1647
Comments (31)
sorted by:
17
deleted 17 points ago +17 / -0
9
T-Bear 9 points ago +9 / -0

Oh, but you absolutely KNOW the Democrats would litigate it!

...even IF the process is Constitutionally proscribed completely.

Remember - if the rules do not allow a Democrat to win, they take it to court enough until the rules are changed, so that they win.

Democrat SOP for the last 30 years....

2
buco 2 points ago +2 / -0

Roberts would give them standing...

8
Dereliction 8 points ago +10 / -2

We're long past time to go on the offense.

3
AmericanGuy 3 points ago +3 / -0

Better late than never

6
meredithcat2017 6 points ago +6 / -0

Do it! It’ll be thrown out because the Dems have lack of standing, that’s how it works right?

5
RamboToaster 5 points ago +5 / -0

Oh man, you guys are MISSING A REALLY IMPORTANT POINT. There are 7 contested states who sent dueling electors. why is New Mexico flying under the radar? If we count them all, Trump wins. If we don't count them all, Trump wins. If we take out any single state, Trump wins.

1
jamesfinmadison2 1 point ago +1 / -0

Only the party electors of the candidate who won count, unless they get rejected by the VP or rejected in a private session based on a challenge.

The R and D leadership are likely to avoid a contingent election based on disagreement. They are more likely to toss one or two states, and give the win to Biden to avoid a contingent election.

The entire point of the Pence Card is the recognition that there is no R card, no contingent election card likely to be played.

1
EdisonHwy 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thanks

1
jamesfinmadison2 1 point ago +1 / -0

You're welcome.

1
RamboToaster 1 point ago +1 / -0

10 times extra electors have been sent to DC. 10 times they have been counted.

1
jamesfinmadison2 1 point ago +1 / -0

Have we been owned by China then? Any sources for these 10 events I could read?

We have a unique situation here. Mitch is literally caught asking the R party to NOT challenge.

Not sure what history gives you confidence over that.

1
RamboToaster 1 point ago +1 / -0

I got a little excited, and I'm struggling to find the article. I got it from TD, and trying to search for anything in a search engine leads to bullshit recent articles. So there were multiple times that electors were sent without certification at all, or with improper certification, or where alternate electors were suddenly allowed at the last minute, or where the certification was questionable, and every single time, the President of the Senate included those votes in his count.

So I'm saying, there is precedent for Pence to just count both sets for every state. Then both houses of congress would need to agree to overturn his decision.

Maybe Mitch knows that. Maybe he's being a cheeky bastard to Biden. Look, I'm as clueless as anybody. All I know is the electorally casted vote score is currently Trump 316-306.

1
jamesfinmadison2 1 point ago +1 / -0

My understanding is the alternate electors are useful and counted if the primary party electors become void due to the VP rejecting (possible but hasn't happened) or a challenge (has happened), or a finding of a late different winner happens when a recount is not possible in the time window or ruling of fraud by a court. The congress can reject electors, but cannot create them, so the alternate electors become valuable in any of these cases.

A recount swung HI from Kennedy to Nixon in this way, but the congress still gave HI to Kennedy because no challenge was made because it would not have tipped it all to a win for Nixon.

This is why Miller said sending alternate electors leaves legal doors open. They do not count though unless congress challenges the original party elector ballot slates.

5
Behind_Blue_Lines_II 5 points ago +5 / -0

The courts will be tripping over themselves to hear these cases if the democommies are the plaintiffs

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
0
Trumpfan1 0 points ago +3 / -3

What about what VP Pence needs to do today (12/23)? Has that been done? How will we find out?

9
deleted 9 points ago +9 / -0
3
Trumpfan1 3 points ago +4 / -1

Ok. Thanks.

1
deleted 1 point ago +2 / -1
0
pepperedtrail 0 points ago +1 / -1

There's something about Pence doing something today. I don't completely understand it but apparently the deadline is today.

11
Spez_BTFO_v2 11 points ago +12 / -1

There is not deadline for Pence today. The states have to have their votes delivered to Pence today. It's a deadline on them, not Pence. Pence has until Jan 6th.

7
pepperedtrail 7 points ago +7 / -0

Thank you for clarifying.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
3
Best4Business 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yeah, I have ZERO faith in the SCOTUS after their little temper tantrum lead by Pedo Roberts.

1
pithys 1 point ago +1 / -0

If we have any chance of certifying alternative slates of electors Pence won't notify states because it will throw out all slates

1
jackdaniels 1 point ago +1 / -0

How fast can you say "standing" lol

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
RedReddit 1 point ago +1 / -0

Fuck that. The courts chose not to get involved so they don't get to get involved after the fact, either.

1
Dilis 1 point ago +1 / -0

Remember the appearance of judicial bias.