Biden right now. At least there is some merit to it joe would gladly use the intel apparatus to destroy them.

4
DickPils 4 points ago +4 / -0

I see it more as the pyramid, compartmentalized knowledge model where you only need to have blocks in the right positions at the right level of the hierarchy to snuff things.

You don't know what your boss knows, if he tells you to do X you're likely to believe and/or do it. Enlisted soldiers don't know what the officers know. Same thing here as far as I see it.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
1
nakklavaar 1 point ago +1 / -0

True but we’re talking about in Delaware. The state in itself is pretty irrelevant.

3
Spez_Isacuck 3 points ago +3 / -0

Your imagination sucks.

2
lukeskywalker 2 points ago +2 / -0

Lol

7
Spez_Isacuck 7 points ago +7 / -0

So it's OANN's fault that Hunter Biden is protected by "law enforcement?"

How fuckiing retarded are you, precicely? Like on a scale of 1-derp?

-4
deleted -4 points ago +1 / -5
7
Spez_Isacuck 7 points ago +7 / -0

I don't have to believe OAN. I saw the evidence. As most of us did. Shill elsewhere.

-6
nakklavaar -6 points ago +1 / -7

No you didn’t, but keep running with that. I’m sure you come off as a scholar IRL.

3
Spez_Isacuck 3 points ago +4 / -1

When I'm not coming on your mom.

-3
nakklavaar -3 points ago +1 / -4

Nice

1
CA-Patriot 1 point ago +1 / -0

Seriously, you didnt see all of the photos of Hunter?

1
nakklavaar 1 point ago +1 / -0

I saw a whole lotta genitals and hoes but no pedophilia.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
-1
deleted -1 points ago +1 / -2
9
4Mitchell4 9 points ago +9 / -0

I kept saying - stay off Newsmax!!!!!!!

8
RONIN808 8 points ago +8 / -0

EXACTLY, newsmax hype is sus as fuck - OAN, epoch times, NTD all WAY better, hell crossroads with josh Philip runs circles around newsmax all by himself.

1
torr071 1 point ago +1 / -0

but Joshua, though I like his reporting, takes more pics of himself in his articles than Chanel Rion is forced to take, and I want to see Chanel Rion! they both good, but the Joshua getting in every picture is severely disturbing. where if Chanel was just standing there in front of the camera we would watch, though she would never let it happen, we have tried!

7
WishdoctorsSong 7 points ago +7 / -0

I don't think this was some giant conspiracy, it was easier to get your Grandparents access to Newsmax than OANN. And immediately post-election they were doing great coverage even with all the red flags. Turns out they decided to stab us in the back again far faster than anybody was expecting.

6
CovfefeNegro 6 points ago +6 / -0

I have a hard time getting OAN, would love the option.

Newsmax is 'slight'y' better than FOX from my perspective, much less suitable than OAN.

Look around tho, everyone is turning out against us these days, just a handful of Repubs voted against the damn stimulus giveaway. We may still have Trump with us but other than that, we may be IT.

Really need Jesus to come back soon, otherwise there is gonna be real trouble.

https://kekpe.pe/i/5fe27413a64fc.jpg

1
CA-Patriot 1 point ago +1 / -0

You have plenty of options to watch OAN. If you want to watch on your PC, use klowdtv.com . If you want to watch on your TV, get a set top box either from ROKU (available at Amazon) or buy one from klowdtv.com, it even comes with a year of OAN!

1
CovfefeNegro 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah, sure, go buy this or that and then subscribe. No thanks, they don't offer anything I want except OAN.

We are at that point where it no longer matters, really. If POTUS pulls the trigger on the Insurrection Act and we clean up the corruptions then we'll sort out broadcast and cable services, if POTUS fails then we devolve quickly into unCivil War and troubles too numerous to name.

I don't need them now, coulda used them the last few years but don't need them now. It is all up to POTUS now, we have the evidences, we have the proofs, we have archived this and that and simply do not need the services of a news group to inform us.

Is OAN gonna tell me biden is a pedo...? Already known. Gonna tell me obama is a traitor, hillary a traitor, Pelosi a traitor...? Already known. Are they gonna tell me the stimulus is wealth redistribution designed to weaken/destroy America...? Already known.

Read the licensing agreements and explain to me how/why any of that is worth it.

https://kekpe.pe/i/5fe35082943c4.jpg

1
Spez_Isacuck 1 point ago +1 / -0

What's hard about downloading their app and subscribing for $4.99/month?

