Asking me to read 23 times after I already did does not help your argument at all.
Your points as I stated are off topic, irrelevant, and nonsensical.
If you want to turn this into a list a fallacies that’s fine. Ad Nauseam clearly applies here friend. You’re literally just repeating your poor logic and nonsense.
Furthermore cite your own bullshit before pulling classic reddit garbage and requesting that of others.
This latest line is my favorite in terms of your flawed and ridiculous stupidity. Your replies are literally insufferable. Half this stuff could be written by Assange himself. Because your both obviously fond of sniffing your own farts.
Moreover, if you're not sure he can be trusted, how in the hell can he deserve a pardon?
This reveals a couple of things.
It cuts through your layers of bullshit and shows this is simply a favor for fucking over Hillary. You could clearly care less about all the other garbage you’re spewing.
To better explain above it’s clear you think trust is a factor in terms of a pardon. Why? Is this a quid pro quo? Which leads to...
Pardons are about injustice. It’s now clear your approach here here has nothing to do with that.
Blocked, your stupid argument via quantity rather than quality is European style politics at its finest. America left that behind over 200 years ago.
Or you could answer any one of my points.
I don’t think a single one of any of those comebacks made logical sense.
Like the whole Wikileaks unmatched record. What?!? What does that have to do with the argument at all.
Wikileaks will literally publish anything. It’s not just fuckery. It’s your moms bank records.
At some point that position does become indefensible.
The problem is one of ethics and trust.
Snowden is ethical at least. I don’t know if he can be trusted.
Assange has no ethics and has always shown that no one can trust him.
I think Assange is getting fucked by the system but if I’m being honest it’s an imperfect solution to an imperfect problem.
Because Glenn Greenwood is deep state.
Go to the new conspiracies site if you want to spout off obvious mockingbird type stuff. I see right through it.
Asking me to read 23 times after I already did does not help your argument at all.
Your points as I stated are off topic, irrelevant, and nonsensical.
If you want to turn this into a list a fallacies that’s fine. Ad Nauseam clearly applies here friend. You’re literally just repeating your poor logic and nonsense.
Furthermore cite your own bullshit before pulling classic reddit garbage and requesting that of others.
This latest line is my favorite in terms of your flawed and ridiculous stupidity. Your replies are literally insufferable. Half this stuff could be written by Assange himself. Because your both obviously fond of sniffing your own farts.
This reveals a couple of things.
It cuts through your layers of bullshit and shows this is simply a favor for fucking over Hillary. You could clearly care less about all the other garbage you’re spewing.
To better explain above it’s clear you think trust is a factor in terms of a pardon. Why? Is this a quid pro quo? Which leads to...
Pardons are about injustice. It’s now clear your approach here here has nothing to do with that.
Blocked, your stupid argument via quantity rather than quality is European style politics at its finest. America left that behind over 200 years ago.