It's not really about the ladies or the bikinis you know. It's about generating a large number of posts that aren't about Trump or election-related issues in a short amount of time, and masking those off-topic posts by throwing a "MAGA" in there so it doesn't look like obvious trolling. If the women didn't have "MAGA" in the picture, but were simple bikini-babes pics, they'd be deleted right away. It's spam, designed to suppress legitimate conversation, pure and simple.
personally I do not post for numbers, I post diversions so doomers and downs can have a laugh or enjoy thinking about something else for a change. the root of prejudice is pre-judge, don't assume other peoples motives
I watched the board fill up with bikini pics from a single user while real discussion threads were pushed down to the bottom of the list last night, I know what spamming looks like when I see it. Don't try to gaslight me.
Don't post bikini pics, people don't like them and you're not "cheering up doomers". You're spamming, and antagonizing Christians as well, OP is 100% right.
buddy I am a christian and I don't believe anyone should tell anyone else what they can share on a "free platform". you are showing yourselves to be no different than the people we oppose. the lord said to isaiah "come let us reason together"...you should complain to the moderators,not browbeat people who think differently than you. and why don't you click my about button and see if I have posted any bikini pictures,you will be disappointed
...meanwhile, 95% of your posts are images. I’ve been looking at beautiful MAGA babes on t_D for years and don’t need some Karen dictating what type of board this is or should be. Fuck outta here with this shit.
I am married with children but will always appreciate seeing good looking women in bikinis. I guess I am "part of the problem". Not sure I see the definition of "problem" the same way you do. But Merry Christmas!
I dislike seeing that stuff, too. I’m with the OP. It’s junk that people don’t need to see and isn’t helpful, and I don’t want to be ambushed by it. 90% of you are completely enslaved to porn and other salacious media, and you don’t even know it. I just want to see Trump and other conservative news. If you want to post porn (even of the soft-core variety), Reddit will welcome you with open arms. They’re all over it.
You have a right to your opinion and men have a right to look at a woman who chose to pose in her bikini. It's about free choice and free thought. I respect both sides because fundamentally they are both true: the right to choose a particular belief. The second we tell someone their choice is wrong, you attempt to strip them of their choice, their freedom Not tolerable. We are already fighting the left on this, let's not fight each other as well.
People thinking if you support Trump that you have to subscribe to a religious ideal are a problem as well. If it's not pornographic, scroll and ignore.
DID IT EVER OCCUR TO YOU THAT SOME PEOPLE LOVE BEAUTY FOR BEAUTIES' SAKE. NOT ALL MEN THAT APPRECIATE GODS CREATIONS ARE LUSTFUL! JUDGE NOT LEST YE BE JUDGED.
nope, aint had playboy since the seventies. no porn no alcohol just hard work, raising my family, and minding my own business.are you tired of trolling me yet, if your going to DC you may need me....I am a veteran also, see you there
at last, a person of reason...there is nothing more beautiful than two people bound together by, and faithfully walking with God, unless you count the gift of children. Jesus came not to condemn but to save. my temper and salty language get the better of me sometimes, but I try
SAME HERE. I finally got myself well enough to start swimming again a few years ago. And damn, it was nearly impossible to find a modest, ordinary swimsuit that wasn't almost deliberately ugly. It was demoralizing in a way. I did finally luck out and get a basic black one that wasn't hideous. But it sucked. I didn't want one that would attract strangers, but I at least wanted my hubby to think I looked pretty in it...
If you happen to know where I can find a good old fashioned sailor type swimsuit that isn't open down to the danged belly button in front, I'd appreciate a link lol.
55 here, so technically behind me too I suppose. But yeah, I figured there must be a good old fashioned sailor suit somewhere in the world. While the descriptions call them "retro" sailor suits, they are NOT the ones I remember.
Lustful thoughts, if left unchecked, will eventually and necessarily lead to impure actions, even sex before marriage or adultery
While this is true, you are incorrect about calling the depiction of the human body a sin. The mere depiction of a woman's body is not a sin in and of itself. It's simply a source of natural desire for those men attracted to it.
The issue is, as you rightly state, that it can lead to temptations. The Scriptures teach us that Jesus rebuked the Pharisees for "Looking upon a woman with lust." But translated Bibles often do a disservice when they translate the Greek word "gyne" as just "woman" rather than as "married woman." Early theologians got careless with this teaching because they meant to amplify the intended message to cause us to think about our actions and desires so we don't act inappropriately. But it has had a corollary effect of causing people to develop errant theology which condemns depictions of human bodies which have done no harm.
