Once you pointed that out I took another look. One thing that stood out to me was the NIH logos behind him. They could possibly have printed them backwards but that seems unlikely.
NIH correct in suit video. Man's shirt pocket is on the left-hand side of the shot-taking video and most men wear watch on the left, so that checks out.
Don't know why you'd presume to know what I accept. Everyone needs to make sure to go on the offensive with good info. It doesn't help us to share something that is readily deboonked.
Thanks to those who replied with ways of verifying it wasn't just a flip. The video quality I first viewed it at made it difficult to distinguish details of his face.
What would be the argument that he could be streaming on a service that flipped the image?
Does he have any facial markings we can look for to verify the camera is not flipped in the second video?
I'd say this is a huge tell if it can be verified the image is not flipped.
Once you pointed that out I took another look. One thing that stood out to me was the NIH logos behind him. They could possibly have printed them backwards but that seems unlikely.
NIH correct in suit video. Man's shirt pocket is on the left-hand side of the shot-taking video and most men wear watch on the left, so that checks out.
Nice 👍
Either they flipped the video or his wife left him and took the wedding ring with her.
You mean like McCain’s boot?
Look, it’s clown fucking world out there, how much longer are you going to accept it?
Don't know why you'd presume to know what I accept. Everyone needs to make sure to go on the offensive with good info. It doesn't help us to share something that is readily deboonked.
Thanks to those who replied with ways of verifying it wasn't just a flip. The video quality I first viewed it at made it difficult to distinguish details of his face.