12
Comments (10)
sorted by:
6
shadypollster 6 points ago +6 / -0

Hilarious. No competing electors were sent to the electoral college vote. January 6th is when their legal status will come in handy.

You HAVE to designated alternate electors for them to be valid replacements on January 6th.

Hilarious. Nice misleading title.

I r8 b8 8/8

1
FluhanWu [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

This rating has been debooonked by the video. Did you watch it? I do not understand your assessment of misleading title. Rand Paul did say in t be interview that in order for anything to be done about this election competing electors would have needed to be sent which no state has done (he said).

3
shadypollster 3 points ago +3 / -0

No. He said no competing electors were at the electoral college vote. Rand said the key to this fight is at the state level. He also threw in a little doomerism "we'll do better next time"

You see, I actually watched the video.

1
FluhanWu [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

How is that any different from title.

1
shadypollster 1 point ago +1 / -0

Your title is misleading as it lacks proper context.

1
FluhanWu [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

The video is the context.

1
shadypollster 1 point ago +1 / -0

Then why are we having this conversation? It ain't because I'm wrong.

0
FluhanWu [S] 0 points ago +1 / -1

I agree your comments have added valuable context to the title/video I posted. That being said I did not intentionally mislead anyone. For those that may have been misled by my post, I hope they read your comment prior to watching the video.

5
hazelknut 5 points ago +5 / -0

National File first covered Pence’s responsibility to act lawfully on December 23 last weekend. Thus far, National File has not been able to locate a relevant public comment from Pence or his surrogates.
https://thedonald.win/p/11RNjy6q52/the-news-i-am-waiting-to-hear-to/

-13
deleted -13 points ago +1 / -14