The intention of Jesus was to rebuke the Pharisees' corrupt inward intentions to violate the marriage bond, not to condemn the attractive appearance of the woman or the natural desire of a man finding the appearance of a woman pleasing but acting responsibly to honor God and respect the proper bond of his neighbor to the wife. The source of sin is the inflammation of the desire to act without such propriety. And that sin is not the responsibility of the woman for being attractive, nor is it the responsibility of the man for merely having the desire... rather it's because the man put the desire above other important truths that are necessary to honor God.
You might make a case that it's imprudent to share such imagery if people are going to be susceptible to this temptation, but that risks turning Christianity into Islam and putting women in Hijabs or chopping off parts of peoples' anatomy to curb desires. It is wrong to shove off your responsibility onto others through false accusations.
If you have an issue with seeing the images, you can choose not to look. But instead you condemn the images as though you are God and can judge others of being sinful although they act with responsibility. What, do you assume people are just going to go and try to rape the woman because she wore a bikini? That's silly. You need to learn the intent of Christ's message before you drive people away from Him with silly talk of excessive prudishness.
Underwear? Bikinis are swimwear and culture doesn’t deduce them as lewd. Your choice to do so is your own, not God’s. Are Aborigines sinning by living in the nude as they always have? For that matter, Adam and Eve in the garden knew no sin being completely nude. The concupiscability of desire (i.e. this internal thought discussion which I referred to tangentially) is not an excuse to vilify human bodies being clad in ways you don’t like.
As for this slow process thing, no. Despite having a nature corrupted by sin, God provides every person with enough freedom to choose to do the right things. You cannot use this slow “devil made me do it” as an excuse either. Yes, addiction is an issue but it’s not the same principle as a bikini-clad woman being seen. This conflation is also misplaced.
The issue is that some people project like you their own standards as if they are God’s laws. You don’t get to tell other people that their freedom in Christ is bad just because you have an issue with their aesthetic. Not unless you provide evidence that they are acting inappropriately given the circumstances. Your qualms with bikinis are not evidence of their improper behavior.
We are free thinkers here. Stop trying to ban shit you don’t like. If you’re to weak to not view it that’s your fuckin problem. We are gonna MAGA here whether you fuck before marriage or not. Who do you think is going to do the actual dirty work when it comes down to it?? Guys with beards who like all tits.
Has it occurred to you that not all Trump supporters are devout Christians? I'm Agnostic so I couldn't care less what the bible says about "impure thoughts". I love this Country, my President, and them titties tho
Two monks who had sworn never to touch a women came to a swiftly running river. A women standing by the river was afraid to cross and asked the older monk if he would carry her. Without hesitating the older monk lifter her on his back and carried her across the river. Once on the other side the monks parted ways with the women and continued on their journey. After several hours the younger monk could not restrain himself and asked the older monk why he broke his oath and touched the women. The older monk looked at him and said, Truth is i carried her across the river for a few mins , you have been carrying her for hours.
This site should be first and foremost dedicated to information warfare - actual hard info (we did great work poring through the 'COVID relief' monstrosity for example) and memes which will redpill the masses. That's all I want to see on the front page, pure signal. Memes which aren't going to redpill anyone are also not productive. We're in a serious time right now, and this does matter.
I'd prefer if the main TD.win didn't show a single scantily clad female. No matter how appealing, it dilutes the message. Harms the signal to noise ratio. There's a place for it, to be sure, but ideally a separate .win community.
I would love to see families. I tend to simply scroll past the bikini babes, and not upvote them. I have noticed the tone of posts changes quite a lot between day and night, just like any city in the real world does.
Some of the bikini pics are immodest. I think it’s fine to post pictures of good looking Trump supporters but we don’t need to see anybody’s ass cheeks in a g-string. I just keep scrolling.
Maybe OP should just scroll past the posts he’s offended by instead of having a whinge.
You mean, respect the free speech of others?
No one is calling for bans. It was a call to exercise free speech carefully and thoughtfully, lest unexpected consequences manifest.
Have fun with your forum sliding fake toddies.
🤣
Op sad that taking hormones didn’t make him a pretty her.
“FranklySuperior”
Suck it up, buttercup.
We are a diverse group. What do you think you are going to accomplish? Sow division here?
Is that the latest script? I've seen two such whiny posts in the last couple minutes.
NOPE.
Maga with us, that's great. Complain and demand that we all behave the way you want, then GTFO.
