-Call out some blacks being bad actors, perfectly fine. Nobody assumes it's all of them. It's to help them sort out the bad elements.
-Call out some whites being bad actors, perfectly fine. Nobody assumes it's all of them. It's to help them sort out the bad elements
-Call out some "[[[Christians]]]" being bad actors "YOU JUST HATE ALL OF THEM"
If it's truly NAXALT, they need to stop sperging out every time patterns get noticed, otherwise it comes off as covering for the bad actor's misdeeds. I'm not going to lose my shit over people calling out every white liberal who loves to wash rapper's feet, but I sure as shit want to know who the traitors are.
What percentage of the american population are christian? like 1-2%? Thats crazy...
OP is trying to make folks feel guilty about having pattern recognition, which ironically fits the pattern perfectly.
If you want to look into the Balfour declaration, you might get an idea where he's going with this.
People use parentheses to point out bad things done by (((Jews))).
Atheist is lazy cop out. Agnostic is at least respectable. Like actually a ((())) possibly probably.
Technically, I'm an Agnostic Atheist (it's a thing), but I didn't want to distract from the argument with that detail.
-Call out some blacks being bad actors, perfectly fine. Nobody assumes it's all of them. It's to help them sort out the bad elements.
-Call out some whites being bad actors, perfectly fine. Nobody assumes it's all of them. It's to help them sort out the bad elements
-Call out some "[[[Christians]]]" being bad actors "YOU JUST HATE ALL OF THEM"
If it's truly NAXALT, they need to stop sperging out every time patterns get noticed, otherwise it comes off as covering for the bad actor's misdeeds. I'm not going to lose my shit over people calling out every white liberal who loves to wash rapper's feet, but I sure as shit want to know who the traitors are.
Um ok? Maybe I need more coffee but to me your point is lost by how distracting all the ((()))s are in the text.