It’s a party vote. The republicans would never vote for a principled libertarian to be their leader. They need a straight establishment type to pander to lobbyists and other special interests.
oh- well idk just hop on the bandwagon with a couple metaphorical pitchforks (or literal pitchforks if that's your thing, i guess. i don't really care anymore) claiming he stole the election in KY
Because the cabal won't allow someone so based to be in a real position of leadership. only the thugs keeping our $$$ hostage
It’s a party vote. The republicans would never vote for a principled libertarian to be their leader. They need a straight establishment type to pander to lobbyists and other special interests.
by voting him out
Eh, besides voting. Don’t really see much evidence of that working anymore...
oh- well idk just hop on the bandwagon with a couple metaphorical pitchforks (or literal pitchforks if that's your thing, i guess. i don't really care anymore) claiming he stole the election in KY
He could be taken out of the leadership position by vote, but the person who attempts this has to be extremely skilled at political backstabbing.
If you take your shot and miss???
To quote Ralph Waldo Emerson: 'When you strike at the king, you must kill him."
Because the rest of them know they would have to actually work if he was