11
Comments (7)
sorted by:
1
AgnesDomini 1 point ago +1 / -0

No, Dobbs is based. "I have not seen" is NOT the same as "I have researched or inspected" machines. I haven't seen also can mean I haven't looked at or inspected anything. Q: "Do you know whether or not that's true?" A: "That (the denial) is my understanding." Translation? "I don't know one way or another, it's just what has been said." Read the screen caption. This is a look at the CLAIMS, and not a look at the SOFTWARE, REVORDS, MACHINES, BALLOTS, OR ANY OTHER EVIDENCE. This is pure spin, foisted on Dobbs by FOX execs, to try to lend credibility to their narrative. Even the questions aren't Dobbs---they won't date let him interview the guy directly. Learn to read between the lines, Pedes.

1
IlIlIlIlIl 1 point ago +1 / -0

This guys doesn’t know anything.

1
MusicToMyEars 1 point ago +1 / -0

Why have on someone who willfully knows nothing and call him an expert? He may be an expert in some field, but clearly is “not aware” of anything regarding the 2020 elections, election fraud or current news. Lou Dobbs’ producers are setting him up. Absurd waste of time.

1
Deplora 1 point ago +1 / -0

Everybody seems to be under extreme legal pressure to broadcast/print the same Dominion-Smartmatic talking points. We're supposed to be smart enough to realize this, and realize that not a single one of them actually believes it, or expects us to believe it.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
Deplora 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thye hired a PR firm run by one of Perino's old buddies from the White House press office. Next day, a guy from that firm was on Perino's "news" program singing Dominion's praises and Perino was saying on another "opinion" program that Dominion should sue the people who are accusing it of enabling election fraud. Dominion still hasn't sued anybody and isn't likely to because the last thing Dominion wants is to go through discovery -- they're doing a lot of cage-rattling, and even if they file some suits, they won't go through with them.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0