42
posted ago by MaxwellChase +42 / -0

From White House Memo:

" Article II, Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution requires that “Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors.” Therefore, the papers (or “slates”) the states attempted to submit to the President of the Senate and Archivist of the United States are not legal, permissible certificates of votes and lists by Electors as recited in Title 3, U.S.C., sections 9 and 11. Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin violated the U.S. Constitution’s Art. 2, S.1, Cl.2 and 14th Amendment, Section 1, Equal Protection Clause in administering their elections, therefore rendering their slates impermissible.

On Dec. 14, the States consummated a fraudulent and Constitutionally deficient certification of their electors as required by 3 USC 7. State and federal authorities have discovered Overwhelming evidence of election fraud and irregularities since Nov. 4, likely rising to the level of criminal election fraud and public corruption. Civil courts dismissed these claims procedurally, rather than on substance. "

I found this article here:

https://nationalfile.com/exclusive-white-house-memo-details-how-pence-card-can-save-trumps-presidency-on-dec-23/

I would also like to point out that the deadline is December 23rd, if the Silver Fox is going to do something, it has to be by tomorrow.

From White House Memo: " Article II, Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution requires that “Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors.” Therefore, the papers (or “slates”) the states attempted to submit to the President of the Senate and Archivist of the United States are not legal, permissible certificates of votes and lists by Electors as recited in Title 3, U.S.C., sections 9 and 11. Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin violated the U.S. Constitution’s Art. 2, S.1, Cl.2 and 14th Amendment, Section 1, Equal Protection Clause in administering their elections, therefore rendering their slates impermissible. On Dec. 14, the States consummated a fraudulent and Constitutionally deficient certification of their electors as required by 3 USC 7. State and federal authorities have discovered Overwhelming evidence of election fraud and irregularities since Nov. 4, likely rising to the level of criminal election fraud and public corruption. Civil courts dismissed these claims procedurally, rather than on substance. " I found this article here: https://nationalfile.com/exclusive-white-house-memo-details-how-pence-card-can-save-trumps-presidency-on-dec-23/ I would also like to point out that the deadline is December 23rd, if the Silver Fox is going to do something, it has to be by tomorrow.
Comments (19)
sorted by:
5
PNW_PEPE 5 points ago +6 / -1

this would make for a badass Christmas, but I'm fairly sure it won't happen. I really hope it does though

1
Syndilou1a 1 point ago +1 / -0

Why Not?

1
PNW_PEPE 1 point ago +1 / -0

Seems too good to be true... it's been such a slog up to this point it just doesn't seem like there is "one thing" that will turn it. I think jan 6th is the start of the cascade that will create 2 weeks of absolute turmoil

2
namechangearoo 2 points ago +2 / -0

Let’s save the Trump cards for the 6th and let the hilarity ensue. I will be driving to DC to make sure I have a front row seat to America taking back our republic. .

1
121jigawatts 1 point ago +1 / -0

The conjunction last night and now Pence. Also . . . Look up Pence in the house of names and Mike who is the VP of the USA is not even mentioned. What the hell?!

https://www.houseofnames.com/pence-family-crest

1
Neonlightdistrict 1 point ago +1 / -0

Doesn't he need 270 regardless?

1
MaxwellChase [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

There won't be 538 possible electoral votes available. You don't need 270.

1
One-Man_Riot 1 point ago +1 / -0

That's not how it works, champ.

1
Neonlightdistrict 1 point ago +1 / -0

I know but what does it say in the constitution?

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
0
Mehocmehogan 0 points ago +1 / -1

This is going to be fun. Even if Pence cucks President Trump wins on 1/6 with two sets of electors.

1
MaxwellChase [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Would really like to know what you mean, lol

1
MaxwellChase [S] 1 point ago +2 / -1

Don't follow. Whats do you mean he wins on the 6th with two sets of electors? Sorry if I am behind on something.

1
Mehocmehogan 1 point ago +2 / -1

Each of the 7 contested swing states has two sets of electors. A GOP set and a Democrat set. When two sets show up on the 6th when the President of the Senate Pence opens the envelope to count the electors a senator and a congressman demand the other set be counted. It’s contested. Then it is sent to congress where they count the number of State Legislatures that are GOP controlled. Each is one vote for Trump. Then they count the Democrat state legislatures and each democrat state is one vote for Biden. Since there are more republican controlled state legislatures than democrat President Trump wins.

It’s all constitutional.

2
Mangomangomango89 2 points ago +2 / -0

It's not really two sets. The state GOP in the swing states sent electors, but they do not currently have support from the state legislatures or any other state entity. So for now they are not even an option. That's why it's imperative we get these state legislatures to appoint them and decertify the Biden electors.

1
Mehocmehogan 1 point ago +1 / -0

I’ll wait for the 6th. I feel confident in my assessment.

1
Mangomangomango89 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's false confidence, there is only one certified set right now. Need to pressure the legislatures

1
Mehocmehogan 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well we’ll see soon enough who’s right.