What they’re saying is that there is a potential based on a previous Supreme Court ruling in Wisconsin that stated there was a potential misuse of absentee ballots. It’s up to the Trump campaign to dispute each ballot separately providing evidence to show the voter didn’t meet the definition of “indefinitely confined.” That’s still in process.
What they’re saying is that there is a potential based on a previous Supreme Court ruling in Wisconsin that stated there was a potential misuse of absentee ballots. It’s up to the Trump campaign to dispute each ballot separately providing evidence to show the voter didn’t meet the definition of “indefinitely confined.” That’s still in process.