0
CovfefeNegro 0 points ago +1 / -1

Have you read the terms of service and license agreement on the App? If you have not then save me the snark.

One version of their App refuses to even list their privacy policies, you have to go dig them out for Apple.

Another ties in with XBOX policies, yet they all claim they WILL use all the data you offer up, with little or no explanation as to what they are taking and how they are using it.

They need to get on air without licensing apps if they want viewers.

I'll hit them up some when I'm online but it's difficult to find particular news stories that way.

https://kekpe.pe/i/5fe35082943c4.jpg

6
Modern_Times 6 points ago +6 / -0

As far as I know OANN is not free. Pluto has OANN encore and a few other conservative channels aside from Newsmax.

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
7
bigbossman2 7 points ago +7 / -0

i switched back to DirecTV after moving just to get OANN back.

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
5
silentnoobxd 5 points ago +5 / -0

Then don't watch commiecast. Broadcast TV is an intellectually lazy medium to begin with.

2
Spez_Isacuck 2 points ago +2 / -0

Cancel your cable and download the OANN app for $4.99/month. Cheaper.

1
torr071 1 point ago +1 / -0

screw that, just use internet and go to their site, same news and print version free. havent paid for cable in almost 3 decades, absolutely no reason to. i pay for internet.

1
torr071 1 point ago +1 / -0

just do OANN on internet, go to site..and walla, news. no charge, it be amazing. unlike epoch times, who think they are the NYT and should charge you for visitng their site. You can find NTD and Epoch for free on Odysee though, but dont do it over phone as it messes with your phone data very badly. Bit Chute carries Info Wars -Alex Jones, Salty (turned religious zealot - sad), Tim Pool (i know i wanna slap him too at times, just to knock him on one side of the fence), and Midwestly (though YT has him skeered, he dont do election stuff). only place to find Chanel Rion is on OANN website, cuz i aint ever goin to youtube again, they get no traffic from me, and i dont use google nor chrome either any longer.

5
Friar_Pede 5 points ago +5 / -0

I was told by some shill because OANN has bad 'production value'

5
Spez_Isacuck 5 points ago +5 / -0

They do have bad production value. Bad lighting and mediocre sound. But it's actual news, not a fucking feature film.

2
torr071 2 points ago +2 / -0

that shill was prolly gay, Chanel makes bad production look like Cybil Shepard on Moonlighting when she on air. Yes yes, she very smart too, its bonus.

4
AceOfTrumps 4 points ago +4 / -0

Because Trump tweeted for people to check out Newsmax and OANN during the Fox fiasco

4
giggitybooped 4 points ago +4 / -0

"So long as they claim to Republican, they're ok by me!"

3
NotdaMomma 3 points ago +3 / -0

OANN is what I watch, but dayumm it is slow, repetitive and downright boring. The stories start re-playing after 20 mins and the announcers sound like they are in tranquilizers! They have got to kick it up a notch!

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
2
Tookens 2 points ago +2 / -0

Comcast/XFinity carries Newsmax. They don't carry OANN. At least in my area.

1
Jimmy_Snuka 1 point ago +1 / -0

PlutoTv has OANN Encore, free

2
Tookens 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yeah I do catch that from time to time. I basically don't watch much television news these days though. There are better sources of information.

2
Covfefe_Crusader 2 points ago +2 / -0

For the same reason that parler is being promoted instead of GAB.

2
NoMoreMao 2 points ago +3 / -1

I've always like OANN better but their programming leaves a lot to be desired. Plus in most cases you have to pay to view their channel as it's not just part of base media packages.

2
ironhorse 2 points ago +2 / -0

Who do you think was pushing NewsMax? Connect the dots....The Clinton shills are here. They followed us when we left reddit.

2
Jimmy_Snuka 2 points ago +2 / -0

I watch real America’s voice, OANN, Gregg Kelly on newsmax. Various radio shows. As for the Communist propaganda.....hard pass

2
Tweedlethree 2 points ago +2 / -0

Trump mentioned them.

2
SomeGuyOnTheInternet 2 points ago +2 / -0

Because OAN isn't available on comcast.

2
here2red 2 points ago +4 / -2

Cuz OANN sux. Im not talking about the articles or the stories. Im talking about the station itself. You cant find it and even if you can it buffers like crazy.

5
bigbossman2 5 points ago +5 / -0

because they don't have all the money they would normally get from selling their soul to advertisers

1
torr071 1 point ago +1 / -0

use the internet. using cable and buying cable lines the pockets of those you are fighting.

