Asking me to read 23 times after I already did does not help your argument at all.
Your points as I stated are off topic, irrelevant, and nonsensical.
If you want to turn this into a list a fallacies that’s fine. Ad Nauseam clearly applies here friend. You’re literally just repeating your poor logic and nonsense.
Furthermore cite your own bullshit before pulling classic reddit garbage and requesting that of others.
This latest line is my favorite in terms of your flawed and ridiculous stupidity. Your replies are literally insufferable. Half this stuff could be written by Assange himself. Because your both obviously fond of sniffing your own farts.
Moreover, if you're not sure he can be trusted, how in the hell can he deserve a pardon?
This reveals a couple of things.
It cuts through your layers of bullshit and shows this is simply a favor for fucking over Hillary. You could clearly care less about all the other garbage you’re spewing.
To better explain above it’s clear you think trust is a factor in terms of a pardon. Why? Is this a quid pro quo? Which leads to...
Pardons are about injustice. It’s now clear your approach here here has nothing to do with that.
Blocked, your stupid argument via quantity rather than quality is European style politics at its finest. America left that behind over 200 years ago.
Asking me to read 23 times after I already did does not help your argument at all.
Your points as I stated are off topic, irrelevant, and nonsensical.
If you want to turn this into a list a fallacies that’s fine. Ad Nauseam clearly applies here friend. You’re literally just repeating your poor logic and nonsense.
Furthermore cite your own bullshit before pulling classic reddit garbage and requesting that of others.
This latest line is my favorite in terms of your flawed and ridiculous stupidity. Your replies are literally insufferable. Half this stuff could be written by Assange himself. Because your both obviously fond of sniffing your own farts.
This reveals a couple of things.
It cuts through your layers of bullshit and shows this is simply a favor for fucking over Hillary. You could clearly care less about all the other garbage you’re spewing.
To better explain above it’s clear you think trust is a factor in terms of a pardon. Why? Is this a quid pro quo? Which leads to...
Pardons are about injustice. It’s now clear your approach here here has nothing to do with that.
Blocked, your stupid argument via quantity rather than quality is European style politics at its finest. America left that behind over 200 years ago.