Funny u mention scripts: https://thedonald.win/p/11RNk62ELP/sexism-concern-trolls-are-the-la/
It's not really about the ladies or the bikinis you know. It's about generating a large number of posts that aren't about Trump or election-related issues in a short amount of time, and masking those off-topic posts by throwing a "MAGA" in there so it doesn't look like obvious trolling. If the women didn't have "MAGA" in the picture, but were simple bikini-babes pics, they'd be deleted right away. It's spam, designed to suppress legitimate conversation, pure and simple.
personally I do not post for numbers, I post diversions so doomers and downs can have a laugh or enjoy thinking about something else for a change. the root of prejudice is pre-judge, don't assume other peoples motives
I watched the board fill up with bikini pics from a single user while real discussion threads were pushed down to the bottom of the list last night, I know what spamming looks like when I see it. Don't try to gaslight me.
I don't have too,you are doing it your self. I scroll past the fluff or go to hot and rising. worry about position and standing is vanity
Don't post bikini pics, people don't like them and you're not "cheering up doomers". You're spamming, and antagonizing Christians as well, OP is 100% right.
buddy I am a christian and I don't believe anyone should tell anyone else what they can share on a "free platform". you are showing yourselves to be no different than the people we oppose. the lord said to isaiah "come let us reason together"...you should complain to the moderators,not browbeat people who think differently than you. and why don't you click my about button and see if I have posted any bikini pictures,you will be disappointed
“people don’t like them”
Who the fuck elected you to represent everyone on t_D?? 😂
This is a discussion board, not an image board. Go post em on gab, i hear they love that shit over there.
...meanwhile, 95% of your posts are images. I’ve been looking at beautiful MAGA babes on t_D for years and don’t need some Karen dictating what type of board this is or should be. Fuck outta here with this shit.
I am married with children but will always appreciate seeing good looking women in bikinis. I guess I am "part of the problem". Not sure I see the definition of "problem" the same way you do. But Merry Christmas!
I dislike seeing that stuff, too. I’m with the OP. It’s junk that people don’t need to see and isn’t helpful, and I don’t want to be ambushed by it. 90% of you are completely enslaved to porn and other salacious media, and you don’t even know it. I just want to see Trump and other conservative news. If you want to post porn (even of the soft-core variety), Reddit will welcome you with open arms. They’re all over it.
You are kind of assuming everyone is a perverted Christian like yourself.
I for one like to look at fit babes in Trumpware.
Calm down Torquemada
☝️👍
Lame
You have a right to your opinion and men have a right to look at a woman who chose to pose in her bikini. It's about free choice and free thought. I respect both sides because fundamentally they are both true: the right to choose a particular belief. The second we tell someone their choice is wrong, you attempt to strip them of their choice, their freedom Not tolerable. We are already fighting the left on this, let's not fight each other as well.
People thinking if you support Trump that you have to subscribe to a religious ideal are a problem as well. If it's not pornographic, scroll and ignore.
More people are offended by the foul language than the bikini pics.
DID IT EVER OCCUR TO YOU THAT SOME PEOPLE LOVE BEAUTY FOR BEAUTIES' SAKE. NOT ALL MEN THAT APPRECIATE GODS CREATIONS ARE LUSTFUL! JUDGE NOT LEST YE BE JUDGED.
nope, aint had playboy since the seventies. no porn no alcohol just hard work, raising my family, and minding my own business.are you tired of trolling me yet, if your going to DC you may need me....I am a veteran also, see you there
at last, a person of reason...there is nothing more beautiful than two people bound together by, and faithfully walking with God, unless you count the gift of children. Jesus came not to condemn but to save. my temper and salty language get the better of me sometimes, but I try
SAME HERE. I finally got myself well enough to start swimming again a few years ago. And damn, it was nearly impossible to find a modest, ordinary swimsuit that wasn't almost deliberately ugly. It was demoralizing in a way. I did finally luck out and get a basic black one that wasn't hideous. But it sucked. I didn't want one that would attract strangers, but I at least wanted my hubby to think I looked pretty in it...
If you happen to know where I can find a good old fashioned sailor type swimsuit that isn't open down to the danged belly button in front, I'd appreciate a link lol.
55 here, so technically behind me too I suppose. But yeah, I figured there must be a good old fashioned sailor suit somewhere in the world. While the descriptions call them "retro" sailor suits, they are NOT the ones I remember.
While this is true, you are incorrect about calling the depiction of the human body a sin. The mere depiction of a woman's body is not a sin in and of itself. It's simply a source of natural desire for those men attracted to it.
The issue is, as you rightly state, that it can lead to temptations. The Scriptures teach us that Jesus rebuked the Pharisees for "Looking upon a woman with lust." But translated Bibles often do a disservice when they translate the Greek word "gyne" as just "woman" rather than as "married woman." Early theologians got careless with this teaching because they meant to amplify the intended message to cause us to think about our actions and desires so we don't act inappropriately. But it has had a corollary effect of causing people to develop errant theology which condemns depictions of human bodies which have done no harm.