2
yudsfpbc 2 points ago +2 / -0

BECAUSE THEY ARE HERE AMONG US

2
thelastlast 2 points ago +2 / -0

SEE: Parler vs Gab

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
torr071 1 point ago +1 / -0

odysee is very bad for data,would advise against it as it works in the background of whatever device or cpu you use. can see it on phone or task manager, freakin data hog. OANN does have its own website though, printed version and some videos, never seen a buffer.

2
ANTI_Globalist12 2 points ago +2 / -0

No problem, we will tank Newsmax too ! Let's move to OANN and NTD ! SPREAD IT !

2
torr071 2 points ago +2 / -0

i use bit chute. just search for Chanel rion or oann, greg kelly, or any of your fave shows. They either have a channel (timpool, salty, etc) or someone is mirroring them from out of country.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
torr071 1 point ago +1 / -0

its fine on their site. you using cable to watch them is the problem. they arent a cable news, they are a news source though, like many others that arent on cable... because most of us do not use cable 8)

1
Captain_MAGA 1 point ago +1 / -0

The rush to Newsmax on this site seemed a little weird to me when it happened, when we still had people like RSBN and Crowder who have been here the whole time.

1
I_lost_my_password 1 point ago +1 / -0

Crowder is not a news show/ channel though. I have a paid Subscription to Mug Club, but would hardly call then a news show.

1
torr071 1 point ago +1 / -0

Crowder has gone weird. not sure whats up with him. he needs to be himbled though, he's good, but he's gone full god-mode. like Salty has been doing lately, they both going religious zealot and forgetting Crowder was a comedian, Salty was a gamer.. and that's their base, not right wing religious zealotry.. go watch Pat Robertson for that crap.

1
Egg_sammich 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes I did notice that and it was very ruse that we touted NEWSMAX over OANN who was with us from the beginning. Very rude to OANN.

1
Dev404 1 point ago +1 / -0

Found that weird myself.

1
Airvehicle2 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don’t know, but the Chris Salcedo show in the mornings is pretty damned based. I watch it now instead of Fox and Friends.

1
spezisthedevil 1 point ago +1 / -0

INFOWARS.COM

1
DeusVult2020 1 point ago +1 / -0

Same with gab. Everyone switched to fucking Parler........ Which block tdw links lol

1
KYMAGApatriot1 1 point ago +1 / -0

After viewing Newsmax and Oan it didn’t take me long to decide who had the most fair and honest coverage of this election mess.

1
wumao 1 point ago +1 / -0

They're all shit. OAN is a little better, but by nature of being s news organization jt is still shit.

1
Hayride 1 point ago +1 / -0

Newsmax have already blown their cover. The neocons couldn't help themselves. Who's going to be controlled opposition when they can't bring themselves to oppose anything? Newsmax = neocon b.s.

1
DRKMSTR 1 point ago +1 / -0

And also RSBN, they came out of nowhere because nobody was covering all of Trump's rallies.

1
VickVinager 1 point ago +1 / -0

Wondered this from the jump. OAN always seemed like the logical default. OAN already had a decent amount of support among MAGA supporters for their work during his first term. I had never even heard of NewsMax until the day after the election

1
BQQSH1776 1 point ago +1 / -0

I've often wondered this myself. 🤔

1
torr071 1 point ago +1 / -0

ppl went to newsmax because when fox called arizona, most of us were already getting our news from Youtube, Newsmax had a 24/7 feed on youtube, and had tons of shows regularly playing. OANN had 0, you had to search for 'sexy lady from WH Press Corps!' to find OANN. NTD had Youtube Channels as well as Epoch Times, and while they do a great job,they are sus to China influence, though tbh it's the people of China not the CCP.. so it's more like Reuters. AFter the Youtube purge things evened out, also Newsmax showed it's true colors. but I digress, OANN is damn good, but it's cause Chanel Rion is not only the hottest woman on the planet, she's a damn good journalist, but also the hottest woman on the planet, did I mention she was hot??

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
Jack_HinsonTN 1 point ago +1 / -0

The phrase of the day is "controlled opposition." Fox is no longer useful, so a new voice is needed. Enter Newsmax.

1
Varangian 1 point ago +1 / -0

OANN on Pluto is all reruns.

1
MrGentleHeart 1 point ago +1 / -0

I unsubscribed the moment they started calling bejing biden the "President elect"

1
BoomSticksWin 1 point ago +1 / -0

Newsmax was shinny and it talked fancy. I'm sorry, OK!!!!

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0