20
Comments (10)
sorted by:
4
Triggeralert411 4 points ago +4 / -0

They have to get him to reject the 2000$ now that they didn’t take out the pork.

3
clueless_expert 3 points ago +3 / -0

They want him to sign this bill to nullify his use of the insurrection act.

1
Winston [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Agreed. It was an attempted trap.

Checkers vs. Chess.

2
TXRanger 2 points ago +2 / -0

TAKE OUT THE PORK SPENDING and SEND IT TO THE CITIZENS WHO PAID IT IN

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
JohnMcCainsTumors 2 points ago +3 / -1

Something is really really fishy about this I don't trust it at all

1
_ra247 1 point ago +1 / -0

It’s because the pork is the entire point of the bill, and they’re reframing the issue to be 600 v 2000 while ignoring the other issues.

They hate you. They don’t respect you. They despise you.

Making it 600 v 2000, and ‘agreeing’ with the 2000, puts the bill back on his desk with the same pork. Trump slam dunked on the DS, but if you haven’t figure it out, the DS is offensive, tactical, manipulative, and must - by any means necessary - seize and maintain control. Agree with the 2000 immediately to take control of the situation

1
deleted 1 point ago +2 / -1
1
Choosetheform 1 point ago +1 / -0

Where did the 600 dollar figure come from? All spending originates in the House.

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1