41
posted ago by salty_popcorn ago by salty_popcorn +42 / -1

Following 9/11, government intelligence agencies were mandated to share SAPs and intelligence to create more unified intelligence front, which 9/11 was falsely used as a pretext for.

Snowden was CIA before transferring to NSA in Hawaii. At the NSA, he used patriotism as a front to not only rightfully expose the NSA collections that were/are unconstitutional, but also to dump details of the SAPs (Special Access Programs). Given the CIA likely failed to comply/was exempt from sharing their SAPs, this left the US gov without secret tools needed to gain intelligence on foreign adversaries, while the CIA kept theirs.

This was internal sabotage of non CIA intelligence gathering methods.

Fuck snowden.

Assange on the other hand simply performed the kind of journalism needed in this world, with the highest degree of integrity.

Comments (12)
sorted by:
3
fourmyle33 3 points ago +3 / -0

No fuck both the NSA and CIA. Prism being a secret was unacceptable.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
BStoo 2 points ago +3 / -1

And they all attempted to take down Trump and no ones gone to prison. Pardon every AMERICAN ever jailed by CIA, FBI etc etc. and continue to do so until we eliminate the DC Two Tiered “justice” system.

1
salty_popcorn [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Uhh.. what?

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
salty_popcorn [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

I completely agree. Snowden didn't hurt the CIA though.

Assange did.

1
Sweden_wuz_Rite 1 point ago +1 / -0

You know, I know this and still read it wrong and went w it...lmao.

1
looncraz 1 point ago +1 / -0

Assange vetted the information he released - they received far more than they released. Snowden dumped everything he could get his hands on. Night and day.

What Assange did was troublesome, but understandable and generally honorable in its execution and in some ways little more than what investigative journalists used to do... when they still existed... what Snowden did was treason.

1
Schelsky 1 point ago +1 / -0

Given that left/green parties here in Germany are "against surveillance" and that a movie about Snowden ran in the middle of Berlin some years ago without Antifa intervention, I also came to the conclusion that being "against surveillance" is some deep state method to protect own wrongdoing such as drug trafficking, human trafficking or election fraud. Recently I also had the hypothesis that NSA and CIA must be on opposing sides in the battle for power and that's why there are only books about exposing the NSA such as "Der NSA Komplex", even a best-seller in the far left magazine "Der Spiegel": https://www.amazon.de/-/en/NSA-Komplex-Edward-Snowden-totale-%C3%9Cberwachung/dp/3421046581

Also see my sociological explanation. Hypothesis: CIA must be a tool of the modern "clergy" while the NSA is not: https://thedonald.win/p/11Q8XTiXDw/sociological-explanation-of-what/

1
VaPnut 1 point ago +1 / -0

Assange only wanted to expose US Secrets. Using homos in the military to turn against their oath of service. He never posted much, if anything, from Red China or Russia or any other communist country. I'm OK with both of them suffering. I hope Snowden never gets to see his mother alive again. Fuck them

1
salty_popcorn [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Wikileaks could only publish what they had, what was given to them.

Assange published Podesta emails...

They've published plenty of international material.

Just go to their website, if you would like to be more informed

1
1A_FTW 1 point ago +1 / -0

If I remember correctly, he posted something like 800k Russian documents or pages of Russian documents.