10
Comments (4)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
1
echomike13 1 point ago +1 / -0

Good news in the comment section of the article:

"What am I missing? A quick search shows that California reversed this and the facts as laid out in this article were not totally as described. Here is one link discussing this.

https://forums.qrz.com/index.php?threads/california-officials-declare-ham-radio-no-longer-a-benefit-demands-ham-radio-repeater-infrastructur.676338/page-9

I would appreciate knowing if I missed something, or is the above article just overcome by events and the word did not get out?? If so, a correction should be posted by the author. I want to be clear, I am NOT criticizing, just trying to post the most up to date info."