5484 Just released! Trump Pardons - List of people (www.whitehouse.gov) posted 114 days ago by ukwatcher 114 days ago by ukwatcher +5484 / -0 678 comments share 678 comments share save hide report block hide child comments Comments (678) sorted by: top new old worst You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread. ▲ -2 ▼ – deleted -2 points 114 days ago +1 / -3 ▲ 0 ▼ – SpiceMustFlow 0 points 114 days ago +1 / -1 Assange’s “principle” is all I do should be free. It’s like playing a game of cards and having your buddy’s weird friend show up and say everyone should have everything face up on the table. Both the weird guy and Assange are principled and both are self serving idiots for suggesting such a thing. You’re straight projecting anyway. No one is going to leak the entirety of NSAs work to cover for a grudge. There’s plenty ty of better ways to cover for something. However Assange definitely was interested in fucking over Hillary. Everyone knows that. Snowden is the correct choice here. permalink parent save report block reply ▲ -2 ▼ – deleted -2 points 114 days ago +1 / -3 ▲ 0 ▼ – SpiceMustFlow 0 points 114 days ago +1 / -1 Or you could answer any one of my points. I don’t think a single one of any of those comebacks made logical sense. Like the whole Wikileaks unmatched record. What?!? What does that have to do with the argument at all. Wikileaks will literally publish anything. It’s not just fuckery. It’s your moms bank records. At some point that position does become indefensible. The problem is one of ethics and trust. Snowden is ethical at least. I don’t know if he can be trusted. Assange has no ethics and has always shown that no one can trust him. I think Assange is getting fucked by the system but if I’m being honest it’s an imperfect solution to an imperfect problem. Only if you're dim enough to accept the Official Narrative™ proffered by the very Deep State you claim to despise. Because Glenn Greenwood is deep state. Go to the new conspiracies site if you want to spout off obvious mockingbird type stuff. I see right through it. permalink parent save report block reply
Assange’s “principle” is all I do should be free.
It’s like playing a game of cards and having your buddy’s weird friend show up and say everyone should have everything face up on the table.
Both the weird guy and Assange are principled and both are self serving idiots for suggesting such a thing.
You’re straight projecting anyway.
No one is going to leak the entirety of NSAs work to cover for a grudge. There’s plenty ty of better ways to cover for something.
However Assange definitely was interested in fucking over Hillary. Everyone knows that.
Snowden is the correct choice here.
Or you could answer any one of my points.
I don’t think a single one of any of those comebacks made logical sense.
Like the whole Wikileaks unmatched record. What?!? What does that have to do with the argument at all.
Wikileaks will literally publish anything. It’s not just fuckery. It’s your moms bank records.
At some point that position does become indefensible.
The problem is one of ethics and trust.
Snowden is ethical at least. I don’t know if he can be trusted.
Assange has no ethics and has always shown that no one can trust him.
I think Assange is getting fucked by the system but if I’m being honest it’s an imperfect solution to an imperfect problem.
Because Glenn Greenwood is deep state.
Go to the new conspiracies site if you want to spout off obvious mockingbird type stuff. I see right through it.