Not only am I calling you one, but you are one. Over-represented is irrelevant. There's a handful of them. The percentage of them compared to the percentage of Jews is negligible. To focus on one race because there are 3x as many (30% instead of 10% of the media), while ignoring the other 70% because you want to focus on race makes you a BIGOT.
So 30% of the handful of evil people are Jewish when it should be 10% statistically, so let's call it a "Jewish problem."
I just explained it in my previous post. But rather than throw around name-calling, which is what people who are unable to debate logic do, why not tell my why this statement is incorrect, if you're not a glowie:
To focus on one race because there are 3x as many (30% instead of 10% of the media), while ignoring the other 70% because you want to focus on race makes you a BIGOT.
PS: I used YOUR number in that statement. 300%. Dunno if you're accurate or not but I did the math for you. Let's see if you're smart enough to understand it.
Yes. The handful of Jews who control the media don't represent Jews or what they believe. So again, you're being a bigot.
If you think the MSM is fake, but you think how Jews are represented in the media is accurate, then congratulations, you're a bigot!
There is a Jewish mafia, there's an Italian mafia, there's a Chinese mafia: they don't represent Jews, Italians and the Chinese people.
Not only am I calling you one, but you are one. Over-represented is irrelevant. There's a handful of them. The percentage of them compared to the percentage of Jews is negligible. To focus on one race because there are 3x as many (30% instead of 10% of the media), while ignoring the other 70% because you want to focus on race makes you a BIGOT.
So 30% of the handful of evil people are Jewish when it should be 10% statistically, so let's call it a "Jewish problem."
Also I think you might be a glowie.
I just explained it in my previous post. But rather than throw around name-calling, which is what people who are unable to debate logic do, why not tell my why this statement is incorrect, if you're not a glowie:
PS: I used YOUR number in that statement. 300%. Dunno if you're accurate or not but I did the math for you. Let's see if you're smart enough to understand it.