83
Comments (9)
sorted by:
11
BS2020 11 points ago +11 / -0

its actually a mistake -- all Trump has to do is call the hag out and say once again, Americans could have got a little more money and Grandma Pelosi took it away for her own political purposes and now I have to Veto and send a reindeer to run that c**t over

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
4
Ralphusthegreatus 4 points ago +4 / -0

She knows Rand Paul will vote against it. He doesn't vote for any increased spending.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
2
Itscrazytime 2 points ago +2 / -0

So as much as I hate Nancy Pelosi, the unanimous consent is meant to expedite things and is usually only implemented on non controversial items that they know will pass their legislatures. It makes it where they do not have to drag out questions for the entire thing.

This is more so likely being done so people don't question what is in it, not so that it won't get passed. It will benefit her like crazy if it gets passed because a lot of the money in this will be funneled directly to her wallet.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
MAGA_____bitches 2 points ago +2 / -0

unanimous consent - A senator may request unanimous consent on the floor to set aside a specified rule of procedure so as to expedite proceedings. If no Senator objects, the Senate permits the action, but if any one senator objects, the request is rejected.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
2
TaxDollarsHardAtWork [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

About as reliable as Nadler's Depends.