The intention of Jesus was to rebuke the Pharisees' corrupt inward intentions to violate the marriage bond, not to condemn the attractive appearance of the woman or the natural desire of a man finding the appearance of a woman pleasing but acting responsibly to honor God and respect the proper bond of his neighbor to the wife. The source of sin is the inflammation of the desire to act without such propriety. And that sin is not the responsibility of the woman for being attractive, nor is it the responsibility of the man for merely having the desire... rather it's because the man put the desire above other important truths that are necessary to honor God.
You might make a case that it's imprudent to share such imagery if people are going to be susceptible to this temptation, but that risks turning Christianity into Islam and putting women in Hijabs or chopping off parts of peoples' anatomy to curb desires. It is wrong to shove off your responsibility onto others through false accusations.
If you have an issue with seeing the images, you can choose not to look. But instead you condemn the images as though you are God and can judge others of being sinful although they act with responsibility. What, do you assume people are just going to go and try to rape the woman because she wore a bikini? That's silly. You need to learn the intent of Christ's message before you drive people away from Him with silly talk of excessive prudishness.
I agree. God expects better of us, even internally.
Underwear? Bikinis are swimwear and culture doesn’t deduce them as lewd. Your choice to do so is your own, not God’s. Are Aborigines sinning by living in the nude as they always have? For that matter, Adam and Eve in the garden knew no sin being completely nude. The concupiscability of desire (i.e. this internal thought discussion which I referred to tangentially) is not an excuse to vilify human bodies being clad in ways you don’t like.
As for this slow process thing, no. Despite having a nature corrupted by sin, God provides every person with enough freedom to choose to do the right things. You cannot use this slow “devil made me do it” as an excuse either. Yes, addiction is an issue but it’s not the same principle as a bikini-clad woman being seen. This conflation is also misplaced.
The issue is that some people project like you their own standards as if they are God’s laws. You don’t get to tell other people that their freedom in Christ is bad just because you have an issue with their aesthetic. Not unless you provide evidence that they are acting inappropriately given the circumstances. Your qualms with bikinis are not evidence of their improper behavior.
Truth
We are free thinkers here. Stop trying to ban shit you don’t like. If you’re to weak to not view it that’s your fuckin problem. We are gonna MAGA here whether you fuck before marriage or not. Who do you think is going to do the actual dirty work when it comes down to it?? Guys with beards who like all tits.
I disagree with them because they are spam. If I want spam I'd check my email
Has it occurred to you that not all Trump supporters are devout Christians? I'm Agnostic so I couldn't care less what the bible says about "impure thoughts". I love this Country, my President, and them titties tho
Two monks who had sworn never to touch a women came to a swiftly running river. A women standing by the river was afraid to cross and asked the older monk if he would carry her. Without hesitating the older monk lifter her on his back and carried her across the river. Once on the other side the monks parted ways with the women and continued on their journey. After several hours the younger monk could not restrain himself and asked the older monk why he broke his oath and touched the women. The older monk looked at him and said, Truth is i carried her across the river for a few mins , you have been carrying her for hours.
I agree but not for the same reasons.
This site should be first and foremost dedicated to information warfare - actual hard info (we did great work poring through the 'COVID relief' monstrosity for example) and memes which will redpill the masses. That's all I want to see on the front page, pure signal. Memes which aren't going to redpill anyone are also not productive. We're in a serious time right now, and this does matter.
I'd prefer if the main TD.win didn't show a single scantily clad female. No matter how appealing, it dilutes the message. Harms the signal to noise ratio. There's a place for it, to be sure, but ideally a separate .win community.
I would love to see families. I tend to simply scroll past the bikini babes, and not upvote them. I have noticed the tone of posts changes quite a lot between day and night, just like any city in the real world does.
But families would be nice.
Or do both.
So...you prefer women with Dicks OP?
Some of the bikini pics are immodest. I think it’s fine to post pictures of good looking Trump supporters but we don’t need to see anybody’s ass cheeks in a g-string. I just keep scrolling.
Perhaps MAGA chicks in burkas would be more to your liking.
I’m trying to be religious, I want to believe, I want God in my life,,,
But dude tits are awesome
Not talking Big Mike or Barry Obama man tits,
Just good firm supple genetically female tits
God thank you for tits
ok doomer.. ask mom for some chicken tendies and go back to your roll. lol
Could be women downvoting them as well.
This isn’t Sunday mass, this is the_Donald.
And I thought Pandora's box was a porn movie