If you enter the site name correctly, Google sends you here, for now. But they never allow the site to appear as a possible destination site. If you do not know exactly what the site name is, you will not find it.
Comments (46)
sorted by:
If you enter the site name correctly, Google sends you here, for now. But they never allow the site to appear as a possible destination site. If you do not know exactly what the site name is, you will not find it.
Net neutrality is the opposite of regulation.
You too?
You realize that the Constitution and the Bill of Rights are technically regulations, but they spell out freedoms?
Just like Net Neutrality could do, if worded competently.
The Bill of Rights are NOT regulations, "technically", or otherwise. They are God-given and an unalienable aspect of our humanity. Please, please give up with the net neutrality shit. We are sick to fucking death of this horseshit rearing it's ugly head every few months, to divide us. Please stop.
Net neutrality only divides those of us who like freedom of speech and assembly on the internet from the ones who do not want Net Neutrality.
I did not address the fact that the Constitution and Bill of rights are regulations in my other response. They are. Those two documents are the foundation of our code of laws. Our legal system is constrained by them. They were written by man, no matter what the source. They literally regulate the legal system in the US.
We need Net Neutrality, just not THAT net neutrality. I agree with you on that.
I know what I am talking about. Understanding net neutrality is not complex.
The problem with net neutrality is that activist politicians put retarded crap into the bill.
That does not mean Net Neutrality is bad, it means politicians tend to poison any law by adding stupid shit to it.
I want net neutrality. Real net neutrality. The sort of net neutrality that would allow this website to challenge Google in court because they are artificially restricting search results to obfuscate access to this site.
Net neutrality was all about the ISP's. It did nothing for Google... And Google was a huge SUPPORTER of Net Neutrality.
Google is definitely a provider of an Internet Service. Specifically, they are a sort of an internet index.
They're a search engine/advertiser.
Which is an Internet Service that they Provide.
Google is no longer just an ad server.
You're confusing a company that sells services ON the internet to INTERNET SERVICE PROVIDERS who sell physical access to the internet.
Err. It has everything to do with net neutrality.
Network neutrality, most commonly called net neutrality, is the principle that Internet service providers (ISPs) must treat all Internet communications equally, and not discriminate or charge differently based on user, content, website, platform, application, type of equipment, source address, destination address, or method of communication.
Based on history, have you ever seen one single piece of legislation that the left obeys? What makes you think that just having net neutrality on the books will mean that the big players will respect it. Also, if they give it any regard at all, it'll be to find the loopholes and exploit them, just like they're doing with 230 protections. Don't keep advocating laws that end up restricting us, instead.
Do you think it is a good idea to ignore a problem just because lots of other people are ignoring it?
Do you support the efforts being made to fight voter fraud this election? Or are you ignoring it because lots of other people are ignoring it?
You obviously didn't read the legal pork attached to Net neutrality. Basically, it would allow the US gov't to shut down any website it wants. You don't want any gov't to have that kind of power, unless you are a fascist or a commie or a dem.
I did read some of the stupid crap attached to Net Neutrality. Having stupid crap attached to a bill does not make the idea of Net Neutrality bad, it simply means that there were people who added stupid crap to the bill that needed to be stripped out.
Saying the basic concept of Net Neutrality is bad because of some stupid stuff mixed in is like saying all air is bad because there's pollution in it.
Just like one would say the water is bad because it has arsenic in it. You wouldn't drink it, you wouldn't want it, and it wouldn't really be water. Actually, Net Neutrality was a legal power grab draped with a fancy, good sounding name, "Net Neutralty" - who wouldbe against net neutrality? Just like "equality" and "inclusivity"... fancy names for power grabbing schemes.
The stupid, fucked up bill by the name Net Neutrality was indeed a power grab. The concept of Net Neutrality is not.
Don't go to Google.
Simply ignoring people who are destroying the country is not a good plan.
I didn't say ignore. Use duckduckgo or bing or something.
I have Duck Duck Go as well, but if we simply bury our heads in the sand, the Left will just bury the rest of our bodies.
If we keep using their sources or whatever they'll keep thinking they're winning. Break the illusion, don't stoop to their level. Leftism is a mental disorder (literally go look up BPD and what causes the carriers to trigger it) so bending to their degenerate demands only makes us weaker as a society.
Know your enemy.
If you ignore the enemy, you will lose.
Don't ignore them, doesn't mean you should use an evil search engine. But it's a free country so do what's best for you.